Podnosim novu i posebnu žalbu u vezi sa Blindluck-om i oduzimanjem 960,19 evra sa mog računa.
Ovo nije isti spor kao moja prethodna žalba na Blindluck.
U avgustu 2026. godine sam uplatio 40 evra. Pre tog depozita, već sam imao približno 7,57 evra na svom računu, što je bio pravi novac, a ne bonus sredstva. Posebno sam proverio status svog bonusa: nisam imao aktivan bonus i stanje bonusa je bilo 0,00 evra.
Zatim sam igrao Pragmatic Play-ovu Sweet Bonanza 1000 i osvojio približno 2.131,46 evra. Imam snimke ekrana koji prikazuju dobitak, stanje na mom računu, stanje bonusa od 0,00 evra, bez aktivnog bonusa i moj KYC-verifikovani status.
Nakon pobede, Blindluck je prikazao približno 2.181,68 evra kao stanje pravog novca. Zatim sam zatražio isplatu od 1.000 evra.
Blindluck je kasnije otkazao moju isplatu, uklonio 960,19 evra sa mog stanja i vratio samo moj poslednji depozit od 40 evra.
Kao opravdanje, Blindluck se generalno pozvao na klauzulu 5.9.5 svojih Uslova i odredbi.
Međutim, ova klauzula sadrži nekoliko potpuno različitih navoda:
Manipulacija VPN/IP-om;
falsifikovani dokumenti za verifikaciju;
sumnja na zloupotrebu bonusa;
prevara, dosluh, nezakonite aktivnosti ili igranje uz pomoć softvera.
Slepa laka mi nikada nije rekla koja od ovih optužbi se zapravo odnosi na mene.
Više puta sam ih tražio da navedu tačan podčlan, konkretno ponašanje koje sam navodno počinio i dokaze koji potkrepljuju njihovu odluku. Oni nisu pružili ove informacije.
Radi jasnoće:
Nisam koristio VPN. Igrao sam normalno na svom mobilnom telefonu koristeći uobičajene kućne i poslovne internet veze.
Nisam dostavio falsifikovana dokumenta. Moj nalog je bio KYC verifikovan. Kada je Blindluck kasnije zatražio selfi sa vozačkom dozvolom, dostavio sam ga normalno.
Nisam imao aktivan bonus tokom relevantne pobede. Moji snimci ekrana jasno pokazuju stanje bonusa od 0,00 € i da nema aktivnog bonusa.
Nisam koristio softver, automatizaciju, dosluh ili bilo koju zabranjenu metodu. Jednostavno sam igrao Sweet Bonanza normalno.
Blindlak je sada pismeno izjavio da je njegova odluka „konačna".
Takođe su izjavili da će dostaviti relevantne detalje i prateće dokaze organu za licenciranje i „službi za alternativno rešavanje sporova (ARS)".
Uprkos tome, Blindlak i dalje odbija da mi pruži navodne dokaze.
Takođe sam više puta tražio od kompanije Blindluck da identifikuje dobavljača alternativnog rešavanja sporova na koga se pozivaju. Uprkos nekoliko zahteva, nisu dali ime ili kontakt podatke svog imenovanog dobavljača alternativnog rešavanja sporova.
Stoga mi je ostala konačna odluka o konfiskaciji, a da još uvek ne znam:
koje konkretno kršenje sam navodno počinio;
koji je podčlan klauzule 5.9.5 primenjen;
koji dokazi navodno dokazuju tvrdnju;
ili kojoj organizaciji za alternativno rešavanje sporova mogu da se obratim da bih osporio njihovu odluku.
Imam obimne dokaze, uključujući snimke ekrana dobitka na Sweet Bonanza, stanje bonusa od 0,00 €, odsustvo aktivnog bonusa, stanje na računu, istoriju transakcija, moje isplate od 1.000 €, KYC status, imejlove iz kazina, imejl o konfiskaciji i konačni odgovor Blindluck-a.
Takođe sam podneo/la zvanični Zahtev za pristup podacima, tražeći relevantne zapise o nalogu, igri, IP adresi/uređaju, KYC-u, riziku/prevari i istrazi. Blindluck je potvrdio/la da se ovaj zahtev obrađuje.
Prethodno sam imao još jedan spor sa Blindluck-om koji je rešavao Casino Guru. Taj slučaj je zatvoren kao „Nerešen – politika bez reakcije" nakon što Blindluck nije sarađivao:
https://casino.guru/complaints/blind-luck-casino-plaier-s-vithdraval-has-been-confiscated
Ova nova tužba se odnosi na posebnu konfiskaciju od 960,19 evra.
S poštovanjem molim Casino Guru da zahteva od Blindluck-a da obezbedi:
tačno onaj podčlan 5.9.5 koji je navodno prekršen;
konkretno ponašanje za koje me optužuju;
dokazi koji potkrepljuju tu tvrdnju;
zapisi o nalogu/igri/IP adresi/KYC-u/bonusima na koje se oslanja;
i identitet njihovog imenovanog pružaoca usluga alternativnog rešavanja sporova.
Ako Blindluck ne može da potkrepi svoju tvrdnju konkretnim dokazima, zahtevam da mi se vrati i isplati 960,19 evra.
I am submitting a new and separate complaint regarding Blindluck and the confiscation of €960.19 from my account.
This is not the same dispute as my previous Blindluck complaint.
In August 2026, I deposited €40. Before that deposit, I already had approximately €7.57 in my account, which was real money and not bonus funds. I specifically checked my bonus status: I had no active bonus and a €0.00 bonus balance.
I then played Pragmatic Play's Sweet Bonanza 1000 and won approximately €2,131.46. I have screenshots showing the win, my account balance, €0.00 bonus balance, no active bonus, and my KYC-verified status.
After the win, Blindluck displayed approximately €2,181.68 as real-money balance. I then requested a withdrawal of €1,000.
Blindluck later cancelled my withdrawal, removed €960.19 from my balance, and refunded only my last €40 deposit.
As justification, Blindluck referred generally to clause 5.9.5 of its Terms & Conditions.
However, this clause contains several completely different allegations:
VPN/IP manipulation;
forged verification documents;
suspected bonus abuse;
fraud, collusion, unlawful activity or software-assisted play.
Blindluck has never told me which of these allegations actually applies to me.
I have repeatedly asked them to identify the exact subsection, the specific conduct I allegedly committed, and the evidence supporting their decision. They have not provided this information.
For clarity:
I did not use a VPN. I played normally on my own mobile phone using normal home and workplace internet connections.
I did not provide forged documents. My account was KYC verified. When Blindluck later requested a selfie of me holding my driving licence, I provided it normally.
I had no active bonus during the relevant win. My screenshots clearly show €0.00 bonus balance and no active bonus.
I did not use software, automation, collusion or any prohibited method. I simply played Sweet Bonanza normally.
Blindluck has now stated in writing that its decision is "final".
They also stated that they would provide the relevant details and supporting evidence to the licensing authority and "the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) service."
Despite this, Blindluck still refuses to provide me with the alleged evidence.
I have also repeatedly asked Blindluck to identify the ADR provider they refer to. Despite several requests, they have not provided the name or contact details of their appointed ADR provider.
I am therefore left with a final confiscation decision while still not knowing:
what specific violation I allegedly committed;
which subsection of clause 5.9.5 was applied;
what evidence supposedly proves the allegation;
or which ADR organisation I can contact to challenge their decision.
I have extensive evidence, including screenshots of the Sweet Bonanza win, €0.00 bonus balance, no active bonus, account balances, transaction history, my €1,000 withdrawal, KYC status, casino emails, the confiscation email and Blindluck's final response.
I have also submitted a formal Data Subject Access Request requesting relevant account, game, IP/device, KYC, risk/fraud and investigation records. Blindluck confirmed that this request is being processed.
I previously had another dispute with Blindluck which Casino Guru handled. That case was closed as "Unresolved – No Reaction Policy" after Blindluck failed to cooperate:
https://casino.guru/complaints/blind-luck-casino-player-s-withdrawal-has-been-confiscated
This new complaint concerns a separate €960.19 confiscation.
I respectfully ask Casino Guru to require Blindluck to provide:
the exact subsection of 5.9.5 allegedly violated;
the specific conduct they accuse me of;
the evidence supporting that allegation;
the account/game/IP/KYC/bonus records relied upon;
and the identity of their appointed ADR provider.
If Blindluck cannot substantiate its allegation with concrete evidence, I request that the €960.19 be returned and paid to me.
Automatski prevedeno: