Rezime žalbe
Osporavam konfiskaciju mog dobitka (1.351 USDT) od strane Bitcasino.io, nakon što je nalog označen kao navodno „višestruko korišćenje naloga" prema njihovim Uslovima 8.4 i 8.6.
Hronologija događaja
Uplatio sam 300 evra i igrao na svom nalogu (korisničko ime: Quokka2002).
Moj račun je naknadno pobedio i zatražio sam povlačenje 1.351 USDT.
Dobio sam poruku od „Tima za bezbednost i osiguranje igrača" kompanije Bitcasino.io u kojoj se navodi da su mi bonusi i promocije onemogućeni jer su njihovi bezbednosni sistemi označili moj nalog kao višestruki nalog, navodno kršeći Uslove 8.4 i 8.6.
U vreme ove prijave, još uvek nisam završio verifikaciju identiteta (KYC) na svom nalogu. Nije postojala nikakva lična dokumentacija u dosijeu koja bi mogla biti korišćena za upoređivanje ili povezivanje mog naloga sa bilo kojim drugim nalogom, članom porodice, domaćinstvom ili deljenim okruženjem.
Zamoljen sam da završim verifikaciju identiteta preko stranice mog naloga, a zatim da kontaktiram podršku.
Završio/la sam traženu verifikaciju identiteta.
Poslao/la sam formalni pisani prigovor kompaniji Bitcasino.io, zahtevajući: Konkretne dokaze/podatke koji su doveli do zastavice za višestruke naloge
Potvrda o tome koji drugi nalog(i), ako ih ima, navodno su povezani sa mojim
Status mog čekajućeg povlačenja (1.351 USDT)
Vremenski okvir za rešavanje
Identitet/korisničko ime navodno povezanog(ih) naloga
Tačna formulacija odredbi 8.4 i 8.6 i objašnjenje kako je moja aktivnost na nalogu prekršila te odredbe
Bitcasino.io je odgovorio navodeći da moja verifikacija „nije bila uspešna", da moj nalog neće ispunjavati uslove za bonuse/promocije i citirao je Uslove 8.4 i 8.6 u celosti. Nisu odgovorili ni na jedno od mojih šest konkretnih pitanja — nisu dostavljeni dokazi, nije identifikovan povezani nalog, a status mog povlačenja od 1.351 USDT nije eksplicitno potvrđen.
Izjavili su da je ovo njihova „konačna odluka" i da neće biti dalje komunikacije.
Zašto smatram da je ova odluka nepravedna
Ne upravljam sa više naloga.
U vreme prijave nije postojala KYC dokumentacija na mom nalogu, što znači da operater nije imao dostupne lične podatke (identifikacioni dokument, dokaz o adresi itd.) koje bi mogao da uporedi sa bilo kojim drugim nalogom.
Uprkos zahtevu za konkretne dokaze o navodnoj vezi, operater ih nije pružio — samo je ponovio svoje opšte uslove.
Operator je odbio svaki dalji angažman ili pravo na odgovor, uprkos aktivnom stanju i legitimnom, nerešenom zahtevu za povlačenje sredstava.
Odredbe 8.4 i 8.6 su široko formulisane (pokrivaju zajednička domaćinstva, IP adrese i zajednička okruženja kao što su radna mesta ili biblioteke), što operateru daje široku diskreciju. Zahtevam pravedan, na dokazima zasnovan pregled primene ovih odredbi u mom konkretnom slučaju, a ne samo citiranje samih odredbi.
Šta zahtevam
Transparentan, na dokazima zasnovan pregled odluke o višestrukom računovodstvu.
Vraćanje mojih legitimno povučenih dobitaka (1.351 USDT), ili jasno, dokazano opravdanje za njihovu konfiskaciju.
Pisana potvrda trenutnog statusa mog povlačenja (obrađeno, na čekanju ili poništeno).
Srdačan pozdrav,
Šantel K.
Summary of complaint
I am disputing the confiscation of my winnings (1,351 USDT) by Bitcasino.io, following an account flag for alleged "multi-accounting" under their Terms 8.4 and 8.6.
Timeline of events
I deposited €300 and played on my account (username: Quokka2002).
My account subsequently won and I requested a withdrawal of 1,351 USDT.
I received a message from Bitcasino.io's "Player Safety and Assurance Team" stating that my bonuses and promotions had been disabled because their security systems had flagged my account for multi-accounting, allegedly in breach of Terms 8.4 and 8.6.
At the time of this flag, I had not yet completed identity verification (KYC) on my account. No personal documentation existed on file that could have been used to compare or link my account to any other account, family member, household, or shared environment.
I was asked to complete identity verification via my account page and then follow up with support.
I completed the requested identity verification.
I sent a formal written dispute to Bitcasino.io, requesting: The specific evidence/data points that led to the multi-accounting flag
Confirmation of which other account(s), if any, are alleged to be linked to mine
The status of my pending withdrawal (1,351 USDT)
A timeline for resolution
The identity/username of the allegedly linked account(s)
The exact wording of Terms 8.4 and 8.6 and an explanation of how my account activity breached them
Bitcasino.io replied stating that my verification was "not successful," that my account would not be eligible for bonuses/promotions, and quoted Terms 8.4 and 8.6 in full. They did not answer any of my six specific questions — no evidence was provided, no linked account was identified, and the status of my 1,351 USDT withdrawal was not explicitly confirmed.
They stated this was their "final decision" and that no further communication would be provided.
Why I believe this decision is unfair
I do not operate multiple accounts.
No KYC documentation existed on my account at the time of the flag, meaning there was no personal data (ID, proof of address, etc.) available for the operator to have compared against any other account.
Despite requesting specific evidence of the alleged link, the operator provided none — only a restatement of their general terms.
The operator refused any further engagement or right of reply, despite an active balance and a legitimate, unresolved withdrawal request.
Terms 8.4 and 8.6 are broadly worded (covering shared households, IP addresses, and shared environments such as workplaces or libraries), which gives the operator wide discretion. I am requesting a fair, evidence-based review of how these terms were applied to my specific case, not merely a citation of the terms themselves.
What I am requesting
A transparent, evidence-based review of the multi-accounting determination.
Release of my legitimately withdrawn winnings (1,351 USDT), or a clear, evidenced justification for their confiscation.
Written confirmation of the current status of my withdrawal (processed, on hold, or reversed).
Kind regards,
Chantell K.
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: