Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa kompanijom Get Slots i njihovim postupanjem u vezi sa mojim postojećim samoisključenjem.
Želim da bude jasno da se ova žalba ne odnosi na opšte rizike povezane sa kockanjem, niti tvrdim da ne bi trebalo da budem odgovoran za svoju odluku o kockanju. Moja žalba se konkretno odnosi na postupanje kazina sa samoisključenjem koje je već bilo na snazi, a koje je Get Slots naknadno potvrdio.
Moje samoisključenje iz operatera licence za internet igre u Anžuanu bilo je na snazi više od dve nedelje pre nego što sam pristupio platformi Get Slots.
Uprkos tome, Get Slots mi je omogućio pristup kazinu, uplatu sredstava i kockanje. Ukupno sam uplatio 1.050 dolara.
Otprilike sat vremena nakon što sam počeo da igram, Get Slots je potvrdio moje postojeće samoisključenje i potom zatvorio/ograničio moj nalog.
Ovo je ključno pitanje: kazino je priznao da je postojalo moje samoisključenje, ali tek nakon što mi je dozvolio da igram i prihvatio 1.050 dolara od mene.
Ako je moje samoisključenje bilo validno i primenljivo na Get Slots, onda mi uopšte nije trebalo dozvoliti da pristupim kazinu i uplatim depozite. Činjenica da je kazino na kraju priznao isključenje ne menja činjenicu da je već prihvatio moje depozite i dozvolio mi da se kockam otprilike sat vremena.
Nakon toga, Get Slots je takođe zatražio moje bankovne podatke, koje sam i dostavio. Međutim, uprkos tome što su priznali situaciju i zatražili moje bankovne podatke, sada nisam dobio nikakvo smisleno ažuriranje ili rešenje.
Stoga verujem da imam pravo na povraćaj 1.050 dolara koje sam uplatio nakon što me je samoisključenje trebalo sprečiti da pristupim kazinu.
Ponovo želim da naglasim da se ne žalim na samo kockanje niti pokušavam da izbegnem odgovornost za gubitke od kockanja samo zato što kockanje nosi rizik. Problem je u tome što sam već preduzeo konkretan korak samoisključivanja, to isključenje je bilo aktivno više od dve nedelje, a Get Slots je to na kraju i sam priznao.
Kazino ne bi trebalo da bude u mogućnosti da prihvati moje depozite, dozvoli mi da se kockam sat vremena, a tek nakon toga da prizna i sprovede samoisključenje.
Molim Casino Guru da istraži da li je Get Slots pravilno poštovao moje postojeće samoisključenje i, ako nije, da li bi trebalo u potpunosti vratiti 1.050 dolara uplaćenih tokom perioda u kojem je trebalo da budem isključen.
Jednostavno tražim pravedno rešenje i povraćaj 1.050 dolara koji su mi prihvaćeni uprkos mom već aktivnom i naknadno priznatom samoisključenju.
I am submitting this complaint regarding Get Slots and their handling of my existing self-exclusion.
I want to make it very clear that this complaint is not about the general risks associated with gambling, nor am I claiming that I should not be responsible for my decision to gamble. My complaint is specifically about the casino's handling of a self-exclusion that was already in place and that Get Slots subsequently acknowledged.
My self-exclusion from Anjouan Internet Gaming License operators had been in place for more than two weeksbefore I accessed Get Slots.
Despite this, Get Slots allowed me to access the casino, deposit funds, and gamble. I deposited a total of $1,050.
Approximately one hour after I began playing, Get Slots acknowledged my existing self-exclusion and subsequently closed/restricted my account.
This is the key issue: the casino acknowledged that my self-exclusion existed, but only after allowing me to play and accepting $1,050 from me.
If my self-exclusion was valid and applicable to Get Slots, then I should not have been permitted to access the casino and make deposits in the first place. The fact that the casino eventually recognized the exclusion does not change the fact that it had already accepted my deposits and allowed me to gamble for approximately an hour.
Following this, Get Slots also requested my banking information, which I provided. However, despite acknowledging the situation and requesting my banking information, I have now been left without a meaningful update or resolution.
I therefore believe I am entitled to the return of the $1,050 I deposited after my self-exclusion should have prevented me from accessing the casino.
Again, I want to emphasize that I am not making a complaint about gambling itself or attempting to avoid responsibility for gambling losses simply because gambling involves risk. The issue is that I had already taken the specific step of self-excluding, that exclusion had been active for over two weeks, and Get Slots ultimately acknowledged it themselves.
The casino should not be able to accept my deposits, allow me to gamble for an hour, and then only recognize and enforce the self-exclusion afterward.
I am asking Casino Guru to investigate whether Get Slots properly honoured my existing self-exclusion and, if not, whether the $1,050 deposited during the period in which I should have been excluded should be refunded in full.
I am simply seeking a fair resolution and the return of the $1,050 that was accepted from me despite my already-active and subsequently acknowledged self-exclusion.
Automatski prevedeno: