Dat ću vam primjer. Prodajete drogu ili oružje i od toga dobijete veliki novac. Očigledno, ne možete samo uplatiti gotovinu direktno na vaš bankovni račun, jer banka može od vas tražiti izvor prihoda sada ili kasnije.
U tom slučaju, možete jednostavno uplatiti novac u kazino i odmah povući. Kada bi vas banka pitala za izvor prihoda, jednostavno biste mogli tvrditi da je izvor kockanje – vaš dobitak u kazinu.
Kada na njega primijenite zahtjev za klađenje, onda to čini cijeli proces složenijim, posebno kada trebate uložiti ogromnu svotu novca.
S druge strane, zaista sam protiv bilo kakve primjene ovog pravila u slučaju kada igrač dobije od bonusa bez depozita, a kazino od vas traži da uplatite depozit kako bi mogli povući (treba da imaju uplatu metode registrovane u njihovom sistemu i to radite putem depozita). U tom slučaju, na depozit nikada ne bi trebalo da se primenjuje pravilo uslova klađenja.
Zatim postoje i drugi slučajevi u kojima to nema smisla. Recimo da uložite 100 i kladite 50 na broj 7 na ruletu. Imate sreće i osvojite 1750. U tom slučaju, razumijem ako želite povući dobitak bez klađenja početnih 100 koje ste uplatili. Ne bi imalo smisla.
I'll give you an example. You sell drugs or weapons and get some big cash from it. Obviously, you can't just deposit the cash straight to your bank account, because the bank could ask you for the source of income now or later.
In that case, you could simply deposit money into the casino and withdraw immediately. When the bank would ask you for the source of income, you could simply claim that the source is gambling - your winnings in a casino.
When you apply the wagering requirement to it, then it makes the whole process more complicated, especially when you need to wager a huge amount of money.
On the other hand, I'm really against any application of this rule in a case when the player wins from a no deposit bonus and the casino asks you to make a deposit in order to being able to withdraw (they need to have a payment method registered in their system and you do it through the deposit). In that case, there should never be a wagering requirement rule applied to the deposit.
Then there are other cases where it doesn't make sense. Let's say you deposit 100 and bet 50 on a number 7 on roulette. You're lucky and you win 1750. In that case, I understand if you want to withdraw the winnings without wagering the initial 100 that you deposited. It wouldn't make sense.
Automatski prevedeno:
