Pojašnjenje informacija o nalogu
Kada sam kreirao svoj nalog na Casino Guru, Japan nije bio dostupan na listi zemalja.
Stoga sam izabrao Kanadu kako bih nastavio sa registracijom.
Međutim, ja sam zapravo japanski stanovnik koji se nalazi u Japanu.
Ovaj izbor je napravljen isključivo zbog sistemskih ograničenja i nije imao nameru da pogrešno predstavi moj identitet.
⸻
Detalji žalbe
Doživeo sam značajan dobitak igrajući na 2UP kazinu, prvobitno dostigavši približno 180.000 jena.
Nakon toga, nastavio sam da igram normalno koristeći svoj saldo i po sopstvenom nahođenju. Tokom ovog procesa, sećam se da je moj saldo dostigao preko 300.000 jena.
Nakon što sam dostigao ovaj iznos, prestao sam da igram sa namerom da podignem svoja sredstva. Međutim, kada sam pokrenuo proces podizanja, prvi put sam otkrio da je iznos koji se može podići bio samo približno 30.000 jena.
Ova značajna razlika nije unapred saopštena ili objašnjena, i nisam bio svestan da je bilo kakvo prilagođavanje primenjeno tokom ili neposredno nakon moje igre.
Bez obzira na moje sećanje na tačan maksimalni saldo, ključno pitanje nije sam precizan iznos, već nedostatak transparentnosti oko korekcije stanja i odsustvo proverljivih evidencija koje objašnjavaju kako je konačno stanje utvrđeno.
Ovo izaziva ozbiljnu zabrinutost u vezi sa transparentnošću i integritetom sistema za upravljanje bilansom u kazinu.
⸻
Ključni problem: Nedostatak proverljivih zapisa
Kazino nije pružio nikakvo konkretno, objašnjenje zasnovano na podacima, potkrepljeno proverljivim zapisima.
Konkretno, zatražio sam sledeće:
• Kompletni evidencije transakcija
• Kompletna istorija klađenja (Moje opklade)
• Detaljna istorija stanja
• Svi zapisi o korekciji stanja sa vremenskim oznakama
• Tačna osnova za izračunavanje koja je korišćena
Ovi zapisi su neophodni za proveru i legitimnosti postignutog stanja i validnosti bilo kakvog naknadnog prilagođavanja.
⸻
Nedosledna i kontradiktorna objašnjenja
Objašnjenja koja je dao kazino bila su nedosledna i menjala su se više puta.
U jednom trenutku, kazino je eksplicitno priznao da je deo mog stanja bio:
• pogrešno označeno
• greškom konfiskovan
• primenjeno greškom
Dalje su naveli da je stanje ponovo izračunato na osnovu ispravnih uslova promocije i evidencije klađenja.
Međutim, nikada nisu dostavljeni proverljivi evidencioni zapisi, detalji proračuna ili prateći podaci koji bi potkrepili ovu tvrdnju.
Kazino je priznao pogrešnu konfiskaciju i tvrdio da je ponovo izračunao stanje, ali odbija da pruži bilo kakve evidencije ili osnovu za izračunavanje koja bi potkrepila tu tvrdnju.
⸻
Neobjašnjiv zapis o prilagođavanju
U mojoj istoriji transakcija postoji poseban zapis:
„Prilagođavanje – Odbitak za prekoračenje uslova za klađenje"
Iznos: 186.882,73 jena
Međutim:
• Nisam primio/la niti aktivirao/la nikakav bonus
• Već sam ispunio zahtev za klađenje x1
• Nije dato objašnjenje o tome koji je zahtev prekoračen
Uprkos eksplicitnom zahtevu za pojašnjenje, kazino nije pružio:
• koje su opklade korišćene
• kako je zahtev izračunat
• kako je utvrđen iznos odbitka
Zbog toga je nemoguće proveriti legitimnost prilagođavanja.
⸻
Nedostavljanje evidencije
Više puta sam kontaktirao kazino i podneo formalne zahteve za otkrivanje informacija.
Uprkos tome što je obezbeđeno dovoljno vremena i izdato konačno obaveštenje sa jasnim rokom, nisu dostavljeni nikakvi evidencije, zapisi ili objašnjenja zasnovana na podacima.
Ovaj nedostatak odgovora i transparentnosti pokreće ozbiljnu zabrinutost u vezi sa tim da li je prilagođavanje uopšte sprovedeno na osnovu proverljivih podataka.
⸻
Pozicija
Ova žalba nije zasnovana na pretpostavkama ili emocijama.
To je zahtev za verifikaciju na osnovu zapisa koji bi trebalo da postoje u sistemu kazina.
Dok se ne dostavi potpuna i proverljiva dokumentacija, smatram ovo pitanje nerešenim.
⸻
Zahtevana rezolucija
Zvanično zahtevam da kazino dostavi:
• Kompletni evidencija transakcija
• Kompletna evidencija klađenja (Moje opklade)
• Detaljna istorija stanja
• Svi zapisi vezani za podešavanje
• Tačan metod izračunavanja koji je korišćen
• Primenjeni specifični uslovi i odredbe
⸻
Zaključak
Ako se takvi zapisi ne mogu obezbediti, to pokreće ozbiljnu zabrinutost u vezi sa integritetom, tačnošću i transparentnošću sistema i poslovanja kazina.
Account Information Clarification
When I created my account on Casino Guru, Japan was not available in the country selection list.
Therefore, I selected Canada in order to proceed with registration.
However, I am actually a Japanese resident located in Japan.
This selection was made solely due to system limitations and was not intended to misrepresent my identity.
⸻
Complaint Details
I experienced a significant win while playing on 2UP Casino, initially reaching approximately JPY 180,000.
After that, I continued playing normally using my own balance and at my own discretion. During this process, I recall that my balance reached over JPY 300,000.
After reaching this amount, I stopped playing with the intention of withdrawing my funds. However, when I initiated the withdrawal process, I discovered for the first time that the withdrawable amount was only approximately JPY 30,000.
This significant discrepancy was not communicated or explained in advance, and I was not aware that any adjustment had been applied during or immediately after my gameplay.
Regardless of my recollection of the exact peak balance, the key issue is not the precise amount itself, but the lack of transparency surrounding the balance adjustment and the absence of verifiable records explaining how the final balance was determined.
This raises serious concerns regarding the transparency and integrity of the casino’s balance management system.
⸻
Core Issue: Lack of Verifiable Records
The casino has failed to provide any concrete, data-based explanation supported by verifiable records.
Specifically, I have requested the following:
• Complete transaction logs
• Full betting history (My Bets)
• Detailed balance history
• All balance adjustment records with timestamps
• The exact calculation basis used
These records are essential to verify both the legitimacy of the balance I reached and the validity of any subsequent adjustment.
⸻
Inconsistent and Contradictory Explanations
The explanations provided by the casino have been inconsistent and have changed multiple times.
At one point, the casino explicitly acknowledged that part of my balance had been:
• incorrectly flagged
• mistakenly confiscated
• applied in error
They further stated that the balance had been recalculated based on correct promotion terms and betting records.
However, no verifiable logs, calculation details, or supporting data have ever been provided to substantiate this claim.
The casino acknowledged a mistaken confiscation and claimed to have recalculated the balance, yet refuses to provide any logs or calculation basis to support that claim.
⸻
Unexplained Adjustment Record
In my transaction history, there is a specific entry:
"Adjustment – Wagering Requirement Exceeded Deduction"
Amount: JPY 186,882.73
However:
• I did not receive or activate any bonus
• I had already completed the x1 wagering requirement
• No explanation has been provided regarding what requirement was exceeded
Despite explicitly requesting clarification, the casino has not provided:
• which bets were used
• how the requirement was calculated
• how the deduction amount was determined
This makes it impossible to verify the legitimacy of the adjustment.
⸻
Failure to Provide Records
I have contacted the casino multiple times and submitted formal requests for disclosure.
Despite providing sufficient time and issuing a final notice with a clear deadline, no logs, records, or data-based explanations have been provided.
This lack of response and transparency raises serious concerns regarding whether the adjustment was conducted based on verifiable data at all.
⸻
Position
This complaint is not based on assumptions or emotion.
It is a request for verification based on records that should exist within the casino’s system.
Until complete and verifiable documentation is provided, I consider this matter unresolved.
⸻
Requested Resolution
I formally request that the casino provide:
• Full transaction logs
• Complete betting records (My Bets)
• Detailed balance history
• All adjustment-related records
• The exact calculation method used
• The specific Terms and Conditions applied
⸻
Conclusion
If such records cannot be provided, it raises serious concerns about the integrity, accuracy, and transparency of the casino’s systems and operations.
Automatski prevedeno: