Zdravo Mihal,
Poštovani 1xBet tim,
Želeo bih jasno da odgovorim na najnoviju izjavu kazina, jer sadrži ozbiljne nedoslednosti.
Pre svega, želim da jednu stvar učinim potpuno jasnom:
Ni u jednom trenutku nisam izjavio da sam zavisnik od kockanja.
Moguće je da sam tokom komunikacije 3. avgusta 2025. godine pomenuo da mi se mentalno stanje pogoršalo. Međutim, to je bila direktna posledica višemesečnog finansijskog stresa izazvanog odbijanjem kazina da obradi moju isplatu, a ne zbog zavisnosti od kockanja.
Osećaj stresa, anksioznosti ili mentalne iscrpljenosti zbog 8-mesečnog neplaćenog povlačenja novca ne znači da je zavisnost od kockanja.
Kritična kontradikcija u objašnjenju kazina
Ovo je ključno pitanje koje otkriva neslaganje:
• Moj zahtev za povlačenje sredstava je podnet u maju 2025. godine.
• Kazino nije isplatio moja sredstva između maja i avgusta.
• Takozvana „zabrinutost zbog zavisnosti" pokrenuta je tek u avgustu, nakon višemesečnih neobjašnjivih odlaganja.
Ako je kazino zaista verovao da moja sredstva treba da budu ograničena iz razloga odgovornog kockanja, onda:
Zašto moje povlačenje novca nije obrađeno između maja i avgusta, mnogo pre nego što se ovaj avgustovski razgovor uopšte dogodio?
Vremenska linija jasno pokazuje da:
• Kašnjenje u plaćanju postojalo je pre bilo kakvog pomena o mentalnom stresu.
• Argument „odgovornog igranja" je uveden retroaktivno kako bi se opravdalo već postojeće neplaćanje.
Na tvrdnju da sam odgovorio sa „Da"
Čak i da sam u tom trenutku priznao emocionalnu patnju (što je sasvim razumljivo nakon višemesečnog ignorisanja), to ne predstavlja medicinsku dijagnozu zavisnosti od kockanja.
Kazino:
• nije medicinski autoritet,
• nema zakonsku ili stručnu kompetenciju za dijagnostikovanje zavisnosti,
• i ne mogu razumno zahtevati lekarsko uverenje na osnovu stresa izazvanog sopstvenim postupcima.
Štaviše, u mojoj zemlji ne postoji praktično ili odgovarajuće lekarsko uverenje koje se izdaje za potrebe onlajn kazina u ovom kontekstu.
Moj stav ostaje nepromenjen
• Nisam zavisnik od kockanja.
• Nikada ranije nisam bio ograničen iz razloga odgovornog igranja, uprkos godinama aktivnosti.
• Dostavio/la sam svu standardnu KYC i verifikacionu dokumentaciju.
• Stres koji sam doživeo bio je uzrokovan neplaćanjem, a ne kockarskim ponašanjem.
Ovaj zahtev se očigledno koristi kao naknadno opravdanje za uskraćivanje mojih sredstava.
Mihale, s poštovanjem te molim da proceniš ovaj slučaj na osnovu logike, vremenskih okvira i proporcionalnosti.
Objašnjenje kazina ne opravdava zašto su mi sredstva zadržana mesecima pre ovog navodnog okidača.
Ljubazno molim da se neopravdano ograničenje ukine i da se moja povlačenja isplate bez daljeg odlaganja.
Hvala vam na vašoj kontinuiranoj pažnji i pravednosti.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Serdem
Hello Michal,
Dear 1xBet Team,
I would like to respond clearly to the casino’s latest statement, as it contains serious inconsistencies.
First of all, I want to make one thing absolutely clear:
At no point have I ever stated that I am a gambling addict.
It is possible that during communication on August 3, 2025, I mentioned that my mental condition had deteriorated. However, this was a direct result of months of financial stress caused by the casino’s refusal to process my withdrawal, not because of gambling addiction.
Feeling stressed, anxious, or mentally exhausted due to an 8-month unpaid withdrawal does not equal gambling addiction.
Critical contradiction in the casino’s explanation
This is the key question that exposes the inconsistency:
• My withdrawal request was made in May 2025.
• The casino did not pay my funds between May and August.
• The so-called "addiction concern" was only raised in August, after months of unexplained delays.
If the casino truly believed that my funds should be restricted for responsible gambling reasons, then:
Why was my withdrawal not processed between May and August, long before this August conversation even occurred?
The timeline clearly shows that:
• The payment delay existed before any mention of mental stress.
• The "responsible gaming" argument was introduced retroactively to justify an already existing non-payment.
On the claim that I answered "Yes"
Even if I acknowledged emotional distress at that moment (which is completely understandable after months of being ignored), this does not constitute a medical diagnosis of gambling addiction.
The casino:
• is not a medical authority,
• has no legal or professional competence to diagnose addiction,
• and cannot reasonably demand a medical certificate based on stress caused by their own actions.
Moreover, in my country, there is no practical or appropriate medical certificate issued for online casino purposes in this context.
My position remains unchanged
• I am not a gambling addict.
• I have never been restricted for responsible gaming reasons before, despite years of activity.
• I have provided all standard KYC and verification documents.
• The stress I experienced was caused by non-payment, not gambling behavior.
This request is clearly being used as a post-factum justification to withhold my funds.
Michal, I respectfully ask you to assess this case based on logic, timelines, and proportionality.
The casino’s explanation does not justify why my funds were withheld months before this alleged trigger.
I kindly request that the unjustified restriction be lifted and my withdrawal be paid without further delay.
Thank you for your continued fairness and attention.
Kind regards,
Serdem
Automatski prevedeno: