Pa, nisam siguran šta da dodam, da budem iskren. Uvek očekujemo da tehnologija rešava jednostavne zadatke, ali kao što vidite, daleko je od standarda.
Hvala na odgovorima, mada još uvek ne razumem u potpunosti kontekst. Verujem da sam izneo svoje mišljenje o ovom pitanju i čini se da obojici dosta teško shvatamo nijanse.
Probaću ovo: uslovi bonusa bi trebalo da budu dostupni pre nego što igrač uzme bonus. Isto važi i za pravila koja određuju depozite ili programe lojalnosti. Ako ste ubeđeni da vam kazino nikada neće platiti i stoga nećete uplatiti depozit, razumem da za kazino to nije baš prihvatljiv razlog, posebno ako je depozit pomenut u pravilima. S druge strane, igrač je možda u pravu i nikada nećemo saznati dok igrač ne pokuša da se povuče.
Opet, nisam siguran da sam dobro shvatio...
Well, I'm not sure what to add, to be honest. We always expect the technology to resolve simple tasks, but as you can see, it is far from standard.
Thanks for the answers, though I still do not fully understand the context. I believe I stated my opinion on the matter and it seems we're both having quite a hard time getting the nuances here.
I'll try this: Bonus terms should be available before the player takes the bonus. The same goes for rules specifying the deposits or loyalty programs. If you are convinced the casino is never going to pay you and thus you won't deposit, I understand that for the casino it is not a very acceptable reason, specifically if the deposit is mentioned in the rules. On the other hand, the player may be right and we will never find out until the player tries to withdraw.
Again, I'm not sure I got it correctly...
Automatski prevedeno: