Dragi 2UP kazino,
Hvala vam što ste mi pružili dodatne informacije i dokaze. Odgovorio sam sa nekim dodatnim pitanjima jer još uvek postoje određene tačke koje treba da razjasnim.
Dragi aleks86,
Hvala vam na odgovorima. Svestan sam da su vaši najnoviji dobici možda ostvareni bez učešća bonusa, međutim, kao što je često slučaj tokom detaljnije istrage, dodatne informacije ili dokazi u vezi sa potencijalnim kršenjem pravila mogu se otkriti tokom procesa pregleda. Stoga, činjenica da u skorije vreme niste igrali sa bonusima ne znači nužno da vaša igra više nije bila podložna važećim pravilima kazina, niti sprečava kazino da pregleda vašu prethodnu aktivnost.
Takođe je relativno standardno u industriji da, ako se otkrije da su dobici prethodno ostvareni kršenjem važećih ograničenja bonusa ili igre, ali su već isplaćeni, kazino može preispitati naknadnu igru i, tamo gde važeći uslovi i okolnosti to opravdavaju, odbiti ili poništiti naknadne dobitke kao posledicu prvobitnog kršenja pravila.
Ovo se ne primenjuje kada su se relevantna pravila naknadno promenila, jer bi retrospektivna primena različitih pravila generalno bila nepravedna. Umesto toga, ovaj princip se odnosi na situacije u kojima su ista pravila bila na snazi u relevantnom vremenu i nastavljaju da se primenjuju, a naknadni dobici su ostvareni pod okolnostima koje su i dalje obuhvaćene tim pravilima.
Detaljnija provera ili istraga vašeg načina igre je takođe mogla biti sprovedena tokom dužeg vremenskog perioda u pozadini. Ovo bi potencijalno moglo da objasni zašto vas je tim kazina kontaktirao u vezi sa mogućom upotrebom određene strategije.
Uz to rečeno, još uvek sam u procesu razmatranja svih okolnosti.
Pored toga, koliko razumem, u vaš slučaj ste uključili advokata i da im je kazino izgleda pružio detaljne informacije u vezi sa tim pitanjem već u maju 2026. Možete li, molim vas, pojasniti da li je vaš slučaj nekako formalno odlučen, i ako jeste, kakav je bio ishod?
Dear 2UP Casino,
Thank you for providing the additional information and evidence. I have responded back with some additional enquiries as there still remain certain points I need to be clarified.
Dear aleks86,
Thank you for your responses. I acknowledge that your latest winnings might have been gained without bonus involvement, however, as is often the case during an more throughout investigation, additional information or evidence regarding potential rule violations may come to light during the review process. Therefore, the fact that you had not recently been playing with bonuses does not necessarily mean that your gameplay was no longer subject to the casino’s applicable rules, nor does it prevent the casino from reviewing your previous activity.
It is also relatively standard in the industry that, if it is discovered that winnings were previously obtained in breach of applicable bonus or gameplay restrictions but were already paid out, the casino may review subsequent gameplay and, where the applicable terms and circumstances justify it, deduct or void subsequent winnings as a consequence of the original rule violation.
This does not apply where the relevant rules have subsequently changed, as applying different rules retrospectively would generally be unfair. Rather, this principle pertains to situations where the same rules were in effect at the relevant time and continue to apply, and the subsequent winnings were obtained under circumstances still covered by those rules.
A more thorough verification or investigation of your gameplay may also have been conducted over a longer period of time in the background. This could potentially explain why the casino team contacted you regarding the possible use of a particular strategy.
That being said am I still in process to reviewing all the circumstances.
Additionally, I understand that you involved a lawyer in your case and that the casino appears to have provided them with detailed information regarding the matter already in May 2026. Could you please clarify whether your case was somehow formally decided, and if so, what the outcome was?
Automatski prevedeno: