Draga Veronika,
Hvala vam što ste mi se javili. Želeo bih da vam pružim neke dodatne detalje u vezi sa mojim slučajem.
Moj nalog kod CrownGreen-a još uvek nije zatvoren. Trenutno je aktivan i još uvek mogu da mu pristupim i koristim ga, uključujući uplate depozita i kockanje.
Dana 14. avgusta 2026. godine, po prvi put, eksplicitno sam zatražio da se moj nalog zatvori. Takođe sam jasno obavestio kazino da imam zavisnost od kockanja/problem sa kockanjem i da želim da mi se nalog zatvori iz tog razloga.
Umesto da mi odmah zatvori nalog ili primeni samoisključenje, kazino je pokušao da me zadrži kao mušteriju i ponudio mi je alternativna rešenja. Tokom ovog perioda, moj nalog je ostao potpuno aktivan i dalje sam mogao da uplaćujem depozite i kockam se.
Nakon toga sam ih nekoliko puta kontaktirao i više puta insistirao da želim da mi se nalog trajno zatvori. Uprkos mojim ponovljenim zahtevima, nisu zatvorili nalog.
Na kraju su mi rekli da, kako bih zatvorio svoj račun, prvo moram da dostavim nekoliko dokumenata, uključujući:
kopiju moje lične karte/pasoša,
dokaz o mojoj adresi stanovanja,
snimak ekrana mog poslednjeg depozita,
i dokument o izvoru bogatstva/povezanom sa porezima.
Rekli su mi da moj nalog prvo mora biti verifikovan i da tek nakon procesa verifikacije mogu da ga zatvore.
Ne razumem zašto bih morao da završim potpunu verifikaciju i dostavim dokument o izvoru bogatstva da bi mi se zatvorio kockarski račun, posebno nakon što sam ih eksplicitno obavestio da imam problem sa kockanjem i zatražio samoisključenje.
Nisam dostavio ove dokumente jer mi je prioritet bio jednostavno da prestanem da se kockam i da mi se račun zatvori.
Ono što me najviše brine je to što čak i sada, uprkos mojim ponovljenim zahtevima i uprkos tome što sam ih obavestio o svojoj zavisnosti od kockanja, nalog ostaje aktivan i još uvek mogu da ga koristim.
Imam snimke ekrana i prepisku koja sve ovo dokumentuje, uključujući moj prvobitni zahtev, odgovore kazina i njihove naknadne zahteve za dokumentima. Drago mi je da vam sve ovo prosledim na pregled.
Bilo bi mi drago ako biste mogli konkretno da procenite da li moj prvobitni zahtev treba smatrati zahtevom za samoisključenje, a ne samo standardnim zahtevom za zatvaranje naloga, i da li je kazino trebalo da ograniči moj nalog na dalje depozite i kockanje nakon što sam ih obavestio o svojoj zavisnosti od kockanja.
Dear Veronika,
Thank you for getting back to me. I would like to provide you with some additional details regarding my case.
My account with CrownGreen has still not been closed. It is currently active, and I am still able to access and use the account, including making deposits and gambling.
On 14 August 2026, for the first time, I explicitly requested that my account be closed. I also clearly informed the casino that I have a gambling addiction/problem with gambling and that I wanted my account closed for this reason.
Instead of immediately closing my account or applying self-exclusion, the casino tried to keep me as a customer and offered me alternative solutions. During this period, my account remained fully active and I was still able to make deposits and gamble.
I contacted them several times afterwards and repeatedly insisted that I wanted my account permanently closed. Despite my repeated requests, they did not close the account.
Eventually, they told me that in order to close my account, I first had to provide a number of documents, including:
a copy of my ID/passport,
proof of my residential address,
a screenshot of my last deposit,
and a Source of Wealth/tax-related document.
They told me that my account first had to be verified and that only after the verification process could they proceed with closing it.
I do not understand why I would need to complete a full verification and provide a Source of Wealth document in order to have my gambling account closed, especially after I had explicitly informed them that I have a gambling problem and requested self-exclusion.
I did not provide these documents because my priority was simply to stop gambling and have the account closed.
What concerns me most is that even now, despite my repeated requests and despite informing them about my gambling addiction, the account remains active and I can still use it.
I have screenshots and correspondence documenting all of this, including my original request, the casino's responses, and their subsequent requests for documents. I am happy to forward all of this to you for review.
I would appreciate it if you could specifically assess whether my original request should be considered a self-exclusion request rather than merely a standard account closure request, and whether the casino should have restricted my account from further deposits and gambling after I informed them about my gambling addiction.
Automatski prevedeno: