Dragi Adame,
Još jednom vam hvala na kontinuiranom angažovanju i što ste podelili stav Kodeksa za fer kockanje Casino Guru-a.
U potpunosti razumemo vašu zabrinutost i važnost održavanja poštenih praksi u celoj industriji. Istovremeno, moramo s poštovanjem ostati iza naše trenutne rezolucije, koja je zasnovana i na našim Uslovima i odredbama i na važećim regulatornim obavezama prema Anžuan licenci.
Kao što je prethodno rečeno, zemlja prebivališta igrača je potvrđena samo tokom procesa povlačenja sredstava, u skladu sa zahtevima kompanije Anjouan za dužnu pažnju kupaca (CDD), koji nalažu verifikaciju identiteta i lokacije prilikom prvog povlačenja sredstava. Kada je igrač dostavio dokaz o adresi kojim se potvrđuje prebivalište u Nemačkoj — ograničenoj jurisdikciji — odmah smo reagovali u skladu sa:
Član 5.1.3: zabrana korišćenja naših Usluga iz zemalja sa ograničenim pristupom;
Klauzula 5.6: navodi da će sve transakcije iz takvih jurisdikcija biti poništene i da će biti vraćen samo iznos depozita.
Kao licencirani operater, zakonski smo obavezni da sprovodimo ova pravila. Igrač je prekršio Uslove i odredbe, i shodno tome, primenili smo odgovarajuću politiku — vraćanje punog depozita od 102,99 USD i poništavanje dobitaka, kako je predviđeno našim pravilima.
Takođe je važno naglasiti da je pre završetka registracije, igrač bio dužan da ručno potvrdi saglasnost sa našim Uslovima i odredbama tako što je označio odgovarajuće polje — što služi kao aktivna saglasnost korisnika. Ova potvrda podrazumeva da je igrač pročitao, razumeo i prihvatio uslove, uključujući ograničenja nadležnosti i posledice njihovog kršenja. Drugim rečima, igrač je bio u potpunosti svestan pravila i potencijalnog ishoda u takvim slučajevima.
Čvrsto verujemo da se u ovom slučaju ne radi o pravičnosti, već o pokušaju profitiranja od svesno učinjenog kršenja pravila. Igrač je mogao da se registruje, uplati depozit i igra iz zemlje u kojoj su dozvoljeni uslovi – što je direktno kršenje naših uslova – i pokrenuo je pitanje tek kada su dobici bili u pitanju. Ovo pokreće ozbiljne sumnje u dobre namere koje stoje iza žalbe.
Štaviše, nuđenje isplata u takvim slučajevima stvorilo bi opasan presedan, potencijalno podstičući druge korisnike da namerno zaobilaze ograničenja očekujući popustljivost ili finansijsku dobit. Ovo ne samo da bi potkopalo integritet naše platforme, već bi i oslabilo poštovanje ugovornih i regulatornih standarda.
Cenimo vaše preporuke u vezi sa preventivnim merama i trenutno razmatramo opcije za pooštravanje ograničenja na nivou registracije. Međutim, verujemo da je naše rešavanje ovog slučaja bilo pravedno, pravno opravdano i u skladu sa obavezama licenciranja i standardima usklađenosti sa industrijom. Igrač nije pretrpeo nikakav finansijski gubitak — ceo depozit je vraćen — a ishod je pratio jasno definisane uslove.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Tim kazina Claps
Dear Adam,
Thank you once again for your continued engagement and for sharing the Casino Guru Fair Gambling Codex position.
We fully understand your concerns and the importance of maintaining fair practices across the industry. At the same time, we must respectfully stand by our current resolution, which is grounded in both our Terms and Conditions and the applicable regulatory obligations under the Anjouan license.
As previously stated, the player’s country of residence was only confirmed during the withdrawal process, in line with Anjouan’s Customer Due Diligence (CDD) requirements, which mandate identity and location verification at the first withdrawal. Once the player submitted proof of address confirming residence in Germany — a restricted jurisdiction — we acted immediately in accordance with:
Clause 5.1.3: prohibiting use of our Services from restricted countries;
Clause 5.6: stating that all transactions from such jurisdictions will be nullified and only the deposit amount returned.
As a licensed operator, we are legally obligated to enforce these rules. The player violated the Terms and Conditions, and accordingly, we applied the relevant policy — returning the full deposit of 102.99 USD and voiding the winnings, as stipulated in our rules.
It’s also important to emphasize that before completing registration, the player was required to manually confirm agreement with our Terms and Conditions by checking the appropriate box — which serves as active user consent. This confirmation implies that the player has read, understood, and accepted the terms, including jurisdictional restrictions and the consequences of violating them. In other words, the player was fully aware of the rules and the potential outcome in such cases.
We strongly believe that this case is not about fairness, but rather about attempting to profit from a knowingly made violation. The player was able to register, deposit, and play from a restricted country — in direct breach of our terms — and only raised the issue once winnings were involved. This raises serious doubts about the good faith intentions behind the complaint.
Moreover, offering payouts in such cases would create a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging other users to deliberately bypass restrictions with the expectation of leniency or financial gain. This would not only undermine the integrity of our platform, but also weaken adherence to both contractual and regulatory standards.
We appreciate your recommendations regarding preventive measures and are currently reviewing options to strengthen registration-level restrictions. However, we believe our handling of this case was fair, legally justified, and aligned with both licensing obligations and industry compliance standards. The player did not suffer any financial loss — the full deposit was returned — and the outcome followed clearly defined terms.
Kind regards,
Claps Casino Team
Automatski prevedeno: