Dragi Branislave,
Želim da razjasnim neke stvari. Da, mogu da potvrdim da je to bio još jedan nalog registrovan u kazinu sa IP adrese sa koje sam igrao ova dva dana, ali taj nalog nije bio moj i to ću dokazati ovom objavom.
1.)Izraz kazina KONKRETNO tvrdi da se BONUSI mogu koristiti samo sa 1 IP/UREĐAJA itd itd. Pošto kazino donosi sirove termine kada je očigledno da postoje 2 osobe a ne 1 (o ovom pitanju ću dalje proširiti moj e-mail) vraćam njihove uslove sirove.
2.) I ja i moj otac smo registrovani I oboje smo prošli KIC na pomenutom kazinu. Kazino ima naše adrese, koje nisu iste. Naše adrese se poklapaju sa IPS-om sa kojeg smo igrali. Moj otac živi 3 sata od mesta gde ja živim. Iz perioda u kojima mi je rekao da je igrao velika je verovatnoća da su oba naloga radila u isto vreme, sa IPS-a koji su udaljeni jedan od drugog, što odgovara adresama koje smo registrovali. Što se mene tiče, i ja i moj otac smo ljudi, a ne neki čudni vanzemaljci, da mogu postojati na 2 mesta u isto vreme. Kazino bi LAKO mogao da proveri da li imaju registrovan slučaj oca + sina kada su proverili svoje KIC procedure ili kada su me zabranili. I zbog čega su me zabranili? Igram bez bonusa u domu mog oca 2 dana od 100 prijava koje imam sa svog IP-a? Razumem da postoje slučajevi da se neko registruje sa više naloga koristeći prednosti rođaka, ali uobičajeno.... Kupio sam drugi dom i platio VPN da bi se IP adresa uskladila sa ovim delom Grčke, da bih zatražio kazino bonus?
Razumem da je Kazino postavio ova pravila da bi se zaštitio od prevaranata... ali zato postoje uslovi i moraju se primenjivati u dobroj nameri.
3.) Recimo da su svi računi bili moji (nisu, kao što vidite lako mogu da razotkrijem njihove tvrdnje), opet je nebitno. Trenutno su SVI RAČUNI zatvoreni. Pošto me je Kazino POZIVAO (putem promocije nekoliko puta, čak i kada sam im rekao da prestanu da ih šalju) i pošto mi je Kazino dao dozvolu da igram i ponovo otvorio moj nalog, NAROČITO kada sam im pomenuo sve od početka, NE MOGU da traže rok za više naloga. Smešno je što Kazino do danas šalje mejlove mom ocu sa promocijama, dok me sa druge strane optužuju da posedujem nalog koji mi je banovao.
4.) Zašto bih otvarao više naloga, da bih dobio bonuse, kada sam već imao bolje promocije? Nema smisla?
Konačno, kao što vidite gospodine Branislave, od prvog dana se ponašam u dobroj veri. Ne koristim pojmove da ih koristim u svoju korist. Ako želim da forsiram stvari u svoju korist, mogu da koristim Zakone (podsetite to kazinu jer se plaše da otvoreno učestvuju u ovom slučaju) u svoju korist i u lošoj nameri i ako to učinim, traženi iznos neće biti biti 1.000, biće mnogo više. Ako se ovaj slučaj zatvori a da kazino ne plati ono što mi DUŽNI fer i pošteno, otvoriću novi iz drugih razloga, sa drugačijim potraživanjima, pitajući druge stvari.
Dakle, dragi CasinoIn, pre nego što odgovorite u vezi potraživanja za 1.000 evra, odgovorite nam, da li imate nešto da kažete o tome da se vaše promocije šalju na mejlove i naloge koji su blokirani i korisnik vas je više puta tražio da prestanete? Da li želite da pročitate GDPR zakone za subjekte koji posluju u EU? Ili želite da pročitate zakone Curacao o ovoj stvari pre nego što odgovorite?
Ovo je moje poslednje upozorenje kazinu. Izvinjavam se zbog tona, ali evo već 3+ meseca radim sve u dobroj nameri, dok Kazino čak ni zvanično ne odgovara na moju tvrdnju, nenamerno donosi termin kada je kristalno jasno da ne uzimam prednost bilo čega.
Iskreno vaš,
George
Dear Branislav,
I want to clarify some things. Yes I can confirm that was another account registered to the casino from the IP I played these two days from, but that account was not mine and I will prove it with this post.
1.)The casino term SPECIFICALLY claims that THE BONUSES can be used only from 1 IP/DEVICE etc etc. Since the Casino brings raw terms when it is obvious that there are 2 people and not 1(I will expand on this issue further on my e-mail) , I bring back their terms raw.
2.)Both me and my father are registered AND we both passed KYC on said Casino. The Casino has our addresses,which are not the same. Our addresses match with the IPS we played from. My father lives 3 hours away from where I live. From the periods he told me he played it is highly likely that both accounts were operating at the same time , from IPS that are far away from each other, matching the addresses we registered . As far as I am concerned both me and my father are humans and not some weird kind of alliens , to be able to exist at 2 places at the same time. The Casino could EASILY check that they have a case of father + son registered when they checked their KYC procedures or when they banned me. And they banned me for what? Playing without bonus at my father's home for 2 days out of 100 log ins I have from my IP? I understand that there are cases that someone registers with multiple accounts taking advantage of relatives , but common.... I bought a second home and paid for VPN to match the IP with this area of Greece , to claim a casino bonus?
I understand that the Casino set these rules to protect themselves from scammers ... but that is why terms exist and they have to be applied in good faith.
3.)Let's say that all the accounts were mine (they are not, as you can see I can easily debunk their claims), again it is irrelevant. At the moment ALL ACCOUNTS were closed. Since the Casino INVITED ME (through promotion several times,even when I told them to stop sending them) and since the Casino gave me the permission to play and reopened my account, ESPECIALLY when I mentioned to them everything from start , THEY CANNOT claim the multiple accounts term. The funny thing is that the Casino up to this day is sending e-mails to my father with promotions , while on the other hand they are accusing me of owning said account banned me.
4.)Why would I open multiple accounts , to claim bonuses , when I had already better promotions? Does it make sense?
Finally , as you can see mr Branislav , since day 1 I am acting in good faith. I don't take advantage of terms to use them to my advantage. If I want to force things in my advantage , I can use Laws (remind that to the Casino since they are afraid to participate openly on this case) in my advantage in bad faith as well and if I do so , the amount claimed will not be 1.000 , it will be much more. If this case close without the casino paying what they OWE me fair and square , I will open a new one for other reasons , with different claims , asking other things.
So , dear CasinoIn, before you answer about the claim for the 1.000 euros , please answer to us , have you something to say about your promotions being sent to e-mails and accounts that were blocked and the user asked you multiple times to stop? Do you want to read the GDPR Laws for entities operating in the EU? Or do you want to read the Curacao Laws about this matter before you answer?
This is my final warning to the Casino. I am sorry about my tone , but for 3 + months here I am doing everything in good faith , while the Casino is not even replying officialy to my claim, bringing a term in bad faith, when it is crystal clear that I am not taking advantage of anything.
Sincerely yours,
George
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno:
