MOLIMO CC U CASINO GURU MLRO (SLUŽBENIK ZA PRIJAVLJIVANJE NOVCA)
CASINO GURU: Naš stav je da proces provjere nije trebao biti završen samo na osnovu razlike između dva atributa datoteke
BETPAT: Potvrda korisnika nije bila dio navedenih atributa, KYC je odobren na osnovu početnih dokumenata koje je dostavio kupac, slažemo se da je kupac onaj za koga se izjašnjava, to nije upitno, to nije razlog zašto račun ima zatvoreno, ovo smo već spomenuli, molimo vas da razumijete problem.
1. Verifikacija klijenta za KYC odobrena je na osnovu dostavljenih dokumenata.
2. Identitet kupca nije doveden u pitanje, stoga nema potrebe za "skype pozivom" radi provjere klijenta, pojasnili smo ovu poziciju u posljednjoj poruci e -pošte.
3. Čekovi za sprečavanje pranja novca obrađeni su kao dio naših obaveza po KYC/AML -u, primijećeno je da je klijent dostavio izmijenjeni bankarski dokument.
4. Casino Guru je priznao da je klijent dostavio izmijenjeni bankovni dokument.
5. Casino Guru nas tjera da prihvatimo izmijenjene bankovne dokumente u skladu s našom politikom KYC/AML -a. Ako ne prihvatimo vaše mišljenje, smanjit ćete nam rejting.
Ako možete objasniti BetPat -u na svom stručnom mišljenju zašto je dotični bankovni dokument možda izmijenjen, jer spominjete da postoji mnogo razloga, i zašto prema mišljenju Casina Gurua da bismo na osnovu toga trebali promijeniti svoju politiku pranja novca, kako bismo omogućili izmijenjeno bankarstvo dokumenti.
Vrlo sam zainteresiran da član osoblja Casina Gurua ima kvalificirano mišljenje o našim i međunarodnim standardima SPN -a, savjetovali smo ovom članu osoblja da to proslijedi MLRO -u Casino Guru -a (službeniku za izvještavanje o pranju novca), što se nije dogodilo, član osoblja tjera BetPat da prihvati izmijenjeni bankarski dokument, smatramo da je to krajnje neregularno i protivno međunarodnim standardima za borbu protiv pranja novca.
PLEASE CC TO CASINO GURU MLRO (MONEY LAUNDERING REPORTING OFFICER)
CASINO GURU: Our position is that the verification process should not have been concluded just based on the difference between the two attributes of the file
BETPAT: Customer Verification was not part of the attributes mentioned, KYC was approved based on the initial documents provided by the customer, we agree that the customer is who he says he is, this is not in question, this is not why the account has been closed, we have mentioned this previously, please understand the problem.
1. Verification of the customer for KYC was approved on the documents provided.
2. The identity of the customer is not in question, therefore there is no need to have a "skype call" to verify the customer, we have clarified this position in the last email.
3. AML checks were processed as part of our KYC/AML obligations, it was noticed that modified banking document was supplied by the customer.
4. Casino Guru recognised the customer has supplied a modified banking document.
5. Casino Guru are forcing us to accept modified banking documents against our KYC/AML policy, If we don't accept your opinion, you will reduce our rating.
If you can explain to BetPat in your professional opinion why the banking document in question may have been modified, as you mention there are many reasons, and why in Casino Guru's opinion that we should change our AML policy based on this, to allow modified banking documents.
I'm very interested that Casino Guru member of staff has a qualified opinion in regards to our and international AML standards, we have advised this member of staff to forward this to Casino Guru's MLRO, (Money Laundering Reporting Officer) which has not happened, the member of staff is forcing BetPat to accept a modified banking document, we find this highly irregular and against international standards to combat money laundering.
Automatski prevedeno:![](https://static.casino.guru/res/202502141249/images/svg/translated-by-google.svg)