Kazino Baloo.bet
Hvala vam na odgovoru i što ste potvrdili da je igračev nalog sada zatvoren.
Primećujem da ste se pozvali na vaše Uslove i odredbe u vezi sa zatvaranjem naloga. Međutim, nakon pregleda relevantnog odeljka na vašoj veb stranici, čini se da se odredba koju ste citirali odnosi na opšte zatvaranje naloga. U ovom slučaju, igrač nije tražio standardno zatvaranje naloga, već trajno samoisključenje zbog zavisnosti od kockanja, što zahteva drugačiji i hitniji pristup.
U skladu sa prihvaćenim industrijskim standardima, kao i našim Kodeksom o fer kockanju , zahtevi za samoisključenje na osnovu zavisnosti od kockanja treba da se tretiraju sa najvećim prioritetom i da se sprovedu bez nepotrebnog odlaganja. Kao opšte pravilo, smatramo da je do tri dana razuman vremenski rok za kazino da obradi i sprovede takav zahtev.
Svako odlaganje nakon toga izlaže ranjivog igrača kontinuiranoj aktivnosti kockanja i riziku od daljih gubitaka, što je upravo ono što mere odgovornog kockanja treba da spreče. Po našem mišljenju, ukoliko igrač nastavi da uplaćuje depozite i kocka se zato što zahtev za samoisključenje nije sproveden u razumnom roku, kazino ne bi ispunio obaveze zaštite igrača.
Stoga savetujemo kazinima da razmotre povraćaj svih depozita koje je igrač izvršio između njihovog početnog zahteva za zatvaranje i stvarnog datuma zatvaranja njihovog naloga. Želeo bih da vam predložim ovo rešenje na razmatranje u ovoj konkretnoj situaciji. Hvala vam na razumevanju i pažnji posvećenoj ovom važnom pitanju.
Baloo.bet Casino
Thank you for your response and for confirming that the player's account has now been closed.
I note that you have referred to your Terms and Conditions concerning account closure. However, having reviewed the relevant section on your website, it appears that the provision you quoted relates to general account closure. In this case, the player was not requesting a standard account closure but rather permanent self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, which requires a different and more urgent approach.
In line with accepted industry standards, as well as our Fair Gambling Codex, requests for self-exclusion based on gambling addiction should be treated with the highest priority and implemented without unnecessary delay. As a general rule, we consider up to three days to be a reasonable timeframe for a casino to process and enforce such a request.
Any delay beyond that exposes a vulnerable player to continued gambling activity and the risk of further losses, which is precisely what responsible gambling measures are intended to prevent. In our view, where a player continues to deposit and gamble because a self-exclusion request was not implemented within a reasonable period, the casino would have fallen short of player protection obligations.
Therefore, we advise casinos to consider refunding any deposits made by the player between their initial request for closure and the actual date their account was closed. I would like to propose this solution for your consideration in this particular situation. Thank you for your understanding and attention to this important matter.
Automatski prevedeno: