Dragi kazino Kripto Palas,
Hvala vam na saradnji u ovom slučaju i na pružanju informacija i dokaza neophodnih za potpunu i uravnoteženu procenu situacije.
Dragi Edvarde / Edlover43,
Kao što je već pomenuto, primio sam i pregledao informacije i dokaze koje je dostavio kazino, uključujući i vaš kompletan dnevnik igara. Na osnovu ove dokumentacije, zaista je došlo do kršenja pravila o maksimalnoj opkladi, kao što ste sada, verujem, mogli i sami da vidite.
Aktiviranje bonus kupovine predstavlja namernu akciju igrača koja zahteva određenu aktivaciju i stoga se ne može razumno smatrati nenamernim ili slučajnim događajem.
U skladu sa opštom praksom u industriji, bonus kupovina (takođe poznata kao „Kupovina sa bonusom") smatra se jednom opkladom ili transakcijom klađenja. Izborom ove funkcije, igrač plaća povećani iznos uloga unapred kako bi odmah dobio pristup bonus rundi, umesto da je pokreće kroz standardnu igru.
Važeći uslovi korišćenja kazina navode sledeće:
Maksimalna dozvoljena opklada sa aktivnim bonus kodom dobrodošlice je 9 USDT. Ako se postavi opklada veća od 9 USDT, svi dobici će biti nevažeći. (Ova vrednost od 9 USDT uključuje sve sporedne opklade, funkcije udvostručavanja, funkcije kockanja i svaku dodatnu opkladu od originalne opklade/uloge.)
Štaviše, naš stav prema Kodeksu o fer kockanju: Naši stavovi o problematičnim oblastima je sledeći:
„Pravilo o maksimalnoj opkladi za bonus je industrijski standard, kao i pravo kazina da konfiskuje dobitke ostvarene bonus igrom nakon kršenja ovog pravila. Generalno ne smatramo da je prikladno kažnjavati kazina zbog sprovođenja utvrđenih industrijskih standarda."
Na osnovu pregledanih dokaza, runda u kojoj je došlo do kršenja maksimalne opklade rezultirala je dobicima. Ovi dobici su takođe doprineli ispunjavanju uslova klađenja i činili su deo sredstava koja su na kraju konvertovana u iznos koji se može isplatiti. Kao takvo, kršenje je pružilo prednost koja ne bi bila dostupna da su se poštovali promotivni uslovi.
U svetlu gore navedenih nalaza, nismo u mogućnosti da zaključimo da je kazino postupao nepravedno ili na način koji nije u skladu sa njegovim utvrđenim pravilima i uslovima, koje ste prihvatili prilikom registracije i korišćenja usluge. Iako sam se nadao da se može postići konsenzus sa timom kazina, ne mogu im zameriti što su postupali u skladu sa njihovim utvrđenim pravilima i procedurama.
Kao nezavisna služba za rešavanje sporova, ostajemo nepristrasni i ne zauzimamo stranu. Naša uloga je da procenimo raspoložive dokaze i donesemo zaključak isključivo na osnovu predstavljenih činjenica. Iako naša procena nije ograničena samo na utvrđivanje da li je došlo do tehničkog kršenja i uzimamo u obzir i širi kontekst svakog slučaja, ne možemo zanemariti uticaj i implikacije koje takvo kršenje ima na situaciju. Nakon temeljnog pregleda okolnosti ovog slučaja, nisam identifikovao nikakve osnove koji bi opravdali drugačiji ishod.
Pošto su razlozi koji su istakli kazina i našu odluku objašnjeni u meri dozvoljenoj u okviru naše uloge nezavisnog posrednika u sporovima, ova žalba će sada biti zatvorena kao odbijena .
Za buduće potrebe, toplo vam preporučujem da pažljivo pregledate i pridržavate se svih važećih uslova korišćenja kazina i promotivnih odredbi pre nego što učestvujete u bonus ponudama, jer to može pomoći u izbegavanju sličnih situacija.
Ukoliko u budućnosti naiđete na bilo kakve probleme sa ovim ili bilo kojim drugim kazinom, slobodno nas kontaktirajte. Uvek ćemo se truditi da pravedno razmotrimo stvar i pružimo pomoć koliko god možemo.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Mihal
Kazino Guru
Dear Crypto Palace Casino,
Thank you for your cooperation in this case and for providing the information and evidence necessary to enable a full and balanced assessment of the situation.
Dear Edward / Edlover43,
As previously mentioned, I received and reviewed the information and evidence provided by the casino, including your complete game log. Based on this documentation, there was indeed a breach of the maximum bet rule, as you have now been able to see for yourself, I believe.
The activation of a Bonus Buy constitutes a deliberate player action which requires a specific activation and, therefore, cannot reasonably be regarded as an unintentional or coincidental event.
In line with general industry practice, a Bonus Buy (also referred to as a "Feature Buy") is considered a single wager or betting transaction. By selecting this feature, the player pays an enhanced stake amount upfront in order to gain immediate access to a bonus round, rather than triggering it through standard gameplay.
The casino's applicable terms and conditions state the following:
The max bet permitted with an active welcome bonus code is USDT9. If a bet of more than USDT9 is placed, all winnings will be void. (This USDT9 value is inclusive of all side bets, double-up features, gamble features and any additional bet from the original wager/bet placed.)
Furthermore, our position under the Fair Gambling Codex: Our Views on Problematic Areas is as follows:
"The bonus maximum bet rule is an industry standard, as is the casino's right to confiscate winnings derived from bonus play following a breach of this rule. We generally do not consider it appropriate to penalize casinos for enforcing established industry standards."
Based on the evidence reviewed, the round in which the maximum bet violation occurred resulted in winnings. These winnings also contributed towards the completion of the wagering requirements and formed part of the funds ultimately converted into withdrawable balance. As such, the breach provided an advantage that would not have been available had the promotional terms been adhered to.
In light of the above findings, we are unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or in a manner inconsistent with its established rules and conditions, which were accepted by you upon registration and use of the service. While I had hoped that a consensus could be reached with the casino team, I am unable to hold it against them for acting in accordance with their established rules and procedures.
As an independent dispute resolution service, we remain impartial and do not take sides. Our role is to assess the available evidence and reach a conclusion based solely on the facts presented. While our assessment is not limited solely to establishing whether a technical violation occurred and we also take into account the broader context of each case, we cannot disregard the impact and implications that such a violation has on the situation. Following a thorough review of the circumstances of this case, I have not identified any grounds that would justify a different outcome.
As the reasons underlying the casinos and our decision have been explained to the extent permissible within our role as an independent dispute mediator, this complaint will now be closed as Rejected.
For future reference, I strongly encourage you to carefully review and adhere to all applicable casino terms and promotional conditions before participating in bonus offers, as doing so may help avoid similar situations.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us. We will always endeavour to review the matter fairly and provide assistance to the best of our abilities.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: