Naslov: BetNjet – 6.000 evra je zaduženo, ali depoziti su odbijeni i nikada nisu uplaćeni
Zdravo,
Želeo bih da zatražim pomoć LCB-a u vezi sa ozbiljnim sporom oko plaćanja sa BetNjet-om u ukupnom iznosu od 6.000 evra.
Uplatio sam tri depozita od po 2.000 evra koristeći svoju bankovnu karticu. Punih 6.000 evra je uspešno skinuto sa mog bankovnog računa, ali depoziti nikada nisu uplaćeni na moj BetNjet nalog.
BetNjet-ovi sopstveni zapisi pokazuju da su pokušaji depozita „odbijeni".
Više puta sam kontaktirao BetNjet i dostavio bankovnu dokumentaciju kojom dokazujem da je novac zaista skinut sa mog računa.
BetNdžet me je naknadno obavestio da su transakcije pregledane i da ih je odbio dobavljač plaćanja, navodeći da sam BetNdžet nikada nije primio sredstva.
Međutim, 6.000 evra mi nikada nije vraćeno.
Ovo ostavlja veoma važno nerešeno pitanje: ako je novac skinut sa mog bankovnog računa, BetNjet je evidentirao depozite kao odbijene, a BetNjet kaže da nikada nije primio sredstva, gde je otišlo 6.000 evra?
Moja bankovna dokumentacija takođe sadrži opise trgovaca/plaćanja povezane sa spornim transakcijama, uključujući Cool-Pic. Cool-Pic javno identifikuje svoju kompaniju kao GIMURTEX LIMITED (registarski broj kompanije u Velikoj Britaniji 16117528).
Želim da budem veoma jasan da ne tvrdim, bez dokaza, da je GIMURTEX zadržao moj novac. Molim BetNjet da pravilno ispita lanac plaćanja i identifikuje uključenog dobavljača/pribavitelja plaćanja i utvrdi gde su sredstva na kraju poravnana.
Uložio sam više pokušaja da ovo rešim direktno sa BetNjet-om. Kontaktirao sam podršku putem e-pošte i ćaskanja uživo i dostavio relevantnu dokumentaciju, ali još uvek nisam dobio zadovoljavajuće rešenje niti povraćaj 6.000 evra.
Zbog nedostatka rešenja, pokrenut je i sudski postupak pred Sudom za zaštitu životne sredine Porto u Portugalu, slučaj 287/2026-JP, u koji su uključeni BetNjet i GIMURTEX LIMITED.
Ipak, ostajem potpuno spreman da ovo pitanje rešim mirnim putem ako BetNjet pravilno ispita transakcije i organizuje povraćaj 6.000 evra.
S poštovanjem molim LCB da kontaktira predstavnika BetNjet-a i zatraži da se slučaj eskalira odeljenju za plaćanja/finansije BetNjet-a.
Mogu da pružim LCB-u prateće dokaze, uključujući:
Bankovni izvodi koji pokazuju tri zaduženja od po 2.000 evra;
BetNjet evidencija pokazuje da su pokušaji depozita odbijeni;
E-poruke i ćaskanje sa BetNjet-om;
Izjave kompanije BetNjet da su transakcije propale na strani provajdera plaćanja i da BetNjet nije primio sredstva;
Dokumentacija koja se odnosi na opise trgovaca;
Dokaz mojih pokušaja da direktno rešim stvar.
Ne tražim bonus ili ponovno otvaranje naloga. Tražim da se pravilno prati i vrati 6.000 evra koji su napustili moj bankovni račun i nikada nisu uplaćeni na moj BetNjet nalog.
Veoma bih cenio pomoć LCB-a u dobijanju suštinskog odgovora od predstavnika BetNjet-a.
Hvala vam.
Subject: BetNjet – €6,000 debited but deposits rejected and never credited
Hello,
I would like to request LCB's assistance regarding a serious payment dispute with BetNjet involving a total amount of €6,000.
I made three deposits of €2,000 each using my bank card. The full €6,000 was successfully debited from my bank account, but the deposits were never credited to my BetNjet account.
BetNjet's own records show the deposit attempts as "rejected."
I contacted BetNjet repeatedly and provided bank documentation proving that the money was actually debited from my account.
BetNjet subsequently informed me that the transactions had been reviewed and that they were rejected on the payment provider's side, stating that BetNjet itself never received the funds.
However, the €6,000 was never returned to me.
This leaves a very important unresolved question: if the money was debited from my bank account, BetNjet recorded the deposits as rejected, and BetNjet says it never received the funds, where did the €6,000 go?
My bank documentation also contains merchant/payment descriptors connected with the disputed transactions, including Cool-Pic. Cool-Pic publicly identifies its company as GIMURTEX LIMITED (UK Company No. 16117528).
I want to be very clear that I am not claiming, without evidence, that GIMURTEX retained my money. I am asking BetNjet to properly investigate the payment chain and identify the payment provider/acquirer involved and determine where the funds were ultimately settled.
I have made numerous attempts to resolve this directly with BetNjet. I have contacted support by email and live chat and supplied the relevant documentation, but I have still not received a satisfactory resolution or the return of the €6,000.
Due to the lack of resolution, legal proceedings have also been initiated before the Julgado de Paz do Porto in Portugal, case 287/2026-JP, involving BetNjet and GIMURTEX LIMITED.
Nevertheless, I remain fully willing to resolve this matter amicably if BetNjet investigates the transactions properly and arranges the return of the €6,000.
I respectfully ask LCB to contact the BetNjet representative and request that the case be escalated to BetNjet's Payments/Finance department.
I can provide LCB with supporting evidence, including:
Bank statements showing the three €2,000 debits;
BetNjet records showing the deposit attempts as rejected;
Emails and chat conversations with BetNjet;
BetNjet's statements that the transactions failed on the payment provider's side and that BetNjet did not receive the funds;
Documentation concerning the merchant descriptors;
Evidence of my attempts to resolve the matter directly.
I am not asking for a bonus or account reopening. I am asking for the €6,000 that left my bank account and was never credited to my BetNjet account to be properly traced and returned.
I would greatly appreciate LCB's assistance in obtaining a substantive response from the BetNjet representative.
Thank you.
Automatski prevedeno: