ForumKazinaFreeSpino Casino - opšta diskusija

FreeSpino Casino - opšta diskusija (strana 3)

pre 11 meseci od andandjonnyx
|
9444 pregleda 76 odgovora |
|
12 3 45
Dodajte post
pre 10 meseci

Hey,


Casino.guru has already fulfilled their responsibility here, since they disclose the fact that the bonuses are sticky before even claiming them.


According to the T&Cs that these players have accepted before claiming these bonuses, the winnings were to be removed upon fulfillment of wagering requirements, not before their withdrawal, so we are not bound to any compensation from this point of view.


Even if we were, how exactly would you quantify this loss? Some players may have requested a withdrawal immediately after the wagering was complete, and thus no difference would have been made. Some players may have continued playing with the funds, and lost, which would have meant a loss for the player, while others may have won, but this cannot be estimated due to the random nature of slots.

pre 10 meseci

Hello.

At first, it would be best to use the reply button, so other players as well as the recipient are well aware of the context. Additionally, this feature notifies the recipient of your reply. 🙏


pre 10 meseci

Bonuses are not sticky bonuses.

I'm sure it has been pointed out here many times by various people.


If the casino guru had actually used the bonus at this casino even once, he would not have misrepresented it as a sticky bonus.

In other words, they took the casino's misrepresentation at face value, and put the information on the website without doing proper research.


At least there was no such statement in the Terms of Service at the time I looked.

I know that the casinos here change their terms of service without notifying players.

Therefore, the terms of use are not the reason.

What is important is that many users have been lied to and deceived about sticky bonuses.


(If you're going to bring up the Terms of Service in the first place, you should consider the fact that users don't know what is right about the contradiction between the statement that it is a sticky bonus and the statement that it is removed once the wagering requirement is met.)


The loss cannot be quantified.

That's how stupid you people are.


Users deposited money believing it was a sticky bonus because of the false explanation, and as a result, they did not receive the sticky bonus.

If that is the case, then the best way to fix it is to grant the bonus as a no-deposit bonus.

pre 10 meseci

I understand your point.

Yet in this case, we provide information given by the casino.

Keeping this whole conversation in mind, I guess it will all be settled once the casino changes the terms accordingly. Honestly, I did not read the whole discussion, but I am convinced we aim to provide accurate information, so the proper department will be notified to check the bonus terms available on our website.

You are always free to use this feature to help us out:

file


FreeSpino Casino
pre 10 meseci

I don't recall the balance being reduced when withdrawing.

As long as you don't change your system before refusing, we don't have a choice.

You did not change the system and as a result, several players lost their money.

This is the truth.

FreeSpino Casino
pre 10 meseci

Thank you, very good news then.

We'll wait for it to be updated then in the CGU.


yes because it's quite shocking, because we don't expect that at all, and we say to ourselves "well why did I take a bonus then?"

So good news you review this bonus into a real sticky bonus (let it be the player who decides when the bonus amount will be withdrawn, at the time of its withdrawal).


yes thank you very much for your email

which I accepted with pleasure.

and thank you for the correction


Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
andandjonnyx
pre 10 meseci

We agree that these are not sticky bonuses (deduction at the time of withdrawal).


But we can't talk about deception, I would say more about clumsiness.

The casino by coming to interact here, and listening to players' requests shows seriousness.


Which, believe me, is not the case for everyone!


They have decided to review their bonus, with real sticky bonuses (deduction at the time of withdrawal and not at the end of the bet), so they are looking to improve this problem.


who was one, that much is clear.


Because someone who sends spins at 2 euros and suddenly finds themselves, in the middle of the game, with their balance reduced by a lot, without being warned, can suddenly find themselves completely at zero and above all it completely changes the entire game .

the casino noticed this, for me it's a sign that they are serious.

And there's a lack of serious casinos...

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
FreeSpino Casino
pre 10 meseci

Hello

as you are reviewing your bonuses, there is a question that I am asking myself and am not sure I fully understand in your T&Cs.

you give the choice between sticky bonus (deduction of the bonus at the time of withdrawal) and bonus with wager.

Your wager bonuses are x50 of the bonus, which is already significant for a wager.

And further, below it is written "all our bonuses are sticky bonuses" (?).

Tell me that I misunderstood, that you are not asking in addition to the x50 wager, that the bonus also be deducted, at the time of withdrawal?

Then I looked to see if the withdrawal was indeed unlimited for bonuses with a wager (which is generally the case and makes the difference when choosing such a big wager). I didn't find anything.

Just that your bonuses are limited to a withdrawal of x10 of the deposit.

Here too I hope not to have found the line which indicates that a bonus with wager does indeed have unlimited withdrawal.

Because that would really be a lot for a bonus with a x50 wager,

that the bonus is deducted at the time of withdrawal but in addition it is a limited withdrawal x10 of the deposit.

Which would make 3 limitations: wager + sticky + limited withdrawal.

Because I wouldn't see the difference with a bonus with wager x 5 except that the bonus offer is a little higher, but that is often the case since there is a wager.

and the enormous disadvantage of taking with a wager x50.

What would be the advantage of taking a bonus with such a big wager if it has no difference from one that does x5 wager ?

So I think, not having found the bonus information with wager, which cannot be identical to the other?

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
Linne
pre 10 meseci

Interesting question and I'm curious how the casino will handle it. Apparently it hasn't finished editing bonuses yet so we'll see, because they said they'll update this thread when they do. So obviously we'll have to be patient and see how the bonus conditions change. 🙂

pre 10 meseci

I think I got the answer by email and now I'm still stunned.

I've never seen this type of bonus before:

wager x50 (bonus!)

+ bonus deducted on withdrawal 😳 therefore bigger deduction than the other bonus.

+ limited withdrawal x10 (of the deposit!)

I never take bonus with betting where I am also limited to withdrawal.

But there, it's only x10 of the deposit, in addition.

And what's more, with deduction of the bonus..

I don't understand the point of taking such a big wager to have exactly the same restrictions as the other.

The bonus % is slightly higher, but that's still the case everywhere when there's a big wager.

Now, you're taking too big a risk, too much time, for not much in the end.

While you have exactly the same (x5).

I've never seen such a bonus before, it's huge, so many restrictions on a bonus.

I thought I missed the line, in the T&Cs, which talks about unlimited withdrawal for this one, or that they should add it since they are in the process of updating, but no

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
Linne
pre 10 meseci

Smisao uzimanja bonusa je da igrate sa svojim. Bonusi su za lude ljude.

Automatski prevedeno:
WWW420XE
pre 10 meseci

when you make a very small deposit, or to try a casino (important) and they are clear and simple, no it's good.

When they are complicated with lots of restrictions yes it's for the crazy

pre 10 meseci

I think I got the answer by email and now I'm still stunned.

I've never seen this type of bonus before:

wager x50 (bonus!)

+ bonus deducted on withdrawal 😳 therefore bigger deduction than the other bonus.

+ limited withdrawal x10 (of the deposit!)

I never take bonus with betting where I am also limited to withdrawal.

But there, it's only x10 of the deposit, in addition.

And what's more, with deduction of the bonus..

I don't understand the point of taking such a big wager to have exactly the same restrictions as the other.

The bonus % is slightly higher, but that's still the case everywhere when there's a big wager.

Now, you're taking too big a risk, too much time, for not much in the end.

While you have exactly the same (x5).

I've never seen such a bonus before, it's huge, so many restrictions on a bonus.

I thought I missed the line, in the T&Cs, which talks about unlimited withdrawal for this one, or that they should add it since they are in the process of updating, but no

pre 10 meseci

I think that in such a case it is not very worthwhile to start such a bonus if it has all such requirements to meet. However, everyone has a choice whether to take the bonus or not, so I think it will be quite clear here that you probably won't take it. Am I right ? 🤔

pre 10 meseci

You are right.

But I took it, I thought I hadn't found the part where it talks about its withdrawal. Because it seemed obvious to me that there is no such restriction, in addition.

Then as they were updating I thought they were adding it.

Linne
pre 10 meseci

So it looks like there has been a change and you have been quite unlucky. However, you now know the full terms of the bonus now and so if you were to take it again you would probably reconsider. You will need to be more cautious about bonuses in this case. 🤔

pre 10 meseci

Hello,

I think I came across this type of bonus without having understood it.

Even worse... that's very unusual, I've never been faced with such a bonus before:

Big Wagger x50 (on the bonus!)

+ deduction of bonus on withdrawal!

+ limited withdrawal x10 (from deposit!)

huge! I did well there! 🤦🏾‍♀️



Linne
pre 10 meseci

I would probably be put off by the wagering alone, because 50 is quite a lot. According to what you describe, this bonus is quite inconvenient to be honest. Where did you come across one?  🤔

pre 10 meseci

yes it's already a lot.

freespino a new Casino if I understood correctly


he looks good but not in that way

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
Linne
pre 10 meseci

I found the proper thread about Freespino, and I see you have been quite active here as well.

It remains to say that I would not take this bonus either 🙂.

Well, this is a freshly established casino and maybe one day we will find more luxury bonuses under its roof. 🙂

pre 10 meseci

Good morning.

yes because I am registered on depositwin, a casino that I like. So I started commenting on the bonuses there

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
Linne
pre 10 meseci

It's okay. However, if you want to comment on anything about this casino, it's best to post it in the official thread so that the casinos don't get mixed up with each other. If you have something to say about another casino, you have the option to post it in their thread. However, I think you'll understand quickly and everything will be fine. 😊😉

Jaro
pre 10 meseci

I was responding to Radka who must have seen the other thread where you asked me there what I thought about bonuses with wager. I only answered your question.

Otherwise my comments concern the casinos in question where I post them

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 10 meseci
12 3 45

Pridružite se zajednici

Morate biti ulogovani da bi dodali post.

Ulogujte se
flash-message-news
Casino Guru Vesti – Pratite dnevne vesti iz industrije kockanja
Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama - Dnevni postovi, bez depozitni bonusi, novi slotovi i još toga
Pretplatite se na naš bilten i saznajte gde su najnoviji bez depozitni bonusi, novi slotovi i druge vesti