Podnosim žalbu u vezi sa Gangsta Casino / Boom Line BV u vezi sa konfiskacijom približno 7.400 evra dobitka.
Dobio sam bonus koji je bio podložan maksimalnom ograničenju isplate od 10 puta većem od iznosa bonusa. Kazino je prvobitno primenio ovo ograničenje i shodno tome smanjio moj saldo, ostavljajući približno 600 evra dostupnih na mom računu.
Zatim sam nastavio da igram sa tim preostalim stanjem i ostvario dalje dobitke. Kazino je potom ponovo konfiskovao dodatne dobitke, tvrdeći da je preostalih 600 evra i dalje povezano sa originalnim bonusom i stoga ostalo podložno istom ograničenju maksimalnog dobitka dok se ne povuče.
Moja zamerka je da ovo tumačenje nije jasno navedeno u važećim uslovima bonusa. Uslovi predviđaju da se, nakon što se ispune uslovi za klađenje, bonus sredstva i dobici isplaćuju u novčanik za pravi novac i da se dobici koji prelaze maksimalni limit za povlačenje uklanjaju u fazi povlačenja. Oni ne navode jasno da se ograničenje maksimalnog dobitka može više puta primenjivati na buduće dobitke generisane iz već prilagođenog stanja pravog novca.
Više puta sam tražio od kazina da identifikuje tačnu ugovornu klauzulu koja podržava ovo tumačenje, ali nisu dali jasan odgovor.
Takođe sam ih zamolio da dostave podatke o eksternom telu za alternativno rešavanje sporova na koje se pozivaju u svojoj proceduri za žalbe, ali te informacije nisu dostavljene.
Stoga zahtevam nezavisnu reviziju da li je ponovljena konfiskacija mojih dobitaka bila pravedna i potkrepljena objavljenim uslovima kazina.
Αυτο ειναι αρκετο για uvodna žalba. Αν σου ζητησουν μετα dokaza / hronologija, τοτε τους δινουμε screenshots, τους ορους, τα emails κραι ακαι α ημερομηνιες.
I am submitting a complaint regarding Gangsta Casino / Boom Line B.V. concerning the confiscation of approximately €7,400 in winnings.
I had received a bonus subject to a maximum withdrawal limit of x10 the bonus amount. The casino initially applied this limit and reduced my balance accordingly, leaving approximately €600 available in my account.
I then continued playing with that remaining balance and generated further winnings. The casino subsequently confiscated the additional winnings again, arguing that the remaining €600 continued to be linked to the original bonus and therefore remained subject to the same maximum-win restriction until withdrawn.
My complaint is that this interpretation is not clearly stated in the applicable bonus terms. The terms provide that, once wagering requirements are completed, bonus funds and winnings are released to the real money wallet, and that winnings exceeding the maximum withdrawal limit are removed at the withdrawal stage. They do not clearly state that the maximum-win cap may be repeatedly reapplied to future winnings generated from the already adjusted real-money balance.
I have repeatedly asked the casino to identify the exact contractual clause supporting this interpretation, but they have not provided a clear answer.
I have also asked them to provide the details of the external ADR body referred to in their own complaints procedure, but this information has not been provided.
I am therefore requesting an independent review of whether the repeated confiscation of my winnings was fair and supported by the casino’s published terms.
Αυτό είναι αρκετό για opening complaint. Αν σου ζητήσουν μετά evidence / chronology, τότε τους δίνουμε screenshots, τους όρους, τα emails και ακριβείς ημερομηνίες.
Automatski prevedeno: