Želeo bih da Casino Guru ovo razmotri kao posebnu žalbu na odgovorno kockanje/zatvaranje naloga, koja nije povezana sa mojim prethodnim sporom od 7.050 evra.
Dana 25. jula 2026. godine, više puta sam tražio od WinBeast-a da zatvori/blokira moj nalog. Jedan od mojih zahteva je eksplicitno navodio:
„Možete li, molim vas, blokirati moj nalog kako više nikada ne bih mogao da igram ovde."
Nakon toga sam nekoliko puta ponovio svoj zahtev za zatvaranje.
Takođe sam više puta obavestio WinBeast da sam registrovan u CRUKS-u, holandskom nacionalnom registru samoisključenja iz kockanja. Stoga je WinBeast bio upoznat sa mojim postojećim samoisključenjem, a istovremeno je primao višestruke zahteve za trajno blokiranje mog naloga.
WinBeast je potvrdio moje zahteve. 27. jula mi je rečeno:
„Zatvaranje naloga je nešto što samo vaš VIP menadžer ima ovlašćenje da obradi."
Dana 30. jula, WinBeast je ponovo potvrdio da je moj zahtev za zatvaranje prosleđen mom VIP menadžeru.
Uprkos tome, moj nalog nije zatvoren.
Sedmog avgusta, moj VIP menadžer mi je konačno rekao:
„Nemam tehničku mogućnost da zatvorim vaš nalog. Najbolji pristup bi bio da se jednostavno odjavite i uzdržite se od prijavljivanja ili igranja."
U istoj poruci, obećao je:
„Da bih vam pomogao u odluci i osigurao da ne padnete u iskušenje, odmah ću isključiti vaš nalog iz svih naših marketinških i promotivnih kampanja."
Međutim, WinBeast me je naknadno nastavio kontaktirati sa podsticajima za kockanje.
Dana 22. avgusta, dobio sam personalizovanu VIP promociju koja me je podstakla da uplatim 30 evra u zamenu za 100 besplatnih okretaja. Kasnije sam dobio dodatne personalizovane poruke koje su me podstakle da se vratim kockanju, bonusi su dodati na moj račun i ponuđen mi je povrat novca povezan sa depozitima od 1.000 evra, 2.500 evra i 5.000 evra.
Najvažnije je da je moj nalog ostao u potpunosti funkcionalan. Moja istorija transakcija pokazuje da je WinBeast 24. avgusta, nekoliko nedelja nakon mog prvog zahteva za zatvaranje, i dalje primao depozite od mene, uključujući 999 evra i 251 evro.
Ne tvrdim da sam eksplicitno napisao reči „Imam zavisnost od kockanja". Moja žalba se zasniva na dokumentovanim činjenicama:
Više puta sam tražio trajno zatvaranje/blokiranje naloga.
Posebno sam tražio da me blokiraju kako „više nikada ne bih mogao da igram ovde".
Više puta sam obavestio WinBeast da sam registrovan u CRUKS-u, nacionalnom registru samoisključenja iz kockanja.
WinBeast je potvrdio moje zahteve za zatvaranje, ali nije zatvorio moj nalog.
WinBeast je obećao da će prestati sa marketingom kako bi se osigurao da ne budem „u iskušenju".
Uprkos tom obećanju, WinBeast mi je naknadno poslao personalizovane podsticaje za kockanje i depozit.
WinBeast je nastavio da prima depozite sa mog računa.
Priložio sam snimke ekrana koji dokumentuju ove događaje.
Stoga bih želeo da Casino Guru proceni da li je WinBeast postupio na odgovarajući način u skladu sa principima odgovornog kockanja time što nije postupio po mojim ponovljenim zahtevima za zatvaranje naloga i naknadno nastavio da me dozvoljava i aktivno podstiče na kockanje.
I would like Casino Guru to review this as a separate responsible gambling/account closure complaint, unrelated to my previous €7,050 dispute.
On 25 July 2026, I repeatedly asked WinBeast to close/block my account. One of my requests explicitly stated:
"Can you please block my account so I can never play here again."
I repeated my closure request several times afterwards.
I had also repeatedly informed WinBeast that I was registered in CRUKS, the Dutch national gambling self-exclusion register. Therefore, WinBeast was aware of my existing self-exclusion while also receiving repeated requests to permanently block my account.
WinBeast acknowledged my requests. On 27 July, I was told:
"Closing an account is something only your VIP manager has the authority to process."
On 30 July, WinBeast again confirmed that my closure request had been forwarded to my VIP manager.
Despite this, my account was not closed.
On 7 August, my VIP manager finally told me:
"I don't have the technical option to close your account. The best approach would be to simply log out and refrain from logging in or playing."
In the same message, he promised:
"To help support your decision and ensure you aren't tempted, I will immediately exclude your account from all our marketing and promo campaigns."
However, WinBeast subsequently continued contacting me with gambling incentives.
On 22 August, I received a personalised VIP promotion encouraging me to deposit €30 in exchange for 100 free spins. I later received further personalised messages encouraging me to return to gambling, bonuses were added to my account, and I was offered cashback linked to deposits of €1,000, €2,500 and €5,000.
Most importantly, my account remained fully operational. My transaction history shows that on 24 August, weeks after my first closure request, WinBeast was still accepting deposits from me, including €999 and €251.
I am not claiming that I explicitly wrote the words "I have a gambling addiction." My complaint is based on the documented facts:
I repeatedly requested permanent account closure/blocking.
I specifically asked to be blocked so I could "never play here again."
I repeatedly informed WinBeast that I was registered in CRUKS, a national gambling self-exclusion register.
WinBeast acknowledged my closure requests but did not close my account.
WinBeast promised to stop marketing to ensure I was not "tempted."
Despite that promise, WinBeast subsequently sent me personalised gambling and deposit incentives.
WinBeast continued accepting deposits from my account.
I have attached screenshots documenting these events.
I would therefore like Casino Guru to assess whether WinBeast acted appropriately under responsible gambling principles by failing to act on my repeated account closure requests and subsequently continuing to allow and actively encourage me to gamble.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: