pre 2 godina
We wish the same to you, I hope you will do well in life. 🙂
Samoisključenje za celu Nemačku? (strana 2)
1
2
Dodajte post
pre 3 meseci
da zaista
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 3 meseci
Pitanje je kako zabraniti nešto što se ne pokreće lokalno već anonimno distribuirano preko Sixx servera, što je uobičajena praksa. Na kraju krajeva, imate mobilni telefon i možete lako pristupiti bilo kojoj veb stranici koju želite, bilo da je ilegalna ili ne. Dakle, koja je svrha zabrana ako su neefikasne?
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 3 meseci
Molim vas, izvinite na kasnom odgovoru. Kao što je moj članak stigao prilično kasno, tako je i moj odgovor zakasneo 😅.
Da, situacija u Velikoj Britaniji, kako je opisujete, zvuči prilično šizofreno; onda niste slični nemačkoj situaciji.
Pažljivije gledano, ovde je gotovo isto, osim što su igre primorane da traže fer kazina na međunarodnom nivou. U međuvremenu, većina kazina, koja obično posluju sa malteškom licencom, razvila je tendenciju da odbija nemačke igrače ili im diktira drugačije osnovne zahteve nego svima ostalima. Na primer, bonusi dobrodošlice ponekad se eksplicitno ne nude nemačkim igračima, a drugi bonusi bez depozita su generalno isključeni za nemačke igrače. Mislim da je ovo zaštitna mera kako bi se izbegle tužbe, ali ostavlja gorak ukus.
Posebno je tužno to što smo u Nemačkoj, pre ovog novog nemačkog sporazuma o kockanju, ili potpuno raselili, uništili ili prouzrokovali da se čitav niz veoma uglednih i visokokvalifikovanih međunarodnih kazina preseli i tako potpuno povuku sa nemačkog tržišta.
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 3 meseci
I believe once the player feels the urge for closing the account immediately, the self-exclusion due to gambling addiction has its meaning. However, the main problem has always remained the same in my eyes.
As the number of separate licenses increases, so do the obstacles to establishing a unified process that can be shared across those different licenses. My coworkers have been working on that for a while, as we think one shared blueprint will be more effective and better used by players and casinos. No matter whether the license is offshore or local.
I'd like to thank you for all those posts and for describing the process that set many casinos to exile. Undoubtedly, this is a contributing factor to the problem.
pre 3 meseci
Veoma je srećno što takozvana globalno obavezujuća obaveza omogućava igračima da budu isključeni na sopstveni zahtev.
Takođe mislim da ne predstavljate zapravo veliko mešanje u posao i stoga me iznenađuje što se to uopšte radi. Ako neko želi da bude blokiran, pretpostavljam da će to biti urađeno.
Trebalo bi da im bude očigledno da ne bi trebalo da se kockaju ako ne mogu da se nose sa tim ili ako ih to uništi, jer će uvek biti načina da se ponovo kockaju, bez obzira na to da li su vas svi onlajn kazina zabranili ili ne.
Onda ću jednostavno otići u običan kazino, ili ima slot mašina u nekoliko pabova!
Postoji toliko mnogo mogućnosti, i ako logično saznanje ne dođe iznutra da čovek jednostavno mora da dozvoli da se stvari dogode, onda vidim sumornu budućnost!
Srdačan pozdrav, Simon
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 3 meseci
To be honest, I'm ot sure I follow you here, and perhaps it is once more a sort of bad translation, because "It is very fortunate that a so-called globally binding obligation allows players to be excluded at their own request" or "I also think that you don't really represent a major intrusion into the business, and therefore I'm surprised that it's even being done. If someone wants to be blocked, then I assume that it will be done." seems very odd to me given your previous posts. Can you help me understand the true meaning of your words, please?
In any case, this is a very complex subject, and I prefer to respond only when I am certain I am following the correct context. I agree that people are accountable for their actions; however, the nature of all obsessive addictions directly contradicts this responsibility.
pre 3 meseci
Zdravo,
Tačno su identifikovali problem; to je greška koju je izazvala funkcija glasovnog unosa.
Zapravo, hteo sam da kažem da je pohvalno što se zalažu za globalnu politiku.
Nažalost, još uvek mi nije sasvim jasno kako da zamislim kako bi se to moglo osmisliti.
Verujem da ga već možete blokirati na vaš zahtev u svakom kazinu.
Da li sugerišete da blokiranje automatski blokira nekoga sa svih blagajni, ili koja je vaša poenta?
Nadam se da sam uspeo da razjasnim neke nedoumice!
Srdačan pozdrav, Simon
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 3 meseci
Hello,
oh I see! Now I understand you much better. Thank you.
I was attempting to convey the idea that there is no single way to self-exclude from all online casinos today.
Since each country believes it has the best approach to managing gambling, this leads to a more isolated ecosystem that maintains its own self-exclusion lists, such as OASIS and GAMSTOP.
However, for addicted players, such a situation means that they can only be protected by their national license, not any other licenses.
There are currently two basic levels of self-exclusion:
Single-operator level: Typically, when self-excluding in an online casino, the self-exclusion does not extend to other operators. This creates a problem: self-excluded players can freely access and play at other casino websites, bringing the overall effectiveness of such self-exclusion schemes into question. The Global Self-Exclusion System (GSES) was created to offer a solution that eliminates this problem.
Nationwide/license-wide level: Some countries and online gambling regulators, such as the UK, Sweden, or the Netherlands, operate wider self-exclusion schemes, which require their licensees (operators) to be part of nationwide (license-wide) self-exclusion schemes. These allow players to self-exclude from all casinos licensed in a specific country or by a specific regulator at once, creating a better level of protection.
In my opinion, industry leaders and local governments should think globally.
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 3 meseci
Zdravo,
Potpuno se slažem sa vama. Konačno moramo da razmišljamo globalno; ne samo u ovoj oblasti, već uopšte!
Bojim se da se status kvo teško može preokrenuti, i čak i ako se mnogi kazina pridržavaju zajedničkih sporazuma, i dalje će biti dovoljno onih koji rade šta žele.
Podmukla stvar u vezi sa ovim je to što će na kraju nastati ogroman konkurentski nedostatak, favorizujući nehumano ponašanje. 🤔
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 3 meseci
I will very likely sound a bit unethical, but I believe that politicians should handle politics, not regulate gambling markets; let the experts explain the side effects of fractured markets and then think that through.
My apologies, I had to say this. 🙂
In any case, you appear to be very knowledgeable, and I'm delighted to have the opportunity to speak with you.
pre 2 meseci
Zaista ne moraš da se izvinjavaš zbog toga.
Politika se odvija na lokalnom nivou i stoga je nepogodna za regulisanje decentralizovanog interneta.
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 2 meseci
It seems that we are like-minded people. As an analytical person, I find it hard to pretend that the collateral damages from country-based licenses and regulations were not predictable and avoidable.
Well, the gambling world truly needs an ultimate tool for helping addicted players easily self-exclude from casinos, at least on a license-based level.
I hope you enjoy the holiday season and once more, I appreciate your input.
1
2
Dodajte post
