Zdravo, GinoS,
Dozvolite mi da vam ukratko rezimiram žalbu, pa, reputacija kazina za početak. Pre svega, njegova trenutna ocena je samo 2,5, tako da bih se klonio toga.
U osnovi, to odražava pregled žalbi, gde možemo videti 5 do sada podnetih slučajeva, 3 su već zatvorena kao nerešena, jedan je rešen, ali putem automatske funkcije bez pozivanja predstavnika kazina. Poslednji igrač je ostao nem, pa je slučaj zatvoren jer je „Igrač prestao da odgovara".
Ono što se čini posebno vrednim pažnje, barem meni, jesu nerešeni slučajevi: dva puta „nerešen slučaj", a treći je zatvoren zbog „nedovoljnih dokaza iz kazina".
Neizvestan ishod slučaja zasniva se na činjenici da je igrač odbio da dostavi izvod iz banke kazinu, a u drugom slučaju, kazino je tražio da se slučaj ponovo otvori, a zatim ponovo nije pravilno odgovorio... Detalji u završnom rezimeu:
„Suočili smo se sa kazinom i ohrabrili ih da ponovo razmotre slučaj, primetivši spremnost igrača da sarađuje i da su izmene dokumenata očigledno napravljene kako bi se razjasnile nedostajuće informacije, a ne da bi se obmanuli. Kazino je ponovo otvorio slučaj radi dodatnog pregleda, ali ga je na kraju zatvorio nakon što nije dalje odgovorio. Zatvorili smo žalbu kao nerešenu, priznajući pravo kazina da sprovodi pravila, ali dovodeći u pitanje srazmernost njihovih postupaka s obzirom na okolnosti."
Inače, svi ti igrači su iz Holandije.
Nadam se da će to pomoći na bilo koji način.
Hello, GinoS,
let me give you a brief recap of the complaint, well, the casino's reputation to begin with. First of all, its current score is only 2.5, so I would stay away.
Basically it reflects the complaint overview, where we can see 5 cases lodged thus far, 3 already closed as unresolved, one resolved but through the autofeature withoutinviting the casino representative in. The last player remained silent, and thus the case was closed as "Player stopped responding".
What seems particularly noteworthy, at least to me, are the unresolved cases: two times "unresolved case," and the third was closed as "insufficient evidence from the casino"
The uncertain case result is based on the fact that the player refused to provide a bank statement to the casino and in the second case, the casino asked for the case to be reopened and then once more failed to respond properly... Details in the closing sumary:
"We engaged with the casino and encouraged them to reconsider the case, noting the player’s willingness to cooperate and that document alterations appeared to have been made to clarify missing information rather than to deceive. The casino reopened the case for additional review but ultimately closed it after failing to respond further. We closed the complaint as unresolved, acknowledging the casino’s right to enforce rules but questioning the proportionality of their actions given the circumstances."
All those players hail from the Netherlands, by the way.
Hope it helps in any way.
Automatski prevedeno: