Nisam ubeđen Zdravo!
Dozvolite mi da počnem sa najočiglednijim delom, barem za mene: Mi u Casino Guru-u smatramo da su uslovi pošteni ili nepošteni na osnovu njihovog praktičnog tumačenja prema igračima. U skladu sa tim, smatram da je apsolutno neophodno praviti razliku između povremenih igrača i strimera dok se primenjuju pravila.
Verujem da se obojica slažemo da su strimeri neka vrsta profesionalaca koji imaju drugačije ciljeve od uobičajenih igrača.
Tako će i kazino pristup najverovatnije biti drugačiji.
Ovo nas, po mom mišljenju, dovodi do činjenice da je korišćenje, na primer, fotografije više strimera u jednoj prostoriji kao argumenta za procenu pravednosti uslova, potpuna besmislica. Jer to jedva da radi prosečan igrač.
Zar se ne bi složio?
Da biste u potpunosti razumeli pristup kazina prema onim strimerima koje ste pokupili, savetujem vam da pitate kazino. Međutim, moram da dodam da nisam ubeđen da će takva istraga vama lično pomoći, jer, kako ja to vidim, kazina nikada neće podeliti podatke o svom računu sa vama, tako da nema pravog argumenta osim da vam nije dozvoljeno da igrate u istoj prostoriji kao i vaš prijatelj. Na primer, kako znate da li ti momci koriste VPN-ove ili su zaista na istom mestu ili kazinu dok strimuju? Osim toga, rekao bih, prvi obično samo održava raspoloženje, dok drugi zapravo svira. 🤷♀
Bili biste sigurni samo da imate takav pristup.
Kao što je već pomenuto:
„...kazino nam je pružio sveobuhvatne dokaze o prevarnim aktivnostima koje nas navode da verujemo da su koraci koje je kazino preduzeo u ovom slučaju opravdani. Iz tog razloga, ova žalba će sada biti odbijena. Hvala vam na razumevanju , žao mi je što ovom prilikom nismo mogli biti od veće pomoći."
( žalba 👈)
m not convinced Hi there!
Let me start with the most obvious part, at least for me: We at Casino Guru consider terms fair or unfair based on their practical interpretation toward players. In line with that, I feel it is absolutely necessary to distinguish between a casual player and a streamer while applying the rules.
I believe we both agree streamers are sort of professionals aiming for different goals than usual players do.
Thus, the casino approach will most likely be different as well.
This, in my opinion, brings us to the fact that using, for example, a photo of multiple streamers in one room as an argument for assessing the fairness of the terms is downright nonsense. Because this is hardly what the average player does.
Wouldn't you agree?
To fully understand the casino's approach toward those streamers you picked up, I strongly advise asking the casino. However, I have to add that I'm not convinced such an investigation will help you personally, because the way I see it, casinos will never share their account details with you, so there is no real argument other than that you are not allowed to play in the same room as your friend. For example, how do you know whether those guys use VPNs or are really in the same place or casino while streaming? Besides, I'd say, the first one usually just keeps the mood up, while the second is actually playing. 🤷♀️
You would only be certain if you had such access.
As already mentioned:
"...the casino has provided us with comprehensive evidence of fraudulent activity that leads us to believe that the steps the casino has taken in this case are justified. Due to that reason, this complaint will now be rejected. Thank you for your understanding, I am sorry we could not be of more help on this occasion."
(complait 👈)
Automatski prevedeno:
Molimo vas da isključite AdBlock