Ovaj odgovor i dalje izbegava suštinsko pitanje. Moja žalba se nije odnosila samo na povlačenje – radilo se o tome da je Ibets lažno tvrdio da je "pregled igre" nikada nije bio (ne moram ponovo da objašnjavam ovaj deo) i odbijao da pruži bilo kakav dokaz ili komunikaciju. To je činjenica koja ostaje nerešena, bez obzira na to da li je balans i dalje tu ili ne, saglasan?
Ako sistem Casino Gurua samo snižava indeks bezbednosti kada je novac još uvek u sporu, onda je suštinski pogrešan. Kazino može odugovlačiti isplate lažnim izgovorima, ignorisati upite igrača, i sve dok igrač na kraju odustane, rejting kazina ostaje netaknut? Ta logika omogućava lošim akterima i dovodi igrače u zabludu da veruju sajtu koji radi u lošoj nameri.
Nisam "izgubio" svoj novac; Ibets je onemogućio da ga povučem, a zatim me ignorisao više od mesec dana. Najmanje što bi trebalo da urade — čak i sada — jeste da pruže pregled igre za koji su tvrdili da čekaju. Ali neće, jer nikada nije postojao. I samo to bi trebalo da bude dovoljno da dovede u pitanje njihov integritet, zar ne?
This response still avoids the core issue. My complaint was not just about the withdrawal—it was about Ybets falsely claiming a "game review" that never happened (I do not need to explain this part again) and refusing to provide any proof or communication. That is a fact that remains unresolved, regardless of whether the balance is still there or not, agreed?
If Casino Guru's system only lowers the Safety Index when money is still in dispute, then it's fundamentally flawed. A casino can stall payouts with fake excuses, ignore player inquiries, and as long as the player eventually gives up, the casino’s rating stays intact? That logic enables bad actors and misleads players into trusting a site that operates in bad faith.
I didn’t "lose" my money; Ybets made it impossible to withdraw it, then ignored me for over a month. The least they should do—even now—is provide the game review they claimed to be waiting for. But they won’t, because it never existed. And that alone should be enough to question their integrity, right?
Automatski prevedeno: