Iznosim ovaj slučaj na forum kako bih istakao uznemirujuću seriju događaja u kojima su učestvovali Immerion i Ybets. Ovo nije samo „tehnička greška"; to je veliki upozoravajući znak u vezi sa privatnošću podataka igrača i integritetom operatera.
Hronologija „grešaka"
1. Povlačenje novca putem „The Ghost"-a: Dobio sam zahtev za proveru klijenta (KYC) od kazina Immerion u kojem se tvrdi da je moj „zahtev za povlačenje" pauziran. Nisam igrao tamo 3 meseca i nikada nisam tražio povlačenje.
2. Ista imejl adresa: Nekoliko minuta kasnije, dobio sam identičan KYC imejl od Ybets-a — kazina u kojem nikada nisam imao nalog.
3. Priznanje: ybets mi je pismeno potvrdio da su imejlovi „poslati greškom" i da takav način isplate ili Ybets nalog ne postoji.
Moje brige
Kako dva odvojena brenda mogu tako besprekorno da dele status mog specifičnog naloga i podatke o e-pošti da pokreću istovremene, identične i lažne KYC procedure?
• GDPR/kršenje zaštite privatnosti podataka: Moji podaci su očigledno procureli ili deljeni između ovih operatera bez mog pristanka. Ako nemam nalog na Ybets-u, ne bi trebalo da imaju moju adresu e-pošte u bazi podataka koja može da pokrene KYC upozorenja.
• Zatvaranje iz odmazde: Čim sam insistirao na objašnjenju u vezi sa ovim pogrešnim rukovanjem podacima i zatražio povraćaj novca na osnovu kršenja uslova, Immerion je odlučio da zatvori moj nalog umesto da obezbedi transparentnost.
Operatoru kazino gurua
Podneo sam žalbu i tražio povraćaj novca, ali guru kazina je to odbio, a odbrana operatera da je ovo „samo pitanje privatnosti", a ne „problem sa gubitkom u kockanju", je zgodan način da se izbegne odgovornost. Kada operater pokaže da ne može bezbedno da upravlja podacima, to dovodi u pitanje pravičnost celog njihovog softverskog steka.
Moja pitanja za zajednicu i moderatore:
1. Da li je ovo „normalno"?: Od kada je prihvatljivo slati KYC trigere na nepostojeće naloge?
2. Pravni lekovi: Pored standardne žalbe, koje su mogućnosti da se subjekti sa licencom Kurasaa (ili slični) pozovu na odgovornost za očigledna kršenja pravila o deljenju podataka?
3. Zatvaranje naloga: Da li forum smatra „dobrom praksom" da kazino ućutka igrača zatvaranjem naloga čim se pokrene legitimna zabrinutost za privatnost?
Tražim potpunu istragu o tome kako je Ybets dobio moje podatke i ponovno razmatranje mog zahteva za povraćaj novca, jer je ugovor između igrača i operatera prekršen u trenutku kada su moji podaci zloupotrebljeni.
I am bringing this case to the forum to highlight a disturbing series of events involving Immerion and Ybets. This isn't just a "technical glitch"; it is a massive red flag regarding player data privacy and operator integrity.
The Timeline of "Errors"
1. The Ghost Withdrawal: I received a KYC demand from Immerion casino claiming my "withdrawal request" was paused. I haven't played there in 3 months and never requested a withdrawal.
2. The Twin Email: Minutes later, I received an identical KYC email from Ybets—a casino where I have never held an account.
3. The Admission: ybets confirm me in writing that the emails were "sent in error" and that no such withdrawaw or Ybets account exists.
My Concerns
How can two separate brands share my specific account status and email data so seamlessly that they trigger simultaneous, identical, and false KYC procedures?
• GDPR/Data Privacy Breach: My data has clearly been leaked or shared between these operators without my consent. If I don't have an account at Ybets, they should not have my email address in a database capable of triggering KYC alerts.
• Retaliatory Closure: As soon as I pressed for an explanation regarding this data mishandling and requested a refund based on the breach of terms, Immerion chose to close my account rather than provide transparency.
To the Casino Guru Opetator
I make complaint and asked for refund and Casino guru Denied it and The operator’s defense that this is "only a privacy issue" and not a "gambling-loss issue" is a convenient way to dodge accountability. When an operator demonstrates they cannot manage data securely, it calls into question the fairness of their entire software stack.
My Questions for the Community and Moderators:
1. Is this "Normal"?: Since when is it acceptable to spam KYC triggers to non-existent accounts?
2. Remedies: Beyond a standard complaint, what are the avenues for holding Curacao-licensed (or similar) entities accountable for blatant data-sharing violations?
3. Account Closure: Does the forum consider it "Good Practice" for a casino to silence a player by closing their account the moment a legitimate privacy concern is raised?
I am seeking a full investigation into how Ybets obtained my data and a reconsideration of my refund request, as the contract between player and operator was breached the moment my data was mishandled.




