Mislim da bi to mogla biti jedna od mogućnosti, da.
Kasnije prošle godine, došlo je do pritužbe, a zanimljivo je bilo to što je kazino insistirao da igrač neće dobiti kriptovalute jer kazino nije bio u redu sa načinom na koji je ovaj igrač kupio kriptovalute putem razmene. Dakle, pod pretpostavkom da je ovaj igrač uvek deponovao samo kriptovalute i bio uključen u povlačenje u kripto, kazino je nastavio kao da govorimo o zajedničkom izvoru sredstava, AML procedurama.
Samo vidim sličnosti, iako nisam upoznat sa vašom trenutnom situacijom. Da li i vi to vidite? Mogu da grešim, naravno.
I think it could be one of the possibilities, yes.
Later on last year, there was a complaint, and the interesting part was that the casino insisted the player wouldn't get the crypto winnings because the casino was not okay with the way this particular player bought the crypto through exchange. So, assuming this player has always only deposited by crypto and was involved in withdrawing in crypto, the casino proceeded like we were talking about a common source of funds, the AML procedures.
I just see similarities, even though I'm not familiar with your current situation. Do you see it too? I could be wrong, of course.
Automatski prevedeno: