Zapravo ne prihvatamo žalbe igrača na isključivo „loše" bonus ponude, jer iz naše perspektive, bonusi su dobrovoljni, a loša bonus ponuda ne znači nepoštene uslove ili zadržavanje sredstava.
Međutim, to uvek zavisi od šireg konteksta.
Na primer, kada igrač uplati depozit i automatski dobije bonus na depozit bez direktnog pristanka, nije u redu ograničavati njegovu igru uslovima bonusa zato što igrač nije prihvatio bonus.
Ili drugačija situacija: igrač uzima bonus bez depozita da bi isprobao igre — bez početnog depozita. Ispunjava sve uslove i uspeva da nešto osvoji; sredstva se prebacuju na račun pravog novca, a igrač nastavlja da igra. Međutim, kada podnese zahtev za isplatu, za isplatu je dostupan samo maksimalni iznos bonusa.
Dakle, bonus bi zaista mogao da izazove značajan problem.
We actually do not accept players' complaints on purely "bad" bonus offers, because from our perspective, bonuses are voluntary, and a bad bonus offer does not equal unfair terms or withheld funds.
However, it always depends on broader context.
For example, when a player deposits and is automatically given a deposit bonus without direct consent, it is not okay to limit his play with bonus conditions because the player did not accept the bonus.
Or a different situation: a player takes a no-deposit bonus to test out the games—no initial deposit made. He meets all the requirements and manages to win something; the funds are transferred into a real money balance, and the player keeps playing on. However, once he submits the withdrawal request, only the bonus max win amount is available for withdrawal.
So, the bonus may truly cause a significant problem.
Automatski prevedeno: