Ozbiljno kršenje propisa o odgovornom kockanju – zahtevi za samoisključenje ignorisani
Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa HolyLuck Casino zbog neprimene mera odgovornog kockanja i ignorisanja ponovljenih zahteva za samoisključenje.
Od novembra 2025. godine sam više puta kontaktirao kazino tražeći trajno samoisključenje i zatvaranje mog naloga zbog zabrinutosti zbog zavisnosti od kockanja. Moji zahtevi su poslati putem e-pošte.
Uprkos ovim ponovljenim zahtevima, kazino nije zatvorio moj nalog i nastavio je da mi dozvoljava da uplaćujem depozite i kockam se. Kao rezultat toga, mogao sam da nastavim sa kockanjem i izgubio sam više od 10.000 evra nakon mog početnog zahteva za samoisključenje.
Prema standardima odgovornog kockanja, kada igrač jasno zatraži samoisključenje, operater treba odmah da blokira nalog i spreči sve dalje depozite ili aktivnosti kockanja. U mom slučaju, ova zaštita nije primenjena .
Moj nalog je zatvoren tek nakon što sam eskalirao situaciju i podneo žalbe. Ovo potvrđuje da je kazino imao mogućnost da ranije zatvori nalog, ali to nije učinio uprkos mojim ponovljenim zahtevima.
Verujem da ovo predstavlja ozbiljan propust u poštovanju obaveza odgovornog kockanja i politika zaštite igrača.
Stoga, ljubazno molim:
Potpun pregled mog slučaja.
Povraćaj depozita uplaćenih nakon mog prvog zahteva za samoisključenje.
Istraga o postupanju kazina sa zahtevima za odgovorno kockanje.
Mogu da pružim potkrepljujuće dokaze, uključujući:
Imejlovi sa zahtevom za zatvaranje naloga i samoisključenje
Istorija transakcija koja prikazuje depozite nakon mog zahteva
Potvrda da je nalog zatvoren tek nakon moje žalbe
Hvala vam što ste razmotrili moju žalbu i pomogli u vezi sa ovim pitanjem.
Serious responsible gambling violation – self-exclusion requests ignored
I am submitting this complaint regarding HolyLuck Casino for failing to apply responsible gambling measures and ignoring repeated self-exclusion requests.
Since November 2025 I have contacted the casino multiple times requesting permanent self-exclusion and closure of my account due to gambling addiction concerns. My requests were sent via email.
Despite these repeated requests, the casino failed to close my account and continued to allow me to deposit and gamble. As a result, I was able to continue gambling and lost more than €10,000 after my initial self-exclusion request.
According to responsible gambling standards, once a player clearly requests self-exclusion, the operator should immediately block the account and prevent any further deposits or gambling activity. In my case, this protection was not applied.
My account was only closed after I escalated the situation and filed complaints. This confirms that the casino had the ability to close the account earlier but failed to do so despite my repeated requests.
I believe this represents a serious failure to comply with responsible gambling obligations and player protection policies.
Therefore, I kindly request:
A full review of my case.
A refund of deposits made after my first self-exclusion request.
An investigation into the casino’s handling of responsible gambling requests.
I am able to provide supporting evidence including:
Emails requesting account closure and self-exclusion
Transaction history showing deposits after my request
Confirmation that the account was closed only after my complaint
Thank you for reviewing my complaint and assisting with this matter.
Automatski prevedeno: