Pa, ovo je besmisleno. Opet si izvrnuo moje reči. Neću komentarisati zakonitost; Rekao sam ti to toliko puta. Mi nismo advokati; upravo ova nit pokazuje nedostatak jedinstvene primene ili čak polja za ovu praksu. Molimo vas da me ne mešate u ovo pitanje ako želite da ostanete nepristrasni.
Rekao sam da kada su igrači iskoristili ovu praksu da dobiju povraćaj sredstava samo zato što su izgubili novac, to nije bilo pošteno. To se zove kockanje bez rizika. Da li bi i oni uradili isto ako bi pobedili?
Potpuno drugačije od igrača zavisnika sa aktivno blokiranim bankarskim transakcijama na kockanju koji može da deponuje jer kazino koristi ovu praksu.
Po mom mišljenju, razlika je očigledna i jasna – usmerena na međusobnu pravičnost. Što nažalost ne znači da možemo doći do kazina da ih ljubazno zamolimo da uđu na regulisana tržišta na drugačiji način.
Zašto? Zato što mi nismo igrači koji se suočavaju sa ovim problemima i kazina nemaju razloga da razgovaraju sa nama o ovoj temi. Od nas je zatraženo da izbrišemo ovu temu, zabranimo korisnicima da daju savete i završimo sa temom, ali to nismo učinili. Jer ostavljajući vam ovaj prostor je naš način da vam pomognemo da pronađete put.
Predlažem da svoje izjave šaljete kazinom, a ne meni.
To je sve. Nisam rekao: „Oh, mislim da nije fer to što igrač dovodi u pitanje ovu nezakonitu ranu". Tvoja loša formulacija još jednom.
Ako i dalje više voliš da manipulišeš mojim rečima, završio sam sa tobom.
Well, this is pointless. Again you have twisted my words. I won't comment about legality; I have told you so for so many times. We are not lawyers; this very thread demonstrates a lack of a unified enforcement or even field for this practise. Please refrain from involving me in this matter if you prefer to remain impartial.
I said when players took advantage of this practice to get chargebacks just because they lost the money, it was not fair. It's called no-risk gambling. Would they do the same if they won?
Completely different from an addicted player with actively blocked banking transactions on gambling being able to deposit because the casino uses this practise.
In my opinion, the difference is obvious and clear - focused on mutual fairness. Which sadly does not mean we can reach out to casinos to ask them politely to enter regulated markets in a different way.
Why? Because we are not the players facing these issues and the casinos have no reason to talk with us about this subject. We have been asked to delete this thread, ban users for providing tips and get done with the subject, yet we have not done so. Because leaving you this space is our way to help you find the way.
I suggest you send your statements to casinos, not to me.
That's all. I did not say, "Oh I think its unfair that the player is questioning this illegal ransaction." Your poor wording once more.
If you still prefer to manipulate my words, I'm done with you.
Automatski prevedeno: