Hvala vam što ste mi dozvolili da odgovorim.
Cenim što je GG.BET potvrdio žalbu, ali njihova izjava i dalje ne rešava suštinski problem: nerazumno dugo povlačenje bez konkretnog objašnjenja, bez vremenskog okvira i sa kontradiktornim informacijama koje su mi pružene tokom celog procesa.
1. „U obradi" u odnosu na stvarni status
GG.BET više puta navodi da se isplata „obrađuje". Međutim, 16. decembra, podrška uživo me je eksplicitno obavestila da je isplata još uvek u „novom" statusu, što znači da uopšte nije ušla u aktivnu obradu.
Ovo direktno protivreči tvrdnji da je transakcija bila u fazi aktivnog preispitivanja.
Ova kontradikcija nikada nije rešena.
2. Obrazloženje zasnovano na pravilima ostaje nejasno
GG.BET ponovo pominje „regulatorne standarde i procedure interne bezbednosti", ali i dalje ne objašnjava:
• koja se konkretna provera vrši,
• zašto je ovo povlačenje izazvalo ovu pojavu,
• ili zašto nisu traženi dodatni dokumenti ako su provere bile potrebne.
Pozivanje na interna pravila bez njihove primene na činjenice ovog slučaja ne predstavlja transparentnost.
3. Dužina odlaganja ostaje nerazumna
Povlačenje je pokrenuto 29. novembra.
Do danas, kašnjenje je prešlo dve nedelje.
Iako Pravilo 8.3.1 dozvoljava promenljivo vreme obrade, ono ne opravdava neodređena odlaganja, niti objašnjava zašto bi povlačenje ostalo neaktivno tokom tako dugog perioda bez eskalacije, pojašnjenja ili preduzimanja mera.
4. Prethodna uspešna povlačenja nisu sporna
GG.BET napominje da su prethodna isplaćivanja bila uspešna. Slažem se — i upravo zato je ovo kašnjenje zabrinjavajuće.
Istorija uspešnih povlačenja ne opravdava:
• trenutno produženo kašnjenje,
• nedosledna objašnjenja,
• ili odsustvo vremenskog okvira.
Ako ništa drugo, moja istorija bi trebalo da podrži brže rešavanje, a ne produženu neizvesnost.
5. Pominjanje prethodno otkazane transakcije je irelevantno
GG.BET pominje raniju transakciju koja je otkazana zbog neslaganja u stanju na računu. Ta transakcija je rešena i nije predmet ove žalbe.
Trenutni spor se tiče posebnog povlačenja koje je ostalo neisplaćeno. Uvođenje nepovezanih prošlih događaja ne objašnjava sadašnje kašnjenje.
6. Ključno pitanje ostaje nerešeno
Ukratko, nerešena pitanja su:
• Neizmirena isplata od 29. novembra
• Kontradiktorne informacije o tome da li je obrada uopšte počela
• Nema jasnog objašnjenja vezanog za konkretne provere
• Nije naveden vremenski okvir
• Ponovljeno oslanjanje na nejasne interne procedure
Ne tvrdim da sam bio u lošoj veri. Zahtevam razumno, transparentno rukovanje mojim sredstvima, što se još nije dogodilo.
S poštovanjem molim da medijacija podstakne GG.BET da:
1. Potvrdite da li je povlačenje ušlo u aktivnu obradu
2. Identifikujte svaku specifičnu proveru koja trenutno sprečava objavljivanje
3. Obezbedite razuman vremenski rok za završetak
4. Obradite i odmah objavite povlačenje ako ne postoji problem
I dalje sam spreman da ovo rešim mirnim putem i cenim pomoć medijatora u razjašnjavanju i rešavanju ovog pitanja.
Thank you for allowing me to respond.
I appreciate GG.BET’s acknowledgment of the complaint, but their statement still fails to address the core issue: an unreasonably prolonged withdrawal with no concrete explanation, no timeline, and contradictory information provided to me throughout the process.
1. "Being processed" vs. actual status
GG.BET repeatedly states that the withdrawal is "being processed." However, on December 16, live support explicitly informed me that the withdrawal was still in "new" status, meaning it had not entered active processing at all.
This directly contradicts the claim that the transaction has been under active review.
This contradiction has never been addressed.
2. Rule-based justification remains vague
GG.BET again references "regulatory standards and internal security procedures," but still does not explain:
• what specific check is being performed,
• why this withdrawal triggered it,
• or why no additional documents were requested if checks were required.
Citing internal rules without applying them to the facts of this case does not constitute transparency.
3. Length of delay remains unreasonable
The withdrawal was initiated on November 29.
As of today, the delay has exceeded two weeks.
While Rule 8.3.1 allows for variable processing times, it does not justify indefinite delays, nor does it explain why a withdrawal would remain idle for such an extended period without escalation, clarification, or action.
4. Prior successful withdrawals are not in dispute
GG.BET notes that previous withdrawals were successful. I agree — and that is precisely why this delay is concerning.
A history of successful withdrawals does not justify:
• the current prolonged delay,
• inconsistent explanations,
• or the absence of a timeframe.
If anything, my history should support faster resolution, not prolonged uncertainty.
5. Mention of a previously canceled transaction is irrelevant
GG.BET references an earlier transaction that was canceled due to a balance discrepancy. That transaction was resolved and is not the subject of this complaint.
The current dispute concerns a separate withdrawal that remains unpaid. Introducing unrelated past events does not explain the present delay.
6. Core issue remains unresolved
To summarize, the unresolved issues are:
• A withdrawal outstanding since November 29
• Conflicting information about whether processing has even begun
• No clear explanation tied to specific checks
• No timeframe provided
• Repeated reliance on vague internal procedures
I am not alleging bad faith. I am requesting reasonable, transparent handling of my funds, which has not yet occurred.
I respectfully request that mediation encourage GG.BET to:
1. Confirm whether the withdrawal has entered active processing
2. Identify any specific check currently preventing release
3. Provide a reasonable timeframe for completion
4. Process and release the withdrawal promptly if no issue exists
I remain willing to resolve this amicably and appreciate the mediator’s assistance in bringing clarity and closure to this matter.
Automatski prevedeno: