Hvala vam na odgovoru. Međutim, smatram da postoje ključne tačke koje nisu u potpunosti razmotrene.
Iako cenim da je kazino preduzeo mere nakon mog zahteva za samoisključivanje, moja glavna briga leži u metodu koji je kazino koristio za obradu depozita. Konkretno, upotreba netačnih MCC kodova za zaobilaženje kockarskih blokova nametnutih mojom standardnom Visa/Mastercard karticom, koju sam omogućio za odgovorno kockanje. Ova praksa nije samo pitanje efikasnosti samoisključenja, već i ozbiljno kršenje zakona i propisa u vezi sa odgovornim praksama kockanja.
Kao igrač registrovan iz zemlje u kojoj usluge kazina ne bi trebalo da budu dostupne, zbunjen sam kako mi je uopšte bilo dozvoljeno da igram. Moja početna zabrinutost, koju sam izneo u svom prvom zahtevu za povraćaj sredstava, bila je o tome kako je kazino uspeo da obradi depozite uprkos bloku za kockanje koji sam imao. Ovo mi je omogućilo da nastavim da igram, uprkos mojim naporima da ograničim pristup kockanju na svom nalogu.
Zabrinjavajuće je što ovo ključno pitanje u vezi sa obradom plaćanja nije uzeto u obzir u vašem odgovoru, jer podriva mere zaštite koje samoisključivanje i alati za odgovorno kockanje treba da obezbede. Pozvao bih kazino da preispita ovu praksu kako bi osigurao usklađenost sa zakonima o kockanju i zadržao pošteno i odgovorno okruženje za kockanje.
Hvala vam na pažnji prema ovom pitanju.
Takođe, prošlo je više od 2 nedelje otkako sam poslao svoju poslednju poštu njihovom timu za podršku i nisam dobio nikakav odgovor od njih, ignorišu me i na mejlu i na njihovom ćaskanju uživo.
Thank you for your response. However, I feel that there are key points which have not been fully considered.
While I appreciate that the casino took action after my self-exclusion request, my main concern lies with the method the casino used to process deposits. Specifically, the usage of incorrect MCC codes to bypass gambling blocks imposed by my standard Visa/Mastercard card, which I had enabled for responsible gambling. This practice is not only an issue of self-exclusion effectiveness but also a serious violation of laws and regulations regarding responsible gambling practices.
As a player registered from a country where the casino’s services should not be available, I am perplexed as to how I was even allowed to play in the first place. My initial concern, which I raised in my first refund request, was about how the casino managed to process deposits despite the gambling block that I had in place. This effectively allowed me to continue playing, despite my efforts to restrict access to gambling on my own account.
It is troubling that this crucial issue regarding payment processing was not considered in your response, as it undermines the protection measures that self-exclusion and responsible gambling tools are meant to provide. I would urge the casino to review this practice to ensure compliance with gambling laws and uphold a fair and responsible gambling environment.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Also, it's been more than 2 weeks since I sent my last mail to their support team and I haven't recieved any response from them, they ignore me both on mail and on their support live chat.
Automatski prevedeno: