NaslovnaPritužbeCristal Poker Casino - Dobici igrača su konfiskovani.
Cristal Poker Casino - Dobici igrača su konfiskovani.
Zatvoren
Naša presuda
Neopravdana žalba
Iznos:
1.749 €
Cristal Poker Casino
Index sigurnosti:Visok
Rezime slučaja
Prevod
The player from Latvia had deposited 200 EUR and received a 100 EUR bonus with no wagering requirements. After winning 2227.60 EUR while using only her deposited funds, her withdrawal of 1000 EUR was reduced to 500 EUR due to a maximum withdrawal cap. She contended that this application of the bonus terms was incorrect, as her winnings were generated before using any bonus funds. The casino clarified that the withdrawal cap applied from the moment the bonus was credited, regardless of whether the bonus funds were used in gameplay, and any amount above five times the bonus was forfeited according to their terms. The account closure was due to a chargeback initiated by the player and was unrelated to the withdrawal cap. We found that the casino applied the terms as agreed, and the complaint was closed as unjustified.
Igračica iz Letonije je uplatila 200 evra i dobila bonus od 100 evra bez zahteva za klađenje. Nakon što je osvojila 2227,60 evra koristeći samo svoja uplaćena sredstva, njena isplata od 1000 evra je smanjena na 500 evra zbog maksimalnog ograničenja isplate. Ona je tvrdila da je ova primena uslova bonusa bila netačna, jer su njeni dobici generisani pre korišćenja bilo kakvih bonus sredstava. Kazino je pojasnio da se ograničenje isplate primenjuje od trenutka kada je bonus uplaćen, bez obzira na to da li su bonus sredstva korišćena u igri, i da se svaki iznos iznad pet puta većeg od bonusa gubi u skladu sa njihovim uslovima. Zatvaranje naloga je posledica povraćaja sredstava koji je pokrenuo igrač i nije bilo povezano sa ograničenjem isplate. Utvrdili smo da je kazino primenio uslove kako je dogovoreno, a žalba je zatvorena kao neopravdana.
Uplatio sam 200 evra i dobio bonus na depozit od 100 evra.
Bonus je imao zahtev za klađenje od 0x.
Počeo sam da igram i sve moje opklade su napravljene samo sa mojim deponovanim sredstvima (200 evra). Bonus sredstva nisu iskorišćena, što je potvrđeno u istoriji bonusa koja prikazuje:
Ulog: 0
Osvojio sam 2227,60 evra iz okretanja od 4 evra dok sam još uvek igrao sa svojim deponovanim stanjem.
Nakon toga sam zatražio povlačenje 1000 evra.
U tom trenutku sistem je automatski otkazao bonus, što ukazuje da bonus još nije iskorišćen.
Kasnije je kazino ručno smanjio moju isplatu na 500 evra, tvrdeći da je maksimalni iznos isplate 5 puta veći od iznosa bonusa.
Međutim, prema njihovim sopstvenim uslovima bonusa:
Uplaćena sredstva i dobici mogu se povući u bilo kom trenutku.
Pošto su moji dobici generisani pre korišćenja bilo kakvih bonus sredstava, ograničenje povlačenja bonusa ne bi trebalo da se primenjuje.
Kazino je konfiskovao 1749,60 evra sa mog računa.
Verujem da je ovo pogrešna primena uslova bonusa jer su dobici generisani pravim novcem pre nego što je bonus iskorišćen.
Hello,
I deposited 200 EUR and received a 100 EUR deposit bonus.
The bonus had 0x wagering requirement.
I started playing and all my bets were made only with my deposited funds (200 EUR). The bonus funds were not used, which is confirmed in the bonus history showing:
Wager: 0
I won 2227.60 EUR from a 4 EUR spin while still playing with my deposited balance.
After that I requested a withdrawal of 1000 EUR.
At that moment the system automatically cancelled the bonus, which indicates that the bonus had not yet been used.
Later the casino manually reduced my withdrawal to 500 EUR, claiming that the maximum withdrawal is 5× the bonus amount.
However, according to their own bonus terms:
"The deposited funds and winnings can be withdrawn at any time."
Since my winnings were generated before using any bonus funds, the bonus withdrawal cap should not apply.
The casino confiscated 1749.60 EUR from my balance.
I believe this is an incorrect application of the bonus terms because the winnings were generated with real money funds before the bonus was used.
Casino Guru nikada neće tražiti uplate ili pristup Vašem nalogu da bi se kompletirala KYC procedura. Ukoliko neko tvrdi da je iz našeg tima i traži nešto slično, nemojte deliti svoje lične informacije.
Mi isključivo kontaktiramo igrače kroz oficijalni kanal za prigovore ili putem @casino.guru e-mail adrese. Uvek proverite domen pošiljaoca i proverite email adresu tako što ćete kliknuti na avatar koji se vidi u okviru kanala za prigovore.
Ako Vam nešto izgleda sumnjivo, kontaktirajte nas direktno.
Ponašajte se odgovorno.
Important notice:
Casino Guru will never ask for payments or access to your accounts to complete KYC. If someone claims to be from Casino Guru and does that, do not share any information.
We only contact players through this official complaint thread or via @casino.guru e-mail addresses. Always check the sender’s domain and verify your complaint resolver’s e-mail address by clicking on their avatar visible inside the official complaint thread.
If anything seems suspicious, contact us directly.
Hvala vam puno što ste podneli žalbu. Žao mi je zbog vašeg problema. Proverio sam uslove i odredbe bonusa i pronašao sam ovo:
b) Bonusi koji dolaze sa zahtevom za depozit (klauzula 10.2, 10.3; Sportski bonusi i bonusi za kazino uživo) imaju ograničenje na isplatu od 5 puta većeg iznosa primljenog bonusa i BEZ klađenja. Bilo koji iznos iznad maksimalnog iznosa isplate se ručno gubi kada igrač dostigne maksimalni iznos isplate ili kada igrač zahteva isplatu.
Nažalost, trenutno ne mogu mnogo da učinim da bih podržao vaš slučaj, posebno kada kazino deli sve relevantne informacije na veb stranici. Kazina pokušavaju da dizajniraju svoje bonuse tako da budu što atraktivniji, a postavljanje maksimalnog limita za isplatu bonus dobitaka je veoma uobičajeno. Molim vas, slobodno me obavestite ako postoji još nešto sa čim bih vam mogao pomoći, u suprotnom ću biti primoran da zatvorim ovu žalbu.
Unapred vam se mnogo zahvaljujem na razumevanju.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Atila
Dear vienalga,
Thank you very much for submitting your complaint. I’m sorry to hear about your problem. I checked the Bonus T&Cs and I found this:
b)Bonuses that comes with a deposit requirement (clause 10.2,10.3; Sports Bonuses and Live Casino Bonuses) have limits on withdrawal of 5 times Bonus amount received, and are wager FREE. Any balance above maximum withdrawal amount is forfeited manually once player reach maximum withdrawal amount or when player requests withdrawal.
Sadly, there is not much I can do to support your case at this time, especially when the casino shares all the relevant information on the website. Casinos try to design their bonuses to be as attractive as possible, and setting a maximum cash out limit for bonus winnings is very common. Please, do not hesitate to let me know if there is anything else I could help you with, otherwise, I will be forced to close this complaint.
Thank you very much in advance for your understanding.
Međutim, verujem da moj slučaj zahteva dublji pregled jer situacija nije tipičan scenario sa „ograničenjem bonus dobitaka".
Postoji nekoliko važnih činjenica koje nisu uzete u obzir:
1. Bonus od 100 evra nikada nije korišćen u igri
Sam kazino je u svom imejlu potvrdio da igra koju sam igrao (Play'n GO slot Shimmering Woods) ne dozvoljava igranje sa bonus sredstvima.
Tokom moje sesije igranja, prikazani iznos za igru bio je samo moj pravi novčani iznos od 200 evra, što je bio moj depozit.
Bonus od 100 evra je ostao neaktivan i nije korišćen ni u jednoj opkladi.
To znači da su svi dobici generisani isključivo iz mog stvarnog novčanog stanja, a ne iz bonus sredstava.
Sistem nikada nije dodao bonus sredstva na stanje u igri
Na početku igre moj saldo je bio 200 evra, a ne 300 evra.
Da je bonus bio aktivan tokom igre, sistem bi prikazao kombinovani saldo koji uključuje bonus.
To se nije dogodilo.
Stoga sam sistem potvrđuje da su za klađenje korišćena samo sredstva pravog novca.
2. Kazino je uveo ograničenje koje nije navedeno u njihovim Uslovima.
Kazino tvrdi da Play'n GO igre ne dozvoljavaju bonus igranje.
Međutim, ovo ograničenje nije nigde navedeno u njihovim Uslovima i odredbama bonusa.
To znači da igrač nije mogao razumno znati da se bonus ne može koristiti kod ovog provajdera.
3. Ponašanje prilikom povlačenja dokazuje da su dobici bili stvarni.
Kada sam zatražio isplatu od 1000 evra, moj saldo je shodno tome smanjen, ali sistem nije prvo uklonio bonus saldo od 100 evra, što se obično dešava kada su u pitanju bonus sredstva.
U trenutku povlačenja, moj račun je sadržao samo pravi novac, što još jednom potvrđuje da su dobici od igre generisani iz stvarnih sredstava.
Primer iz iste grupe kazina
Takođe sam testirao isti slot (Shimmering Woods) u njihovom sestrinskom kazinu Hercules Casino, koji koristi istu strukturu bonusa.
U tom slučaju, bonus sredstva su odmah dodata na stanje i jasno prikazana kao bonus stanje.
Ovo pokazuje da je normalno ponašanje njihovog sistema da jasno odvaja i prikazuje bonus sredstva tokom igranja.
U mom slučaju se to nije dogodilo.
Imam snimke ekrana ovoga i mogu ih dostaviti na zahtev.
Zaključak:
1. Bonus sredstva nikada nisu korišćena u igri i ostala su neaktivna zbog ograničenja igre.
2. Svi dobici su generisani isključivo igranjem za pravi novac.
Iz tog razloga, primena ograničenja bonus dobitaka na dobitke od pravog novca deluje netačno i nije u skladu sa načinom na koji se sistem zapravo ponašao tokom igre.
Ljubazno molim da se slučaj ponovo razmotri uzimajući u obzir ove činjenice.
Dokumentovao sam svoju istoriju igranja i snimke ekrana balansa i mogu ih dostaviti ako je potrebno.
Hvala vam što ste još jednom sagledali situaciju.
Hello Attila,
Thank you for reviewing the bonus terms.
However, I believe my case requires a deeper review because the situation is not a typical "bonus winnings capped" scenario.
There are several important facts that were not considered:
1.The €100 bonus was never used in gameplay
The casino itself confirmed in their email that the game I played (Play’n GO slot Shimmering Woods) does not allow gameplay with bonus funds.
During my gameplay session, the playable balance displayed was only my real money balance of €200, which was my deposit.
The €100 bonus remained inactive and was not used in any bets.
This means that all winnings were generated exclusively from my real money balance, not from bonus funds.
The system never added the bonus funds to the gameplay balance
At the start of gameplay my balance was €200, not €300.
If the bonus had been active in gameplay, the system would have displayed a combined balance including the bonus.
This did not happen.
Therefore the system itself confirms that only real money funds were used for betting.
2.The casino introduced a restriction that is not written in their Terms.
The casino claims that Play’n GO games do not allow bonus gameplay.
However, this restriction is not stated anywhere in their Bonus Terms and Conditions.
This means that the player could not reasonably know that the bonus could not be used with this provider.
3.Withdrawal behaviour proves the winnings were real balance.
When I requested a withdrawal of €1000, my balance was reduced accordingly but the system did not remove the €100 bonus balance first, which is what normally happens when bonus funds are involved.
At the time of withdrawal my account contained real cash balance only, confirming again that the gameplay winnings were generated from real funds.
An Example from the same casino group
I also tested the same slot (Shimmering Woods) at their sister casino Hercules Casino, which uses the same bonus structure.
In that case the bonus funds were immediately added to the balance and clearly displayed as bonus balance.
This shows that the normal behaviour of their system is to clearly separate and display bonus funds during gameplay.
In my case this did not happen.
I have screenshots of this and can provide upon request.
Conclusion:
1.The bonus funds were never used in gameplay and remained inactive due to game restrictions.
2.All winnings were generated from real money gameplay only.
For this reason, applying a bonus winnings cap to real money winnings appears incorrect and inconsistent with how the system actually behaved during gameplay.
I kindly ask that the case be reviewed again considering these facts.
I have documented my gameplay history and balance screenshots and can provide them if needed.
Thank you for taking another look at the situation.
Želeo bih da pružim neke dodatne informacije na osnovu najnovijeg odgovora od CristalPoker-a, jer izgleda da objašnjenja kazina sadrže nedoslednosti.
U jednom od svojih odgovora, kazino je potvrdio da igre Play'n GO koje sam igrao ne dozvoljavaju igranje koristeći bonus sredstva i da je tokom moje sesije bonus od 100 evra ostao neaktivan za tu konkretnu igru.
Ovo bi ukazivalo na to da je sesija igranja sprovedena koristeći samo moj stvarni iznos od 200 evra.
Međutim, u svom najnovijem odgovoru, kazino navodi da kada se bonus na depozit uplati na račun, on se smatra aktivnim bez obzira na to da li je korišćen u igri, te se stoga primenjuje pravilo maksimalnog povlačenja.
Čini se da ove dve izjave protivreče jedna drugoj:
• U jednom odgovoru kazino navodi da je bonus ostao neaktivan i da nije korišćen u igri.
• U drugom odgovoru navode da bonus i dalje treba smatrati aktivnim u svrhu primene ograničenja povlačenja.
Pored toga, istorija igranja pokazuje da je početni saldo sesije bio 200 evra, što odgovara iznosu mog depozita. Da je bonus bio aktivan tokom igranja, saldo bi bio 300 evra.
Sve igre koje su igrane tokom sesije bile su Play'n GO naslovi (Leprechaun Goes Egypt, Myth, Easter Eggs, Shimmering Woods), i prema kazinu ove igre ne podržavaju bonus igranje.
Zbog toga, izgleda da su svi dobici generisani isključivo iz igre sa pravim balansom.
Stoga pitam da li bi se ova očigledna nedoslednost u objašnjenju kazina mogla razmotriti kao deo žalbe.
Srdačan pozdrav
[Redigovano]
Hello Attila,
I would like to provide some additional information based on the latest response from CristalPoker, as it appears that the casino’s explanations contain inconsistencies.
In one of their responses, the casino confirmed that the Play’n GO games I played do not allow gameplay using bonus funds and that during my session the €100 bonus remained inactive for that specific game.
This would indicate that the gameplay session was conducted using only my real balance of €200.
However, in their most recent response, the casino states that once a deposit bonus is credited to the account it is considered active regardless of whether it was used in gameplay, and therefore the maximum withdrawal rule applies.
These two statements appear to contradict each other:
• In one response the casino states the bonus remained inactive and was not used in gameplay.
• In another response they state the bonus should still be considered active for the purpose of applying the withdrawal cap.
Additionally, the gameplay history shows that the starting balance of the session was €200, which corresponds to my deposit amount. If the bonus had been active in gameplay, the balance would have been €300.
All games played during the session were Play’n GO titles (Leprechaun Goes Egypt, Myth, Easter Eggs, Shimmering Woods), and according to the casino these games do not support bonus gameplay.
Because of this, it appears that all winnings were generated exclusively from real balance gameplay.
I am therefore asking if this apparent inconsistency in the casino’s explanation could be reviewed as part of the complaint.
Želeo bih da dodam još jednu stvar u vezi sa promocijom CristalPoker-a.
Na njihovoj stranici sa bonusima navodi se da se „uplaćena sredstva i dobici mogu povući u bilo kom trenutku".
Međutim, u mom slučaju, kazino je primenio ograničenje za povlačenje iako je igranje sprovedeno samo sa mojim stvarnim stanjem na računu, jer je bonus ostao neaktivan za odigrane igre Play'n GO.
Zbog toga, promotivne informacije koje se predstavljaju igračima deluju obmanjujuće u poređenju sa načinom na koji se pravila primenjuju u praksi.
Srdačan pozdrav,
[Redigovano]
Hello Attila,
I would like to add one more point regarding the CristalPoker promotion.
On their bonus page it is stated that "the deposited funds and winnings can be withdrawn at any time."
However, in my case the casino applied a withdrawal cap even though the gameplay was conducted only with my real balance, as the bonus remained inactive for the Play’n GO games played.
Because of this, the promotional information presented to players appears misleading compared to how the rules are applied in practice.
Da bih mogao pravilno da procenim problem, da li biste mogli da podelite svoju istoriju igara? Predlažem da zatražite kompletnu istoriju igara direktno od kazina u Eksel formatu. Istorija igara treba da pokriva ceo relevantni period: od trenutka aktivacije bonusa, do oduzimanja dobitaka. Pored toga, da li biste mogli da priložite i snimak ekrana vaše istorije bonusa? Možete me kontaktirati na attila.g@casino.guru .
Unapred hvala na vašem odgovoru.
Dear vienalga,
Thank you for your response.
In order for me to properly asses the issue, could you please share your game history? I suggest requesting the complete game history directly from the casino in Excel format. The game history should cover the whole of the relevant period: from the moment of the activation of the bonus, until the confiscation of the winnings. Additionally, could you please attach a screenshot of your bonus history as well? You can reach me at attila.g@casino.guru.
Želeo bih da razjasnim jednu važnu novost u vezi sa mojim nalogom.
Kazino je zatvorio moj nalog, a ova akcija je preduzeta bez mog zahteva ili pristanka.
Kao rezultat toga, više nemam pristup svom nalogu, što me sprečava da pregledam detalje transakcija, upravljam svojim stanjem ili preduzimam bilo kakve dalje radnje direktno preko platforme.
Ovo izaziva dodatnu zabrinutost, jer se zatvaranje računa dogodilo tokom tekućeg spora u vezi sa depozitima i transakcijama.
Ljubazno molim da se ovaj faktor uzme u obzir prilikom procene slučaja.
Srdačan pozdrav,
[Redigovano]
Dear Attila,
Thank you for taking over my complaint.
I would like to clarify an important update regarding my account.
My account has been closed by the casino, and this action was taken without my request or consent.
As a result, I no longer have access to my account, which prevents me from reviewing transaction details, managing my balance, or taking any further action directly through the platform.
This raises additional concerns, as the account closure happened during an ongoing dispute regarding deposits and transactions.
I kindly ask that this factor is taken into consideration when assessing the case.
Hvala vam na saradnji i što ste nam pružili sve potrebne informacije. Zaista cenim vreme i trud koji ste uložili da sve do sada podelite sa nama.
Vaša žalba će sada preći u sledeću fazu našeg procesa i njome će se baviti vaš dodeljeni rešavač, Mihal ( michal.k@casino.guru ). Ovo je standardni korak u našoj proceduri, jer će Rezolver direktno preuzeti komunikaciju sa kazinom i upravljati vašim slučajem od ove tačke pa nadalje.
Trenutno nije potrebna nikakva akcija od vas. Vaš rešavač će vas kontaktirati putem ove teme ako budu potrebni dodatni detalji. Možete biti sigurni da je vaš slučaj u veoma sposobnim rukama.
Želim vam puno sreće i nadam se da će vaš slučaj uskoro biti rešen na vaše zadovoljstvo.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Atila
Thank you for your cooperation and for providing all the necessary information. I truly appreciate the time and effort you’ve taken to share everything with us so far.
Your complaint will now move to the next stage of our process and be handled by your dedicated Resolver, Michal (michal.k@casino.guru). This is a standard step in our procedure, as the Resolver will take over communication with the casino directly and manage your case from this point onward.
No action is required from you right now. Your Resolver will reach out through this thread if any additional details are needed. You can rest assured that your case is in very capable hands.
I wish you the best of luck and hope your case will be resolved to your satisfaction soon.
Opet je Mihal. Preuzeo sam ovu žalbu. Pregledao sam ovaj slučaj i kontaktiraću kazino kako bih bacio više svetlosti na ovu stvar i video da li mogu nekako da pomognem.
Želeo bih da pozovem Cristal Poker Casino da se pridruži razgovoru.
Dragi Crystal Poker Casino,
Prema objašnjenju igrača, ograničenje njihovih dobitaka ne deluje fer.
Možete li ljubazno dati pojašnjenje u vezi sa tokom događaja i objasniti zašto su dobici igrača bili ograničeni?
Ako postoje faktori koji utiču na ovu situaciju, a koji se ne mogu javno podeliti, slobodno ih podelite direktno sa mnom na michal.k@casino.guru .
Hello vienalga,
It's Michal again. I have taken over this complaint. I have reviewed this case, and I will contact the casino to shed more light on this matter and to see if I can help somehow.
I would like to invite Cristal Poker Casino to join the conversation.
Dear Cristal Poker Casino,
As per the player's explanation, the cap on their winnings doesn't seem to be fair.
Could you kindly provide clarification regarding the course of events and explain why the player's winnings were capped?
If there are any factors influencing this situation that cannot be shared publicly, please feel free to share them directly with me at michal.k@casino.guru.
Hvala vam na poruci i što ste razmotrili ovaj slučaj.
Želeli bismo da razjasnimo situaciju na osnovu naših Uslova i odredbi za bonus i redosleda događaja na igračevom nalogu.
Kao što je već saopšteno igraču putem e-pošte, u skladu sa klauzulom 10.1.3 b) naših Uslova i odredbi za bonus:
Bonusi koji dolaze sa zahtevom za depozit (klauzula 10.2, 10.3; Sportski bonusi i bonusi za kazino uživo) imaju ograničenje za isplatu od 5 puta većeg iznosa primljenog bonusa i ne zahtevaju klađenje. Bilo koji iznos iznad maksimalnog iznosa za isplatu se gubi kada igrač dostigne ovo ograničenje ili podnese zahtev za isplatu.
U skladu sa ovim pravilom, kada se bonus na depozit uplati na račun , on se smatra aktivnim i maksimalni limit za isplatu se primenjuje bez obzira na to da li su sredstva bonusa iskorišćena u igri ili ne .
U ovom konkretnom slučaju:
Igrač je dobio bonus od 100 evra.
Stoga je maksimalni iznos koji se može isplatiti 500€ (5× bonus).
Svaki iznos koji prelazi ovaj iznos je oduzet u skladu sa Uslovima.
Ovaj uslov je jasno naveden u našim Uslovima bonusa i dosledno se primenjuje na sve igrače.
Što se tiče igranja i argumenta o „neiskorišćenom bonusu" :
Iako igrač tvrdi da bonus nije iskorišćen tokom igre, to ne utiče na primenljivost ograničenja za isplatu. Ograničenje je povezano sa aktivacijom bonusa , a ne sa tim da li je stanje bonusa potrošeno tokom igre.
U vezi sa zatvaranjem računa :
Pored toga, želeli bismo da pojasnimo da naš tim nije direktno zatvorio igračev nalog.
Nalog je blokirao naš provajder platforme zbog povraćaja sredstava koji je igrač registrovao unutar mreže provajdera .
Ova radnja je u skladu sa klauzulom 9 (d) i (e) naših Uslova i odredbi:
9 (d) – umešanost ili sumnja na umešanost u prevarne aktivnosti.
9 (e) – pokretanje povraćaja sredstava ili storniranje depozita uplaćenih na račun.
Molimo vas da obratite pažnju:
Obavešteni smo o ovome tek nakon što nas je igrač kontaktirao u vezi sa problemima sa pristupom.
Dokaz:
https://prnt.sc/oL_-DKdOkO7v
https://prnt.sc/RB2VN3fUvksX
Važno je napomenuti da je nakon situacije u vezi sa bonusom, ona nastavila sa dodatnim depozitima, a u trenutku kada je provajder platforme blokirao račun, preostali saldo na računu je bio 0,40 evra.
Pre toga, kupac je uspešno podigao dve uplate od po 500 evra, obrađene nekoliko dana ranije.
Stoga, igraču se ne duguje nikakav preostali dug.
Zaključak :
Uslovi bonusa su pravilno primenjeni u skladu sa klauzulom 10.1.3 b).
Ograničenje povlačenja važi bez obzira na korišćenje bonusa.
Blokadu naloga je pokrenuo provajder platforme zbog povraćaja sredstava.
Stoga smatramo da su sve preduzete mere bile u potpunosti u skladu sa našim Uslovima i standardnim procedurama.
Molimo vas da nas obavestite ako je potrebno dodatno pojašnjenje.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Tim CristalPoker-a
Dear Michal,
Thank you for your message and for reviewing this case.
We would like to clarify the situation based on our Bonus Terms and Conditions and the sequence of events on the player’s account.
As already communicated to the player via email, according to clause 10.1.3 b) of our Bonus Terms and Conditions:
Bonuses that come with a deposit requirement (clause 10.2, 10.3; Sports Bonuses and Live Casino Bonuses) have limits on withdrawal of 5 times the bonus amount received and are wager-free. Any balance above the maximum withdrawal amount is forfeited once the player reaches this limit or submits a withdrawal request.
In line with this rule, once a deposit bonus is credited to the account, it is considered active, and the maximum withdrawal limit applies regardless of whether the bonus funds were used in gameplay or not.
In this specific case:
The player received a 100€ bonus.
Therefore, the maximum withdrawable amount is 500€ (5× bonus).
Any balance exceeding this amount was forfeited in accordance with the Terms.
This condition is clearly stated in our Bonus Terms and applied consistently to all players.
Regarding the gameplay and "unused bonus" argument:
While the player claims that the bonus was not used during gameplay, this does not affect the applicability of the withdrawal cap. The limitation is linked to the activation of the bonus, not to whether the bonus balance was consumed during gameplay.
Regarding the account closure:
Additionally, we would like to clarify that the player’s account was not closed by our team directly.
The account was blocked by our platform provider due to a chargeback registered by the player within the provider’s network.
This action is in line with clause 9 (d) and (e) of our Terms and Conditions:
9 (d) – involvement or suspected involvement in fraudulent activities.
9 (e) – initiating a chargeback or reversing deposits made to the account.
Please note:
We were informed about this only after the player contacted us regarding access issues.
Proof:
https://prnt.sc/oL_-DKdOkO7w
https://prnt.sc/RB2VN3fUvqsX
It is important to mention that after the situation regarding the bonus, she proceeded to make additional deposits, and at the time the account was blocked by the platform provider, the remaining balance on the account was €0.40.
Prior to this, the customer had successfully withdrawn two payments of €500 each, processed a few days earlier.
Therefore, no outstanding balance is owed to the player.
Conclusion:
The bonus terms were correctly applied as per clause 10.1.3 b).
The withdrawal limitation applies regardless of bonus usage.
The account block was initiated by the platform provider due to a chargeback.
We therefore consider that all actions taken were in full compliance with our Terms and standard procedures.
Please let us know if any further clarification is required.
Odgovor se i dalje ne bavi ključnim pitanjem ove žalbe, a to je konfiskacija dobitaka.
Do konfiskacije je došlo pre zatvaranja računa i bilo kakvih navodnih povraćaja sredstava, stoga ove stvari nisu povezane i ne treba ih koristiti za opravdanje odluke.
Pored toga, postoji jasna nedoslednost u vezi sa igrom Play'n GO:
U jednoj prilici, kazino je izjavio da igre Play'n GO ne koriste bonus sredstva.
Međutim, drugog dana, kada je drugi bonus bio aktivan, isti Play'n GO slotovi su prikazivali i koristili puni iznos (pravi + bonus).
Ovo postavlja kritično pitanje:
Pod kojim uslovima Play'n GO igre koriste bonus sredstva, a kada ne?
Mogu da obezbedim snimke ekrana sa:
• sesija igranja u kojoj su dobici konfiskovani
• posebna sesija gde su igre Play'n GO očigledno koristile bonus sredstva
Ova neslaganja direktno utiče na to da li je trebalo primeniti ograničenje bonusa.
Takođe, dokazi/snimci ekrana koje ste dostavili ne objašnjavaju niti opravdavaju konfiskaciju dobitaka.
Oni prikazuju samo internu oznaku („CHB/FRAUD ALERT") i opštu izjavu o povraćajima sredstava, bez ikakve vremenske linije ili dokaza koji to povezuju sa odlukom o konfiskaciji.
Dobitci su konfiskovani pre bilo kakvog navodnog povraćaja sredstava, stoga ove informacije nisu relevantne za suštinsko pitanje ove žalbe.
I takođe, kakve veze moji naknadni depoziti i legitimna povlačenja imaju sa konfiskacijom dobitaka?
Cristal Poker Casino,
The response still does not address the core issue of this complaint, which is the confiscation of winnings.
The confiscation occurred before the account closure and any alleged chargebacks, therefore these matters are unrelated and should not be used to justify the decision.
Additionally, there is a clear inconsistency regarding Play’n GO gameplay:
On one occasion, the casino stated that Play’n GO games do not use bonus funds.
However, on a different day, when another bonus was active, the same Play’n GO slots displayed and used the full balance (real + bonus).
This raises a critical question:
Under what conditions are Play’n GO games using bonus funds, and when are they not?
I can provide screenshots from:
•the gameplay session where the winnings were confiscated
•a separate session where Play’n GO games clearly used bonus funds
This discrepancy directly affects whether the bonus cap should have been applied.
Also Your provided evidence/ screenshots do not explain or justify the confiscation of winnings.
They only show an internal label ("CHB/FRAUD ALERT") and a general statement about chargebacks, without any timeline or evidence linking this to the confiscation decision.
The winnings were confiscated before any alleged chargeback, therefore this information is not relevant to the core issue of this complaint.
And also what relevance do my subsequent deposits and legitimate withdrawals have to the confiscation of winnings?
Želeli bismo još jednom da pojasnimo da korekcija stanja nije bila proizvoljna, već je primenjena strogo u skladu sa našim Uslovima i odredbama bonusa.
Kao što je prethodno objašnjeno, odlučujući faktor u ovom slučaju nije da li su bonus sredstva vidljivo korišćena tokom igre , već činjenica da je bonus na depozit pripisan i da je aktivan na računu .
Prema klauzuli 10.1.3 b) :
Maksimalni iznos isplate je ograničen na 5 puta veći od iznosa primljenog bonusa, bez obzira na igru, a svaki iznos koji prelazi ovaj limit se gubi nakon zahteva za isplatu.
Stoga:
Kada je bonus od 100€ dodeljen , pravilo je počelo da važi.
Maksimalni iznos isplate bio je ograničen na 500 evra.
Svaki iznos iznad ovog ograničenja je ispravno uklonjen u skladu sa Uslovima.
Što se tiče igre Play'n GO:
Ponašanje koje opisujete u vezi sa različitim sesijama ne menja primenu pravila.
Ovi tehnički prikazi ili načini igranja ne nadjačavaju Uslove bonusa , koji jasno definišu da je ograničenje isplate vezano za aktivaciju bonusa , a ne za način na koji su sredstva vizuelno predstavljena ili potrošena tokom igranja.
U vezi sa zatvaranjem naloga i kasnijim aktivnostima:
U pravu ste da je do korekcije stanja došlo pre zatvaranja računa i mi ne povezujemo ova dva događaja kao opravdanje za ograničenje bonusa.
Pojašnjenje u vezi sa:
naknadne depozite
uspešnih isplata
i konačno stanje na računu
je dato samo da bi se pokazalo da:
Vaš nalog je ostao potpuno operativan nakon ovog „bonus slučaja".
Uspešno ste podigli ukupno 1.000 evra.
i nikakva preostala sredstva nisu zadržana nakon zatvaranja računa.
Da sumiramo:
Ograničenje povlačenja je primenjeno isključivo na osnovu aktivacije bonusa , kao što je navedeno u klauzuli 10.1.3 b).
Igranje ili vidljivost bonusa ne utiču na ovo pravilo.
Oduzeti iznos predstavlja deo koji prelazi dozvoljeni maksimalni iznos podizanja.
Na vašem računu ne ostaju dodatna sredstva neisplaćena.
I sve preduzete mere bile su u potpunosti u skladu sa našim Uslovima i odredbama.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Tim CristalPoker-a
Dear vienalga,
We would like to clarify once again that the balance correction was not arbitrary, but applied strictly in accordance with our Bonus Terms and Conditions.
As previously explained, the decisive factor in this case is not whether the bonus funds were visibly used during gameplay, but the fact that a deposit bonus was credited and active on the account.
According to clause 10.1.3 b):
The maximum withdrawal is limited to 5× the bonus amount received, regardless of gameplay, and any balance exceeding this limit is forfeited upon withdrawal request.
Therefore:
Once the 100€ bonus was credited, the rule became applicable.
The maximum withdrawal was capped at 500€.
Any amount above this limit was correctly removed in line with the Terms.
Regarding Play’n GO gameplay:
The behavior you describe regarding different sessions does not change the application of the rule.
These technical display or gameplay do not override the Bonus Terms, which clearly define that the withdrawal cap is tied to bonus activation, not to how balances are visually presented or consumed during gameplay.
Regarding account closure and later activity:
You are correct that the balance correction occurred before the account closure, and we are not linking these two events as justification for the bonus limitation.
The clarification regarding:
subsequent deposits
successful withdrawals
and final account balance
was provided only to demonstrate that:
your account remained fully operational after this "bonus case".
you were able to successfully withdraw a total of €1,000.
and no remaining funds were withheld after the account closure.
To summarize:
The withdrawal cap was applied strictly based on bonus activation, as per clause 10.1.3 b).
Gameplay or bonus visibility does not affect this rule.
The confiscated amount represents the portion exceeding the allowed maximum withdrawal.
No additional funds remain unpaid to your account.
And all the actions taken were fully compliant with our Terms and Conditions.
Na osnovu odgovora kazina, čini se da čak i u slučajevima nedoslednog ponašanja u igri ili potencijalnih tehničkih problema, ishod ostaje nepromenjen i uvek u korist operatera.
To efikasno znači da se smatra nebitnim da li se dogodio tehnički kvar ili ne, i isto pravilo se primenjuje bez obzira na to kako se bonus zapravo prikazuje ili koristi tokom igre.
Takav pristup je obmanjujući za igrače i izaziva ozbiljnu zabrinutost u pogledu pravičnosti i transparentnosti Uslova i odredbi. Od igrača se ne može očekivati da se oslanjaju na pravila koja se primenjuju nezavisno od toga kako sistem zapravo funkcioniše u praksi.
Štaviše, ovaj ključni uslov nije pravilno odražen ili vidljiv tokom igre. Ako sistem jasno ne naznači kada bonus pravila aktivno utiču na stanje, igrači ostaju bez mogućnosti da razumeju ili provere kako se njihova sredstva koriste.
Zbog toga su Uslovi korišćenja po svojoj prirodi nepravedni, jer se mogu primenjivati retroaktivno bez obzira na to šta se igraču zapravo prikazuje tokom igre.
Ako se ovo pitanje ne reši na odgovarajući način, proslediću slučaj nadležnom regulatornom organu na preispitivanje.
Dear Michal,
Based on the casino’s response, it appears that even in cases of inconsistent gameplay behavior or potential technical issues, the outcome remains unchanged and always in favor of the operator.
This effectively means that whether a technical glitch occurs or not is considered irrelevant, and the same rule is applied regardless of how the bonus is actually displayed or used during gameplay.
Such an approach is misleading to players and raises serious concerns about fairness and transparency of the Terms and Conditions. Players cannot be expected to rely on rules that are applied independently of how the system actually functions in practice.
Furthermore, this key condition is not properly reflected or visible during gameplay. If the system does not clearly indicate when bonus rules are actively affecting the balance, players are left without the ability to understand or verify how their funds are being used.
This makes the Terms and Conditions inherently unfair, as they can be applied retroactively regardless of what is actually shown to the player during gameplay.
If this matter is not properly addressed, I will escalate the case further to the relevant regulatory authority for review.
Posebno cenim detaljno objašnjenje kazina Cristal Poker o toku događaja i faktorima koji su u vezi sa ovim pitanjem.
Draga Vienalga,
Hvala vam što ste podelili svoje gledište. Iako imate apsolutno pravo na svoje mišljenje u vezi sa ovom situacijom i važećim pravilima, to ne znači nužno da je vaše tumačenje ispravno ili da sama pravila nisu važeća. Primena svih pravila za bonuse, uključujući ograničenja isplate od trenutka aktiviranja bonusa, standardna je praksa u skoro svim onlajn kazinima. Osim ako nije izričito drugačije navedeno u pravilima, ova ograničenja ostaju na snazi od trenutka aktivacije do potpunog završetka klađenja, bez obzira na to kako se stanje prikazuje tokom igre.
Pošto je kazino primenio pravila tačno onako kako je navedeno u uslovima koje ste prihvatili, ne možemo pronaći nikakvu grešku u njihovim postupcima. Stoga će ova žalba biti zatvorena kao neopravdana.
Svakako imate pravo da se ne složite sa ovim zaključkom i možete se obratiti organu za licenciranje kazina ili nadležnom regulatornom telu u vašoj jurisdikciji ako i dalje smatrate da je vaš stav opravdan, ali mi nismo u mogućnosti da ponudimo bilo kakvu dodatnu pomoć u vezi sa ovim pitanjem. Slobodno me obavestite o licenciranju ili odluci regulatornog tela, ukoliko se odlučite za ovaj put na michal.k@casino.guru .
Žao nam je što nismo mogli biti od veće pomoći ovom prilikom.
Ukoliko u budućnosti naiđete na bilo kakve probleme sa ovim ili bilo kojim drugim kazinom u vezi sa kazino igrama, slobodno nas kontaktirajte i mi ćemo se potruditi da vam pomognemo.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Mihal
Kazino Guru
Thank you all for your responses.
I particularly appreciate the detailed explanation by the Cristal Poker Casino on the course of events and the factors involved in this matter.
Dear vienalga,
Thank you for sharing your perspective. While you are absolutely entitled to your opinion regarding this situation and the applicable rules, it does not necessarily mean that your interpretation is the correct one or that the rules themselves are not valid. The application of all bonus rules including withdrawal limits from the moment a bonus is activated is a standard practice across nearly all online casinos. Unless explicitly stated in the rules otherwise, these limitations remain in effect from the point of activation until wagering is fully completed, regardless of how the balance is displayed during play.
Because the casino applied the rules exactly as stated in the terms you accepted, we cannot find any fault in their actions. As such, this complaint will be closed as Unjustified.
You certainly have the right to disagree with this conclusion and can reach out to the casino licensing authority or the appropriate regulatory body in your jurisdiction if you still feel justified in your position, but we are unable to offer any additional assistance regarding this issue. Feel free to let me know of the licensing or the regulatory authority decision, should you opt for this route at michal.k@casino.guru.
We are sorry we could not be of more help on this occasion.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino regarding casino games in the future, please feel free to reach out to us, and we will try our best to help.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno:
Poslali smo Vam e-mail
Proverite svoj inboks i kliknite na link koji smo Vam poslali: youremail@gmail.com
Link će isteći za 72 časa.
Proverite svoj "Spam" ili "Promotions" folder ili kliknite na dugme ispod.