Draga Veronika,
Hvala vam na kontinuiranoj pomoći u vezi sa mojom žalbom.
Želeo bih da vas obavestim o važnim informacijama u vezi sa najnovijim odgovorom kompanije Bwin.
Bvin tvrdi da su mi vratili samo depozite jer sam imao aktivno samoisključenje na drugom nalogu. Takođe navode da su ubrzo nakon što sam podneo dokumenta za verifikaciju, uspeli da povežu sve moje naloge.
Ova izjava izaziva ozbiljnu zabrinutost.
Ako je Bwin već utvrdio da imam drugi nalog pod samoisključenjem nakon pregleda mojih dokumenata za verifikaciju, zašto me nisu odmah obavestili i blokirali moj nalog?
Umesto toga, nakon što su moji dokumenti verifikovani, Bwin mi je ipak dozvolio da:
uplatite depozit,
koristite nalog normalno,
kladiti se,
da li su sve moje opklade prihvaćene i rešene,
akumulirati saldo od približno 1.161,00 €,
pa čak i podneti zahtev za povlačenje celog iznosa.
Tek nakon što sam pobedio i zatražio isplatu, Bwin je otkazao moju isplatu i odlučio da vrati samo moje depozite, dok je zadržao preostalih 641,00 €.
Ovo je deo koji smatram fundamentalno nepravednim.
Ako je Bwin već povezao moje naloge nakon pregleda mojih dokumenata, onda su već bili svesni aktivnog samoisključenja pre nego što sam uplatio depozit i igrao. Ako je to tačno, trebalo je da me odmah spreče da se kockam u skladu sa svojom politikom odgovornog kockanja.
Umesto toga, nastavili su da dozvoljavaju kockarske aktivnosti i samoisključenje su sprovodili tek nakon što sam pobedio.
Verujem da Bwin svu odgovornost prebacuje na mene, dok ignoriše sopstvenu odgovornost da pravilno sprovodi svoje procedure odgovornog kockanja.
Svrha samoisključenja je sprečavanje kockanja. Dozvoljavanje igraču da verifikuje nalog, uplati novac, postavi opklade, prihvati te opklade, reši ih i tek nakon toga proglasi sve dobitke nevažećim je, po mom mišljenju, nespojivo sa svrhom odgovornog kockanja.
S poštovanjem molim Casino Guru da razgovara o ovom konkretnom problemu sa Bwin-om i tražim pojašnjenje sledećih tačaka:
Kog tačno datuma je Bwin povezao moje naloge?
Ako su moji računi već bili povezani nakon što su moji dokumenti pregledani, zašto mi je i dalje bilo dozvoljeno da uplaćujem depozite i kockam se?
Zašto moj nalog nije odmah blokiran nakon što su identifikovali aktivno samoisključenje?
Zašto nisam bio obavešten pre nego što sam uplatio novac da mi nije dozvoljeno da koristim račun?
Zašto je moja isplata prihvaćena, a tek kasnije otkazana nakon što su moji dobici generisani?
Bvin nikada nije odgovorio na ova pitanja. Umesto toga, oni nastavljaju da ponavljaju da su mi vratili depozite i zadržali dobitke, bez objašnjenja zašto su mi dozvolili da nastavim sa kockanjem nakon što tvrde da su već identifikovali problem.
Verujem da je ova tačka ključna za utvrđivanje da li je Bwin postupao pošteno i dosledno u skladu sa svojim obavezama odgovornog kockanja.
Dear Veronika,
Thank you for your continued assistance with my complaint.
I would like to provide you with an important update regarding Bwin's latest response.
Bwin maintains that they refunded only my deposits because I had an active self-exclusion on another account. They also state that shortly after I submitted my verification documents, they were able to link all of my accounts.
This statement raises a serious concern.
If Bwin had already identified that I had another account under self-exclusion after reviewing my verification documents, why did they not immediately inform me and block my account?
Instead, after my documents were verified, Bwin still allowed me to:
make a deposit,
use the account normally,
place bets,
have all of my bets accepted and settled,
accumulate a balance of approximately €1,161.00,
and even submit a withdrawal request for the full balance.
Only after I had won and requested a withdrawal did Bwin cancel my withdrawal and decide to refund only my deposits while withholding the remaining €641.00.
This is the part that I believe is fundamentally unfair.
If Bwin had already linked my accounts after reviewing my documents, then they were already aware of the active self-exclusion before I deposited and played. If that is true, they should have immediately prevented me from gambling in accordance with their own Responsible Gambling policy.
Instead, they continued to allow gambling activity and only enforced the self-exclusion after I had won.
I believe that Bwin is placing the entire responsibility on me while ignoring its own responsibility to enforce its Responsible Gambling procedures correctly.
The purpose of self-exclusion is to prevent gambling from taking place. Allowing a player to verify an account, deposit money, place bets, accept those bets, settle them, and only afterwards declare all winnings invalid is, in my opinion, inconsistent with the purpose of responsible gambling.
I respectfully ask Casino Guru to discuss this specific issue with Bwin and request clarification on the following points:
On what exact date did Bwin link my accounts?
If my accounts had already been linked after my documents were reviewed, why was I still allowed to deposit and gamble?
Why was my account not blocked immediately once they identified the active self-exclusion?
Why was I not informed before I deposited money that I was not permitted to use the account?
Why was my withdrawal accepted and only later cancelled after my winnings had been generated?
These questions have never been answered by Bwin. Instead, they continue to repeat that they refunded my deposits and withheld my winnings, without explaining why they allowed me to continue gambling after they claim they had already identified the issue.
I believe this point is essential to determining whether Bwin acted fairly and consistently with its own Responsible Gambling obligations.
Automatski prevedeno: