Zdravo,
Ja sam u stvari Radka. Siguran sam da ste i vi dobili objašnjenje, svaka odbijena izmena na čekanju ili recenzija je u potpunosti objašnjena. U ovom slučaju, pretpostavljam da je to verovatno zato što korisnički pregled nije kreiran za ćaskanje sa kazinom. Kazino nije u mogućnosti da ažurira odgovor. Jednostavno nije dizajnirano na ovaj način.
Ali samo nagađam pošto ne mogu retroaktivno da proverim objašnjenje. Da li biste bili ljubazni da podelite dato objašnjenje, molim vas?
Ne nameravam ništa da krijem, ako sam pogrešio, možemo to da ispravimo, samo mi je potrebna mala pomoć trenutno.
Ne manipulišemo ničim, iako imamo posla sa prevelikom količinom recenzija korisnika, tako da je prostor za nenamernu grešku upravo tu.
Ali, gledajući vašu odbijenu žalbu , pretpostavljam da je razlog bio upravo takav:
„Zdravo, hvala vam što ste poslali recenziju. Nažalost, odlučili smo da odbijemo vašu recenziju jer je zasnovana na žalbi koja se odnosi na vašu recenziju koju je odbio CasinoGuru. Hvala vam na razumevanju."
U pritužbi se kaže: „...izraz jasno kaže da treba da pošaljete e-mail ako želite da trajno zatvorite svoj nalog zbog zavisnosti od kockanja, što niste uradili . Da ste to uradili, lako biste mogli da imate dokaz o tome akcija i naš pristup ovom slučaju bi bili potpuno drugačiji. Morate shvatiti da ako kazino deli jednostavna i jasna uputstva o tome kako da zahtevate samoisključivanje, a vi ih niste sledili, a povrh toga nemate dokaz da je kazino obavešten o vašem problemu sa kockanjem, naše opcije su veoma ograničene. Uveravam vas da kad god je igrač pružio validan dokaz koji potvrđuje da je zahtevao samoisključivanje zbog zavisnosti od kockanja, mi smo učinili sve što smo mogli da pomognemo."
Stoga ne bi bilo fer ostaviti svoju recenziju vidljivom. Podelite dokaz onoga što ste opisali u recenziji i mi ćemo to ponovo razmotriti.
Cilj nam je samo da budemo pošteni i pošteni.
Hello,
I'm Radka actually. I'm sure you also received an explanation, every rejected pending edit or review is fully explained. In this case, I would assume it was probably because the user review is not created to chat with the casino. The casino is not able to update the reply. It's just not designed this way.
I'm just guessing though since I can't check the explanation retroactively. Would you be so kind to share the explanation given, please?
I do not intend to hide anything, if I made a mistake, we can correct it, I just need a little help at the moment.
We are not manipulating anything, though we deal with an excessive amount of user reviews, so the space for making an unintentional error is just there.
But, looking at your rejected complaint, I guess the reason was just like that:
"Hello, thank you for submitting your review. Unfortunately, we decided to reject your review since it's based on a complaint that is related to your review that has been rejected by CasinoGuru. Thank you for your understanding."
The complaint says: "...the term clearly says that you should send an email if you want to permanently close your account due to gambling addiction, which you didn't do. If you did so, you could easily have proof of such action and our approach to this case would be completely different. You must understand that if the casino shares simple and clear instructions on how to request self-exclusion and you didn't follow them, and on top of that you don't have any proof the casino has been informed about your gambling problem, our options are very limited. I assure you that whenever a player provided valid evidence confirming they requested self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, we did everything we could do to help."
Hence it would not be fair to leave your review visible. Share the proof of what you described in the review and we shall reconsider that.
We only aim to be fair and square.
Ažurirano od strane autora pre 1 godinu
Automatski prevedeno: