Dragi/a Qazwsxcderfv,
Pokušao sam da kontaktiram kazino u više navrata; međutim, kao što se i očekivalo, to nije rezultiralo značajnim napretkom.
Kao što sam već napomenuo, iako priznajemo da svaki kazino ima pravo da prekine pružanje usluga igraču po sopstvenom nahođenju, sve preostale finansijske obaveze moraju prvo biti izmirene. Konfiskacija dobitaka treba da bude potkrepljena jasnim dokazima o kršenju Uslova i odredbi kazina ili drugim legitimnim i dobro utemeljenim razlozima.
Na osnovu do sada dostupnih informacija, obrazloženje koje je dao kazino deluje neskladno sa transparentnim i fer pristupom koji snažno zagovaramo u industriji.
Nažalost, tim kazina nije pokazao spremnost da se konstruktivno uključi u rešavanje ovog pitanja. Zbog toga, nemam drugog izbora nego da vašu žalbu zaključim kao Nerešenu – Protiv fer kockanja .
Razumem da ovo nije zadovoljavajuće rešenje za vaš problem. Međutim, nerešene žalbe negativno utiču na ocenu kazina, što može podstaći operatera da preispita svoj pristup. Ukoliko kazino odluči da se dalje angažuje, ponovo ćemo otvoriti žalbu i obavestiti vas putem e-pošte.
Pošto kazino posluje bez licence za igre na sreću i ne nudi nikakvu uslugu alternativnog rešavanja sporova (ARS), nažalost, ne postoji regulatorno telo kojem bi se ovo pitanje moglo eskalirati. Jedina preostala opcija može biti razmatranje pravnog postupka u vašoj jurisdikciji; međutim, to je van našeg dometa pomoći.
Pored toga, toplo preporučujem oprez i izbegavanje kazina navedenih pod Auwin Partnership.

jer izgleda da njima upravlja isti entitet i postoji visok rizik od nailaženja na slične probleme.
Za budućnost, preporučujem vam da birate kazina na osnovu nezavisnih recenzija i ocena, i da birate samo dobro ocenjene i pravilno licencirane operatere kako biste smanjili rizik od sličnih situacija.
Žao mi je što nismo bili u mogućnosti da pružimo više pomoći u vezi sa ovim pitanjem.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Mihal
Kazino Guru
Dear Qazwsxcderfv,
I have attempted to contact the casino on multiple occasions; however, as anticipated, this did not result in any meaningful progress.
As I previously mentioned, while we acknowledge that any casino has the right to discontinue providing services to a player at its discretion, any outstanding financial obligations must first be settled. The confiscation of winnings should be supported by clear evidence of a breach of the casino’s Terms and Conditions or by other legitimate and well-substantiated grounds.
Based on the information available thus far, the reasoning provided by the casino appears inconsistent with the transparent and fair approach that we strongly advocate for within the industry.
Regrettably, the casino team has not demonstrated a willingness to engage constructively in resolving this matter. As a result, I have no option but to conclude your complaint as Unresolved – Against Fair Gambling.
I understand this isn't a satisfactory solution to your issue. However, unresolved complaints negatively impact a casino’s rating, which may encourage the operator to reconsider its approach. Should the casino decide to engage further, we will reopen the complaint and notify you by email.
As the casino operates without a gaming license and does not reference any alternative dispute resolution (ADR) service, there is unfortunately no regulatory authority available to which this matter can be escalated. The only remaining option may be to consider legal action within your jurisdiction; however, this falls outside our scope of assistance.
Additionally, I strongly recommend exercising caution and avoiding the casinos listed under Auwin Partnership

as they appear to be operated by the same entity, and there is a high risk of encountering similar issues.
For the future, I encourage you to select casinos based on independent reviews and ratings, and to choose only well-rated and properly licensed operators to minimize the risk of similar situations.
I regret that we were unable to provide more assistance in this matter.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno: