ZVANIČNA ŽALBA – KAZINO RILSON
Predmet: Nepostupanje po ponovljenom zahtevu za zatvaranje naloga i zabrinutosti u vezi sa odgovornim igranjem
Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa neuspehom kazina Reelson da postupi po mojim ponovljenim zahtevima za trajno zatvaranje mog naloga zbog zabrinutosti u vezi sa odgovornim igranjem.
U protekla dva dana, više puta sam i jasno zahtevao da se moj Reelson Casino nalog zatvori. Kontaktirao sam Reelson putem ćaskanja uživo u više navrata i poslao sam više od 15 odvojenih imejlova sa zahtevom da se moj nalog zatvori.
Svaki put kada sam kontaktirao ćaskanje uživo, rečeno mi je da moram da pošaljem imejl da bih zatražio zatvaranje. Više puta sam sledio ta uputstva. Uprkos tome, moj nalog je ostao otvoren i nisam dobio nikakav smislen odgovor kojim bi se potvrdilo da je moj zahtev obrađen.
Ovo je posebno zabrinjavajuće jer moj zahtev nije samo rutinsko zatvaranje naloga. Aktivno pokušavam da ukinem svoj pristup kockanju jer shvatam da mi je potrebno da zatvorim nalog.
Umesto da budem zaštićen od daljeg kockanja, i dalje sam mogao da pristupim nalogu, uplatim sredstva i igram.
Zbog toga što Rilson nije reagovao na moje višestruke zahteve za zatvaranje, potrošio sam više od 1.500 dolara u kazinu tokom ovog perioda.
Želim da budem potpuno jasan da nisam tek tako odlučio nakon kockanja da želim da mi se nalog zatvori. Proaktivno sam kontaktirao Rilson i više puta ih tražio da zatvore nalog. Učinio sam više od 15 pokušaja putem e-pošte i dodatnih zahteva putem ćaskanja uživo, ali je nalog i dalje dostupan.
Ovo je izuzetno zabrinjavajuće sa stanovišta odgovornog igranja.
U informacijama o odgovornom igranju kompanije Reelson navodi se da samoisključenje odmah deaktivira igračev nalog i sprečava depozite fiat valute dok je isključenje aktivno. Takođe se navodi da igrači mogu kontaktirati Reelson putem ćaskanja uživo ili imejla kako bi utvrdili ograničenja odgovornog igranja.
Stoga sam pratio kanale koje sam Reelson pruža za pomoć u vezi sa odgovornim igranjem, ali moj nalog nije bio zatvoren.
Zahtevam da se ovo pitanje formalno istraži i da Rilson dostavi:
Kompletan zapis aktivnosti na mom računu i depozitima tokom perioda koji počinje od mog prvog zahteva za zatvaranje/samoisključenje računa.
Zapis svakog imejla i zahteva za ćaskanje uživo koje sam uputio u vezi sa zatvaranjem naloga.
Datumi i vremena kada su ti zahtevi primljeni i/ili im je pristupljeno.
Objašnjenje zašto je moj nalog ostao otvoren nakon što sam više puta zahtevao zatvaranje.
Objašnjenje zašto sam više puta upućivan na podršku putem e-pošte kada sam već poslao više od 15 e-poruka i nisam dobio nikakav odgovor.
Potvrda o tome kada je moj nalog zapravo onemogućen i trajno zatvoren.
Pregled depozita i aktivnosti kockanja koje su se dogodile nakon mog prvog jasnog zahteva za zatvaranje računa.
Razmatranje povraćaja sredstava uloženih i izgubljenih nakon što je podnet moj zahtev za odgovorno igranje/zatvaranje naloga, a Rilson nije postupio po njemu.
Čuvam sve imejlove, snimke ekrana, razgovore uživo, vremenske oznake i aktivnosti naloga kao dokaz mojih pokušaja da se nalog zatvori.
Takođe želim da se zabeleži da sam potražio pomoć od Rilsona pre nego što sam nastavio da se kockam. Više puta sam pokušavao da uklonim svoj pristup nalogu. Činjenica da sam i dalje mogao da uplaćujem depozite i kockam se nakon što sam podneo te zahteve je upravo razlog zašto podnosim ovu žalbu.
Molim da se ovo pitanje tretira kao odgovorno igranje i samoisključenje, a ne kao rutinska žalba na korisničku podršku.
Očekujem da Rilson pregleda celu istoriju komunikacije i aktivnosti naloga i da pruži suštinski odgovor u kojem će se objasniti zašto moji ponovljeni zahtevi nisu bili odgovoreni.
Spreman sam da pružim kompletan lanac imejlova, snimke ekrana ćaskanja uživo, istoriju transakcija na nalogu i svu drugu dokumentaciju potrebnu za utvrđivanje vremenskog okvira.
Više puta sam pokušavao da se sprečim da se kockam. Rilson je imao više prilika da postupi po tim zahtevima, ali nije.
Molim da se ovo pitanje shodno tome ispita i da se na odgovarajući način razmotre gubici nastali nakon što je podnet moj zahtev za zatvaranje računa.
FORMAL COMPLAINT – REELSON CASINO
Subject: Failure to Act on Repeated Account Closure Request and Responsible Gaming Concerns
I am submitting this complaint regarding Reelson Casino’s failure to act on my repeated requests to permanently close my account due to responsible-gaming concerns.
For the past two days, I have repeatedly and clearly requested that my Reelson Casino account be closed. I have contacted Reelson through live chat on multiple occasions and have sent more than 15 separate emails requesting that my account be closed.
Every time I have contacted live chat, I have been told that I must send an email to request the closure. I have followed those instructions repeatedly. Despite this, my account remains open and I have received no meaningful response confirming that my request has been processed.
This is particularly concerning because my request is not simply a routine account closure. I have been actively trying to remove my access to gambling because I recognize that I need the account closed.
Instead of being protected from further gambling, I have remained able to access the account, deposit funds and play.
As a result of Reelson’s failure to act on my repeated closure requests, I have spent more than $1,500 at the casino during this period.
I want to make it absolutely clear that I did not simply decide after gambling that I wanted my account closed. I proactively contacted Reelson and repeatedly asked them to close the account. I made more than 15 attempts by email and additional requests through live chat, yet the account has remained accessible.
This is extremely concerning from a responsible-gaming perspective.
Reelson’s own Responsible Gaming information states that self-exclusion immediately disables a player’s account and prevents fiat currency deposits while the exclusion is active. It also states that players can contact Reelson through Live Chat or email to establish responsible-gaming limits.
I therefore followed the channels Reelson itself provides for responsible-gaming assistance, yet my account was not closed.
I am requesting that this matter be formally investigated and that Reelson provide:
A complete record of my account activity and deposits during the period beginning with my first account-closure/self-exclusion request.
A record of every email and live-chat request I made regarding account closure.
The dates and times those requests were received and/or accessed.
An explanation as to why my account remained open after I repeatedly requested closure.
An explanation as to why I was repeatedly directed to email support when I had already sent more than 15 emails and received no response.
Confirmation of when my account was actually disabled and permanently closed.
A review of the deposits and gambling activity that occurred after my first clear request for account closure.
Consideration of reimbursement of the funds deposited and lost after my responsible-gaming/account-closure request was made and while Reelson failed to act on it.
I am preserving all emails, screenshots, live-chat conversations, timestamps and account activity as evidence of my attempts to have the account closed.
I also want it placed on record that I sought help from Reelson before continuing to gamble. I repeatedly attempted to remove my own access to the account. The fact that I was still able to deposit and gamble after making those requests is precisely why I am raising this complaint.
I am asking for this matter to be treated as a responsible-gaming and self-exclusion failure, rather than as a routine customer-service complaint.
I expect Reelson to review the complete communication history and account activity and provide a substantive response addressing why my repeated requests were not acted upon.
I am prepared to provide the complete email chain, screenshots of the live chats, account transaction history and any other documentation required to establish the timeline.
I made repeated attempts to stop myself from gambling. Reelson had multiple opportunities to act on those requests and did not.
I am requesting that this matter be investigated accordingly and that appropriate consideration be given to the losses incurred after my account-closure request was made.
Automatski prevedeno: