Dragi BOHO kazino,
Hvala vam na pojašnjenju i objašnjenju metodologije koja se koristi za izračunavanje povraćaja poreza.
Nakon pregleda istorije transakcija, nisam uveren da je korišćenje perioda koji počinje od 16. marta zapravo povoljniji pristup za igrača.
Dana 17. marta, igrač je uspešno podigao ukupno 35.000 norveških kruna. Uključivanje depozita izvršenih pre ovog značajnog podizanja efikasno nadoknađuje kasnije gubitke dobicima koji su već legitimno podignuti. Iz naše perspektive, ovo stavlja igrača u nepovoljniji položaj, a ne u bolji, jer ga u suštini kažnjava zato što je osvojio i podigao sredstva pre nego što je račun ponovo otvoren.
Ključni problem u ovoj žalbi je to što je igračev nalog ponovo otvoren uprkos njegovom prethodnom zahtevu za ograničenje vezano za kockanje. Kada je nalog ponovo postao dostupan 14. maja, igrač je mogao da nastavi sa kockanjem do 19. maja.
Prema istoriji transakcija, igrač je uplatio 31.842,45 NOK tokom ovog perioda i podigao 5.000 NOK. Stoga se čini prikladnijim proceniti povraćaj novca isključivo na osnovu aktivnosti koja se dogodila nakon ponovnog otvaranja naloga, jer to predstavlja period tokom kojeg mere odgovornog kockanja u kazinu nisu dale rezultate.
Na osnovu ovih brojki, neto gubitak igrača za relevantni period iznosio bi 26.842,45 NOK (31.842,45 NOK u depozitima minus isplata od 5.000 NOK).
Možete li, molimo vas, pregledati ovaj pristup i obavestiti nas da li biste bili spremni da ponovo razmotrite iznos povraćaja na osnovu toga? Verujemo da ova metodologija preciznije odražava direktne posledice ponovnog otvaranja računa i izbegava nadoknađivanje gubitaka povlačenjima koja su se dogodila pre ponovnog otvaranja.
Dear BOHO Casino,
Thank you for your clarification and for explaining the methodology used to calculate the refund.
After reviewing the transaction history, I am not convinced that using the period starting from March 16 is actually the more favorable approach for the player.
On March 17, the player successfully withdrew a total of 35,000 NOK. Including deposits made before this significant withdrawal effectively offsets later losses with winnings that had already been legitimately withdrawn. From our perspective, this places the player in a less favorable position rather than a better one, as it essentially penalizes him for having won and withdrawn funds before the account was reopened.
The core issue in this complaint is that the player's account was reopened despite his previous request for a gambling-related restriction. Once the account became accessible again on May 14, the player was able to continue gambling until May 19.
According to the transaction history, the player deposited 31,842.45 NOK during this period and made a withdrawal of 5,000 NOK. Therefore, it appears more appropriate to assess the refund based solely on the activity that occurred after the account was reopened, as this represents the period during which the casino's responsible gambling measures failed.
Based on these figures, the player's net loss for the relevant period would amount to 26,842.45 NOK (31,842.45 NOK in deposits minus the 5,000 NOK withdrawal).
Could you please review this approach and let us know whether you would be willing to reconsider the refund amount on this basis? We believe this methodology more accurately reflects the direct consequences of the account being reopened and avoids offsetting losses with withdrawals that occurred prior to the reopening.
Automatski prevedeno: