Dragi kazino Horus,
Hvala vam što ste pružili dodatne informacije i dokaze.
Potvrđujem poruku prikazanu igraču; međutim, ona ne navodi eksplicitno da igrač treba ili mora da povuče sredstva, niti ukazuje da maksimalni limiti isplate ostaju na snazi za dalju igru, uprkos tome što je bonus klađenje završeno i početna podešavanja stanja su izvršena.
Kao što sam već napomenuo, prema našem Kodeksu o fer kockanju, verujemo da ako igrač odluči da nastavi da igra sa sredstvima i prihvati rizik, trebalo bi da ima pravo na sve dobitke koje ostvari, baš kao što bi imao da je sam uplatio ta sredstva na račun.
Iako je igrač zaista rizikovao sredstva, njegova mogućnost za pobedu bila je ograničena, što je rezultiralo nepravednom situacijom jer, kako izgleda, igrač nije bio na odgovarajući način obavešten o preostalim maksimalnim ograničenjima isplate.
Želeo bih da ponovim da se industrija razvija i da mnogi kazina sada primenjuju ograničenja vezana za bonuse direktno na nivou softvera – pristup koji snažno podržavamo. Ova situacija se mogla relativno lako izbeći primenom odgovarajućih mera, umesto da se teret prebacuje na igrača.
Teško mi je da identifikujem bilo kakvu nepravednu prednost koju je igrač stekao time što je odlučio da ne podigne sredstva, već se (sasvim razumljivo) odlučio da okuša sreću dodatnim igranjem. Ukoliko bi okolnosti bile obrnute, da li biste razmotrili povraćaj izgubljenih sredstava? Nadam se da razumete poentu koju pokušavam da prenesem.
Imajući ovo u vidu, ljubazno vas molimo da ponovo razmotrite svoju odluku i istražite da li se može postići obostrano prihvatljivo i srazmerno rešenje.
Dear Horus Casino,
Thank you for providing the additional information and evidence.
I acknowledge the message displayed to the player; however, it does not explicitly state that the player should or must withdraw the funds, nor does it indicate that the maximum payout limits remain in effect for further gameplay, despite the bonus wagering being completed and the initial balance adjustments having been made.
As I previously mentioned, according to our Fair Gambling Code, we believe that if a player chooses to continue playing with the funds and accepts the risk, they should be entitled to any winnings they accrue, just as they would be if they had deposited those funds into the account themselves.
While the player was indeed risking the funds, their opportunity to win was limited, which resulted in an unfair situation because, as it seems, the player was not appropriately informed of the remaining maximum payout limits.
I would like to reiterate that the industry is evolving, and many casinos are now implementing bonus-related restrictions directly at the software level—an approach we strongly endorse. This situation could have been relatively easily avoided, by implementing appropriate measures, rather than placing the burden on the player.
I find it difficult to identify any unfair advantage gained by the player by choosing not to withdraw the funds and instead opting (quite understandably) to try their luck with additional gameplay. If the circumstances were reversed, would you consider refunding the lost funds? I hope you understand the point I'm trying to convey.
With this in mind, we kindly ask that you reconsider your decision and explore whether a mutually acceptable and proportionate resolution can be reached.
Automatski prevedeno: