Ovaj kazino ima odvojene račune za pravi novac i bonus novac.
Uplatio sam 1.000 dolara i dobio bonus od 1.000 dolara.
Nakon što sam potvrdio da je kockice igra koja dozvoljava bonus, igrao sam i uspešno unovčio 3.400 dolara.
Međutim, kazino je kasnije tvrdio da je to zapravo bila nepodobna igra i konfiskovao je tih 3.400 dolara.
Takođe sam koristio kockice sa bonusom neposredno pre ovoga i nakon toga sam izvršio podizanje, ali kazino tada nije ništa rekao.
Nepravedno je od njih da odjednom tvrde da je to bila nepodobna igra tek nakon što sam uspeo da unovčim veliku sumu.
S obzirom na to da se nove igre stalno dodaju u kazina, uobičajen je pristup verovanju sistemu koji pokazuje „da li zaista možete da igrate sa bonusom", umesto oslanjanja na uslove i odredbe koji mogu biti nepotpuni.
Štaviše, ističe se da „avijatičar" nije naziv igre već žanra, i da je opštepoznato među onima koji razumeju sisteme igara da kockice spadaju u ovu kategoriju.
Nisam mogao da verujem ovom kazinu, pa sam odmah povukao svoj dug od oko 1.000 dolara i podneo žalbu.
Insistiram na vraćanju oduzetih 3.400 dolara.
Štaviše, iako kazino tvrdi da je provajder odgovoran, nesumnjivo je da je kazino taj koji je dodao igru na svoju stranicu i učinio bonus dostupnim.
Ako insistirate da je dobavljač odgovoran, onda mi pravilno vratite oduzeti iznos i tražite nadoknadu štete od dobavljača.
This casino has separate accounts for real money and bonus money.
I deposited $1,000 and received a $1,000 bonus.
After confirming dice was a bonus-eligible game, I played and successfully cashed out $3,400.
However, the casino later claimed it was actually an ineligible game and confiscated that $3,400.
I had also used dice with a bonus just before this, and made a withdrawal afterward, yet the casino said nothing at that time.
It's unfair for them to suddenly claim it was an ineligible game only after I succeeded in cashing out a large amount.
Considering that new games are constantly being added to casinos, it's also a common approach to trust the system that indicates ‘whether you can actually play with the bonus’ rather than relying on terms and conditions that may be incomplete.
Furthermore, it points out that ‘aviator’ is not the name of a game but rather a genre, and that it is common knowledge among those who understand game systems that dice fall under this category.
I couldn't trust this casino, so I immediately withdrew my balance of about $1,000 and filed a complaint.
I insist on the return of the confiscated $3,400.
Furthermore, while the casino claims the provider is responsible, it is undeniably the casino that added the game to its site and made the bonus available.
If you insist the provider is liable, then properly refund me the confiscated balance and seek damages from the provider.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: