Tvoj stav, još jedan citat:
Naš stav
Nije prihvatljivo dozvoliti igračima da se kockaju ako kazino zna da su iz ograničene zemlje...
Mnoga kazina tvrde da je ovo teško ili nemoguće implementirati u njihove sisteme, ali se jednostavno radi o poređenju zemlje prebivališta igrača sa listom zemalja sa ograničenjem ili dozvoljenom; stoga, ne smatramo da je to tako teško na tehnološkom nivou.
Pustiću te sada da uradiš pravu stvar, a to je da otvoriš slučaj. Sve ovo je dokumentovano.
Naravno, ovo se uklapa u zagradu da me svesno prihvatite iz ograničene zemlje. To je jasan slučaj.
Ne samo da ovo nije bilo prihvatljivo, već je bilo i protivzakonito ako mi se ne refundira (nema važeće UK licence), tako da je potpuni povraćaj gubitaka minimum koji zaslužujem za pakao ove situacije koju je ove godine izazvala Goldenbet i njihovo predatorsko ponašanje prema meni .
Ako kladioničar želi da zahteva legitimitet i zakonitost, kao što bi se moglo pretpostaviti da će ispraviti gubitke igrača ako se utvrdi da je uhvaćen u lošoj nameri bez dozvole koja to dozvoljava, jer se gubici ionako češće nalaze u kockanju u odnosu na dobitke. Dakle, ako igrač pobedi, to se može uhvatiti, ali ako je igrač ukraden, svi bi trebalo da budu tihi? Što bi moglo da implicira da postoji prednost u odnosu na pomoć određenoj manjoj grupi ljudi koji zaobilaze zakon, a ne većini koja ga poštuje. Vidiš li kuda idem sa ovim?
Naravno, Goldenbet ili bilo koji drugi kladioničar ne bi morali da se suočavaju sa ovim potencijalnim problemima i pravnim pritužbama ako jednostavno nisu namerno uradili stvari u ekstremno lošoj nameri - namerno, naravno. Mislim, šta misliš kako sam ih našao? Oni uglavnom ciljaju ljude sa specifičnim opasnim oglašavanjem preko „nezavisnih" sajtova za pregled. Nema GAMSTOP-a itd. To mi zvuči kao zaobilaženje iz najgorih mogućih razloga.
Stvari koje uništavaju život, nemojte to braniti. Zbog toga postojite.
Srećom, verujem u pravilan postupak i zakon i ljude
Dobro razmislite pre nego što izjavite da ne možete da otvorite tužbu jer ćete ići protiv svog vrlo jasnog stava. Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo je ograničena zemlja prema ovom kazinu. Mogu da garantujem da njihova licenca to zabranjuje i da oni zaobilaze sopstveni ugovor o licenci i krše zakon UK namerno ciljajući i prihvatajući klijente u UK u lošoj nameri.
Kao što licenca zabranjuje i druge stvari koje pokrivate, vi ste tu da pomognete... ili bi barem trebalo da budete... Jasan slučaj kao što sam rekao, napisali ste crno na belo.
Vaš posao bi trebalo da bude razotkrivanje ovog potencijalnog ponašanja i pošteno arbitriranje. Ovo nije van okvira vaše politike. Mogu da vidim kada su ljudi u nečemu. Hoćete li predložiti da ne možete otvoriti slučaj ovde i pitati kazino zašto sam primljen i zašto je novac prihvaćen kada sam iz određenog regiona sa ograničenim pristupom? Izgleda kao zataškavanje koje nije u skladu sa vašom navodnom 'vizijom'. Da li pokušavate da im pokrijete leđa legitimnim masama, i idete protiv svoje jasne politike da ovo nije u dobroj veri? Zemlje imaju stroge zakone za zaštitu ljudi. Da li vam je stalo do poštenja? Ovo su grabežljivci za koje treba da arbitrirate.
Neću biti zataškan, dozvolite da se ovo odigra pre nego što namerno izbegnete sopstvenu politiku.
Ne kažete nekolicini pobednika da izgleda da je trebalo da znaju bolje i da urade više istraživanja kao što ste vi pokušali sa mnom. Da li je to zato što ne znaju da su uopšte opljačkani + ima finansijskog smisla igrati na ovaj način? Mislim da je tako. Pa opet, molim vas, otvorite kofer.
Čini se da vam ne smeta što se igra na jedan način, ali kada je drugi način koji je manje povoljan za misteriozne bogove kockanja kažete da sam ja kriv? Da, to se ne uklapa sa mnom i ne predstavlja nikakvu pravičnost za koju tvrdite da imate osim ako ovo ne rešimo kako treba tako što dobijem puni povraćaj novca i nastavim svojim putem. Vidim ovu situaciju vrlo jasno, obećavam vam.
Ako je neko zlonamerno i protivzakonito uzeo moj novac, vraćam ga. Tvrdite pravičnost? Dokažite da niste u timu kockarskih timova i pošteno otvorite ovaj slučaj. Znaš da sam u pravu u svakom pogledu. Predlažem da ne budete saučesnici na način na koji ste u ovoj konkretnoj situaciji,
Ako zatvorite ovaj slučaj, to jednostavno dokazuje da u najmanju ruku nepravedno favorizujete sajtove za kockanje. Vaši pokušaji, da tako kažem, idu u prilog njima samo kada na to gledate objektivno kao što sam ja uradio gore. Bez igara molim. Ovo bi trebalo da bude pošteno mesto za arbitražu. Ponašaj se ovako. Siguran sam da hoćete nakon svih ovih pojašnjenja.
1 dolar ukraden je 1 dolar previše. Prva stvar koja mi je ukradena je moje dostojanstvo, tako da sam ovde da to vratim, što očigledno dolazi zajedno sa 15.307 funti,
Plašite se da vidite kako neće imati ni jedno valjano objašnjenje za ovo dok istovremeno tvrde da su legitimni? Kako bi bilo da mi samo vrate novac i problem se završava,
Možeš da preusmeriš, ja vidim kroz,
Pozdravi,
Cameron
Your own position, another quote:
Our position
It is not acceptable to let players gamble if a casino knows that they are from a restricted country...
Many casinos claim that this is difficult or impossible to implement into their systems, but it is simply about comparing the player's country of residence with the list of restricted or allowed countries; therefore, we do not consider it to be that difficult on a technological level.
I will let you now do the right thing which is to open a case. All of this has been documented.
Of course this fits under the bracket of accepting me from a restricted country knowingly. It is a clear cut case.
Not only was this not acceptable, it was illegal if I am not refunded (no valid UK license), so yeah a full refund of losses is the minimum I deserve for the hell this situation caused this year by Goldenbet and their predatory behaviour towards myself.
If a bookie wants to claim legitimacy and legality, as one would hopefully presume they would rectify a players losses if when found to be taken in bad faith with no license that allowed it, as losses are more common found in gambling anyway over winnings. So if a player wins that can be clawed, but if a player is stolen from everybody is supposed to be quiet? Which could implicate that there is a preference over helping a designated smaller group of people who skirt the law rather than the majority who follow it. Do you see where I am going with this?
Of course Goldenbet or any other bookie wouldn't have to face these potential issues and legal complaints if they simply did not wilfully do things in extreme bad faith - intentionally of course. I mean how do you think I found them? They target people with specific dangerous advertising via 'independent' review sites mainly. No GAMSTOP etc. That sounds like circumvention to me for the worst possible reasons.
Life ruining stuff, don't defend it. This is why you exist.
Thankfully I have faith in due process & the law & people
Think carefully before you state you can't open a claim as you will be going against your very clear position. The United Kingdom is a restricted country towards this casino. I can guarantee that their licence forbodes it and they are circumventing their own license agreement & breaking UK law by intentionally targeting and accepting UK customers in bad faith.
Just like a license forbids other things that you cover also, you're here to help... or should be at least... Clear cut case like I said, you wrote it black and white.
Your job is supposed to be exposing this potential behaviour and arbitrating it fairly. This is not out of the scope of your own policy. I can see when people are in on something. Are you going to suggest you can't open a case here and ask the casino why I was accepted and why money was accepted when I am from a certain restricted region? Seems like a coverup not in line with your supposed 'vision'. Are you trying to cover their back against the legitimate masses, and go against your own clear policy that it is not in good faith whatsoever to do this? Countries have strict laws to protect people. You care about fairness? These are the predators you need to arbitrate.
I will not be covered up, let this play out before you intentionally avoid your own policy.
You don't tell the few winners it seems that they should have known better and done more research like you tried with me. Is it because they don't know they were robbed in the first place + it makes financial sense to play it this way? I think so. So again, I ask, open the case.
It seems you don't mind it played one way, but when it's the other way which is less favourable for the mysterious gambling gods you say it's my fault? Yeah that doesn't fly with me and doesn't equate to any fairness you claim you have unless we can get this resolved properly with me getting a full refund and going on my way. I see this situation very clearly I promise you.
If someone has taken my money in bad faith and illegally, I am getting it back. You claim fairness? Prove you're not on the gambling teams team and open this case fairly. You know I am right in every single way. I would suggest not being complicit in the way you are in this particular situation,
If you close this case it quite simply proves that you are unfairly favouring the gambling sites at the very least. Your attempts so to speak only favours them when you look at it objectively as I have done above. No games please. This is supposed to be a fair arbitration site. Act like this. I am sure you will after all this clarification.
a $1 stolen is a $1 too much. Number one thing stolen from me is my dignity, so I am here to get that back, that obviously comes along with the £15,307,
Scared to see how they won't have a single valid explanation for this whilst simultaneously claiming legitimacy? How about they just refund me and the problem ends,
You can divert, I see through,
Regards,
Cameron
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: