Zdravo Chris187,
Hvala vam puno što ste podneli žalbu. Žao mi je što čujem za vaš problem. Dozvolite mi da vam postavim nekoliko pitanja, kako bih u potpunosti razumeo celu situaciju.
Dozvolite mi da vam objasnim koja je razlika između zatvaranja naloga i samoisključenja:
Neki kazina koriste mnogo alata za odgovorno kockanje i ja ih ovde ne bih pominjao. Šta igrači mogu da urade ako su nezadovoljni u kazinu: Zatvori nalog ili se samoisključe, to su dva osnovna izbora.
Zatvaranje naloga je jednostavno i nema skoro nikakvog uticaja - igrač može ponovo da otvori nalog u bilo kom trenutku, a kazino nema nikakvu obavezu prema igraču.
S druge strane, samoisključivanje to čini. Ako se igrač uspešno samoisključuje, kazino se slaže da neće otvoriti ovaj nalog ili ako da samo pod određenim okolnostima (nakon perioda hlađenja, a to se ne može učiniti za igrače koji su zavisni/sa problemom kockanja).
Hvala vam unapred na odgovoru.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Nick
Hello Chris187,
Thank you very much for submitting your complaint. I’m sorry to hear about your problem. Please allow me to ask you a few questions, so I can understand the whole situation completely.
Please, let me explain you what the difference between closing the account and self-exclusion is:
Some casinos use lots of tools for responsible gambling and I would not mention them here. What players can do if they’re unhappy in the casino: Close the account or self-exclude themselves, those are the two basic choices.
Closing an account is simple and has almost no impact - the player can reopen account anytime, and casino has no obligation to the player.
On the other hand, self-exclusion does. If a player successfully makes a self-exclusion, the casino agrees not to open this account or if yes only under particular circumstances (after cooling off period and this cannot be done for players who are addicted/with gambling problem).
Thank you very much in advance for your reply.
Best regards,
Nick
Automatski prevedeno: