Dragi svi,
Nakon temeljne diskusije unutar našeg tima za žalbe i razmatranja svih dokaza koje smo uspeli da prikupimo, došli smo do sledećeg zaključka:
Razmatramo postojanje i primenu klauzule F. Zabranjene radnje
3. „Nepravilni obrasci igranja" označavaju sledeće aktivnosti:
• na ruletu, u sledećim slučajevima: (a) pokrivanje 24 ili više od 37 dostupnih brojeva; iz uslova korišćenja kazina, kao nepravedno .
Iako razumemo da je odgovornost svakog igrača da pažljivo pročita i razume uslove i odredbe pre registracije svog naloga i da se pridržava ovih smernica, oslanjanje isključivo na igrače da pročitaju, zapamte i poštuju prilično dugačku listu mogućih ograničenja daleko je od jednostavnog ili efikasnog rešenja. U našoj misiji da promovišemo bezbedno i fer okruženje za kockanje i za igrače i za operatere, ne smatramo da je fer poništiti dobitke kada igrač nenamerno prekrši pravila koja su, u mnogim vrhunskim kazinima, već automatski primenjena na nivou softvera.
U Casino Guru-u, verujemo da negovanje transparentnosti i pravičnosti zahteva proaktivniji pristup kazina u sprovođenju ograničenja igara.
Prema nalazima eCOGRA-e, primarni problem je bio u tome što je igrač kladio na više od 24 od 37 brojeva u određenim rundama ruleta.
U Kazino Guruu, procenjujemo takve slučajeve ne samo na osnovu strogog tumačenja pravila kazina, već i imajući na umu pravičnost. Naše dugogodišnje iskustvo je pokazalo da nisu svi uslovi i odredbe inherentno prilagođeni igračima, a neki se čak mogu smatrati predatorskim. Prema našem Kodeksu za fer kockanje , ne smatramo određena pravila pravičnim; stoga im ne pristupamo sa „slepim" fokusom isključivo na propise.
Kao što smo pomenuli u našem stavu o zabrani obrazaca i strategija klađenja
Primer 4
„Igra ruleta sa niskim rizikom gde igrač ulaže jednake uloge za crno/crveno ili par/nepar, pokrivajući 25 ili više od 37 brojeva na stolu. (Postavljanje opklada na crno/crveno pokriva samo 36 od 37 mogućih brojeva)." ne pruža igraču nikakvu nepravednu prednost.
Opklade sa niskim rizikom neće biti profitabilne za igrača na duži rok. Kazino uvek ima prednost kuće, čak i u igri ruleta sa niskim rizikom; stoga, ne smatramo da je konfiskacija igračevog dobitka fer, s obzirom na to da je igrač i dalje rizikovao gubitak, a kazino je zadržao prednost kuće. Ovo je posebno relevantno kada se bavite aktivnostima koje uključuju pravi novac bez ikakvih povezanih bonusa.
Ljubazno molimo tim kazina da ponovo razmotri svoju odluku i pridruži nam se u nastojanju da obezbedimo bezbedno i fer okruženje za kockanje i za igrače i za operatere.
Dear All,
After a thorough discussion within our complaint team and consideration of all the evidence we were able to gather, we have come to the following conclusion:
We consider the existence and implementation of Clause F. Prohibited Actions
3. "Irregular Playing Patterns" shall mean the following activities:
• on roulette, in the following cases: (a) covering 24 or more of the 37 available numbers; from the casino's terms and conditions, to be unfair.
While we understand that it is the responsibility of each player to thoroughly read and understand the terms and conditions prior to registering their account and to comply with these guidelines, however, relying solely on players to read, memorise, and comply with quite a long list of possible restrictions is far from a user-friendly or effective solution. In our mission to promote a safe and fair gambling environment for both players and operators, we do not consider it fair to void winnings when a player unintentionally breaches rules that are, in a lot of top casinos, already enforced automatically at the software level.
At Casino Guru, we believe that fostering transparency and fairness requires a more proactive approach from casinos in enforcing game restrictions.
According to eCOGRA's findings, the primary issue involved the player placing bets on more than 24 out of 37 numbers in certain roulette rounds.
At Casino Guru, we assess such cases not only based on a strict interpretation of the casino's rules but also with fairness in mind. Our years of experience have shown that not all terms and conditions are inherently player-friendly, and some may even be considered predatory. As per our Fair Gambling Codex, we do not regard certain rules as equitable; thus, we do not approach them with a "blind" focus solely on the regulations.
As we mentioned in Our Position on Banning Betting Patterns and Strategies
Example 4
"low-risk roulette play where the player bets equal stakes for both black/red or even/odd covering 25 or more out of 37 numbers on the table. (Placing bets on black/red only covers 36 of 37 possible numbers)." do not provide a player with any unfair advantage.
Low-risk bets will not be profitable for the player in the long run. The casino always has a house edge, even in a low-risk roulette play; thus, we don't consider confiscation of the player's winnings as fair, considering that the player was still taking the risk of losing and the casino maintained a house edge. This is particularly relevant when engaging in activities involving real money without any associated bonuses.
We are kindly asking the casino team to reconsider their decision and join us in our effort to provide a safe and fair gambling environment for both players and operators.
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: