Tražim povraćaj 3.730 evra neto gubitka od kazina Sankra jer me kazino nije samoisključio nakon što sam ih eksplicitno obavestio da imam problem sa kockanjem.
Dana 12. jula 2026. godine, poslao sam imejl podršci za Sankra sa moje registrovane imejl adrese:
„Pido cerrar mi cuenta. Tengo problemas con juego."
(„Molim vas da mi zatvorite račun. Imam problema sa kockanjem.")
Sankra je primila moj zahtev. Umesto da mi blokira nalog, njihov VIP menadžer Lucija mi je ponudila ograničenja depozita kako bih mogla da nastavim sa kockanjem i zadržim svoj VIP status. Odbila sam to i jasno odgovorila: „Cerrar" („Zatvori"). Zatim mi je ponuđena privremena pauza umesto trajnog zatvaranja.
Ovo je takođe u suprotnosti sa Sankrinom politikom odgovornog kockanja, koja navodi da se samoisključenje može zahtevati putem support@sankra.com i da će račun biti zatvoren u roku od 24 sata.
Moj nalog je ostao aktivan. Čak i nakon što sam otkrio svoj problem sa kockanjem, dobijao sam VIP bonuse i promocije povrata novca.
Pošto nisam bio isključen, ponovo sam počeo da se borim i izgubio sam približno 1.450 evra.
Dana 17. avgusta, ponovo sam eksplicitno zatražio TRAJNO SAMOISKLjUČENjE i izjavio da NE želim ograničenja depozita, hlađenje ili privremenu pauzu.
Račun još uvek nije bio zatvoren.
Prvog septembra, VIP menadžer Romen je ponovo potvrdio moj zahtev za trajno samoisključenje, ali je još jednom ponudio alternative kao što su jednomesečna pauza, ograničenja depozita i mogućnost odlaganja.
Moj nalog je ostao aktivan.
9. septembra sam ponovo recidivirao. Sankra mi je i dalje dozvolila da izvršim više uspešnih depozita putem Google Pay-a i izgubio sam još oko 800 evra. Imam snimke ekrana koji prikazuju transakcije, datume, vremena i ID-ove transakcija.
12. septembra, tačno DVA MESECA nakon što sam Sankri rekao da imam problem sa kockanjem i zamolio ih da mi zatvore račun, on je JOŠ UVEK bio aktivan i primao je depozite.
Ponovo sam se vratio u igru i izgubio približno 1.480 evra. Imam snimke ekrana iz istorije plaćanja kompanije Sankra koji prikazuju uspešne depozite 12. septembra, uključujući transakcije od 300, 300, 80 i 200 evra, sa vremenskim oznakama i ID-ovima transakcija.
Stoga, moji identifikovani neto gubici nakon mog zahteva za samoisključenje su:
1.450 € + 800 € + 1.480 € = 3.730 €.
Nisam podizao novac tokom ovih epizoda kockanja. Novac je uplaćen i izgubljen kroz kockanje.
Imam dokaze o celoj hronologiji: moj originalni imejl od 12. jula u kojem se pominje moj problem sa kockanjem, Sankrine odgovore, moje ponovljene zahteve za trajno samoisključenje, VIP komunikaciju, promocije poslate nakon mog otkrivanja, Sankrinu politiku samoisključenja u trajanju od 24 sata i istoriju plaćanja koja dokazuje da su nastavili da prihvataju moje depozite.
Da je Sankra sprovela moje samoisključenje kada je to zatraženo, ovi gubici ne bi mogli da se dogode.
Molim:
1. Trajno samoisključivanje mog naloga.
2. Povraćaj od 3.730 evra neto gubitaka nastalih nakon što je moje samoisključenje trebalo da bude sprovedeno.
3. Trajni prekid svih promocija kockanja.
Mogu da pružim sve imejlove, snimke ekrana i evidenciju transakcija kao dokaz.
I am requesting a refund of €3,730 in net losses from Sankra Casino because the casino failed to self-exclude me after I explicitly informed them that I had a gambling problem.
On 12 July 2026, I emailed Sankra support from my registered email address:
"Pido cerrar mi cuenta. Tengo problemas con juego."
("I ask you to close my account. I have gambling problems.")
Sankra received my request. Instead of blocking my account, their VIP Manager Lucia offered me deposit limits so I could continue gambling and keep my VIP status. I rejected this and replied clearly: "Cerrar" ("Close it"). I was then offered a temporary break instead of permanent closure.
This also contradicts Sankra’s own Responsible Gambling policy, which states that self-exclusion can be requested through support@sankra.com and that the account will be closed within 24 hours.
My account remained active. Even after I disclosed my gambling problem, I received VIP bonuses and cashback promotions.
Because I was not excluded, I relapsed and lost approximately €1,450.
On 17 August, I again explicitly requested PERMANENT SELF-EXCLUSION and stated that I did NOT want deposit limits, cooling-off or a temporary pause.
The account was still not closed.
On 1 September, VIP Manager Romain again acknowledged my permanent self-exclusion request but once more offered alternatives such as a one-month pause, deposit limits and cooling-off.
My account remained active.
On 9 September, I relapsed again. Sankra still allowed me to make multiple successful deposits through Google Pay and I lost approximately another €800. I have screenshots showing the transactions, dates, times and transaction IDs.
On 12 September, exactly TWO MONTHS after telling Sankra that I had a gambling problem and asking them to close my account, it was STILL active and accepting deposits.
I relapsed again and lost approximately €1,480. I have screenshots from Sankra’s payment history showing successful deposits on 12 September, including €300, €300, €80 and €200 transactions, with timestamps and transaction IDs.
Therefore, my identified net losses after my self-exclusion request are:
€1,450 + €800 + €1,480 = €3,730.
I made NO withdrawals during these gambling episodes. The money was deposited and lost through gambling.
I have evidence of the entire chronology: my original 12 July email mentioning my gambling problem, Sankra’s replies, my repeated permanent self-exclusion requests, VIP communications, promotions sent after my disclosure, Sankra’s 24-hour self-exclusion policy, and payment histories proving that they continued accepting my deposits.
Had Sankra implemented my self-exclusion when requested, these losses could not have occurred.
I request:
1. Permanent self-exclusion of my account.
2. Refund of €3,730 in net losses incurred after my self-exclusion should have been implemented.
3. Permanent cessation of all gambling promotions.
I can provide all emails, screenshots and transaction records as evidence.
Automatski prevedeno: