Dragi Martine,
Hvala vam na kontinuiranom učešću u ovoj žalbi.
Želeo bih s poštovanjem da razjasnim da se moja žalba ne odnosi isključivo na depozite, isplate ili na to da li sam ostvario neto dobit ili gubitak nakon što je moj nalog pogrešno ponovo otvoren. Verujem da kazino pokušava da suzi obim ove žalbe kako bi izbegao rešavanje pravog problema.
Centralno pitanje je to što je Boho Casino svesno ponovo otvorio nalog koji je bio trajno zatvoren zbog moje zavisnosti od kockanja i zahteva za samoisključenje. Već su priznali da je ponovno otvaranje mog naloga bila greška i da se nikada nije smelo dogoditi.
Činjenica da sam možda podigao više nego što sam uplatio tokom tog određenog perioda ponovnog otvaranja ne briše nastalu štetu, niti uklanja odgovornost kazina prema principima odgovornog kockanja.
Želeo bih da kazino odgovori na sledeća pitanja:
Zašto je istorija transakcija ograničena samo na period koji počinje 29. jula, umesto da uključuje kompletnu istoriju mog naloga od datuma kada je nalog prvobitno otvoren?
Zašto se moji značajni istorijski depoziti i gubici ignorišu, posebno kada su ti gubici bili jedan od razloga zašto sam više puta tražio da mi se račun trajno zatvori?
Zašto kazino nije odgovorio na činjenicu da sam više puta zahtevao zatvaranje naloga zbog zavisnosti od kockanja, a nalog je kasnije ponovo otvoren, što mi je omogućilo da nastavim sa kockanjem?
Ako kazino prizna da je ponovno otvaranje mog naloga bila ozbiljna greška, kako može zaključiti da nije bilo štete samo zbog finansijskog ishoda tokom jednog izolovanog perioda?
Ova žalba se odnosi na zaštitu potrošača, obaveze odgovornog kockanja i neuspeh kazina da zaštiti ranjivog igrača. Pitanje nije da li sam dobio ili izgubio nakon ponovnog otvaranja. Pitanje je u tome što mi nikada više nije trebalo dati pristup kockanju.
Stoga zahtevam da kazino obezbedi:
Moja kompletna istorija transakcija od datuma otvaranja računa do njegovog konačnog zatvaranja, uključujući sve depozite, isplate, bonuse i aktivnosti u igrama.
Kopije svih evidencija o zatvaranju računa, samoisključenju, odgovornom kockanju i ponovnom otvaranju.
Objašnjenje kako je moj nalog ponovo otvoren uprkos mojim prethodnim zahtevima za zatvaranje.
Detalji interne istrage koja je zaključila da je ovo bila „greška".
Potvrda o tome koje su mere sprovedene kako bi se osiguralo da se ovo ne može dogoditi drugim ranjivim igračima.
S obzirom na to da je kazino već priznao da je ponovno otvaranje mog naloga bila greška, smatram da je prerano i nepravedno da proglase da je ovo pitanje rešeno bez potpunog rešavanja posledica tog kršenja.
S poštovanjem molim Casino Guru da nastavi sa istragom ovog pitanja u celosti i da ne ograničava procenu isključivo na depozite i isplate izvršene nakon pogrešnog ponovnog otvaranja.
Takođe zadržavam pravo da potražim dodatne pravne lekove preko nadležnih regulatornih organa ako se ovaj slučaj zatvori bez potpune istrage o kršenju obaveza odgovornog kockanja od strane kazina i gubicima povezanim sa tim propustom.
Dear Martin,
Thank you for your continued involvement in this complaint.
I would like to respectfully clarify that my complaint is not solely about the deposits, withdrawals, or whether I made a net profit or loss after my account was wrongly reopened. I believe the casino is attempting to narrow the scope of this complaint to avoid addressing the real issue.
The central issue is that Boho Casino knowingly reopened an account that had been permanently closed due to my gambling addiction and self-exclusion requests. They have already admitted that reopening my account was an error and should never have happened.
The fact that I may have withdrawn more than I deposited during that specific reopening period does not erase the harm caused, nor does it remove the casino’s responsibility under responsible gambling principles.
I would like the casino to answer the following questions:
Why is the transaction history being limited only to the period beginning 29 July, instead of including my complete account history from the date the account was originally opened?
Why are my substantial historical deposits and losses being ignored, particularly when those losses were one of the reasons I repeatedly requested that my account be permanently closed?
Why has the casino failed to address the fact that I made multiple requests to close my account because of my gambling addiction, yet the account was later reopened, allowing me to continue gambling?
If the casino acknowledges that reopening my account was a serious mistake, how can it conclude that there was no harm simply because of the financial outcome during one isolated period?
This complaint concerns consumer protection, responsible gambling obligations, and the casino’s failure to protect a vulnerable player. The issue is not whether I won or lost after the reopening. The issue is that I should never have been given access to gamble again.
I am therefore requesting that the casino provide:
My complete transaction history from the date the account was first opened until its final closure, including all deposits, withdrawals, bonuses, and gaming activity.
Copies of all account closure, self-exclusion, responsible gambling, and reopening records.
An explanation of how my account was reopened despite my previous closure requests.
Details of the internal investigation that concluded this was an "error."
Confirmation of what measures have been implemented to ensure this cannot happen to other vulnerable players.
Given the casino has already admitted that reopening my account was a mistake, I believe it is premature and unfair for them to declare this matter resolved without fully addressing the consequences of that breach.
I respectfully ask Casino Guru to continue investigating this matter in its entirety and not limit the assessment solely to the deposits and withdrawals made after the erroneous reopening.
I also reserve my right to pursue additional remedies through the appropriate regulatory authorities if this matter is closed without a full investigation into the casino’s breach of its responsible gambling obligations and the losses connected to that failure.
Automatski prevedeno: