Laki Drims je odbio i poništio moje isplate u ukupnom iznosu od približno 21.000 kanadskih dolara. Kazino kaže da je to bilo zato što sam navodno prekršio pravilo o maksimalnoj opkladi od 8 kanadskih dolara dok je bonus bio aktivan.
Osporavam ovo objašnjenje. Nisam svesno aktivirao ili igrao sa bonus novcem ili besplatnim okretajima kada su generisani sporni dobici. Koliko sam razumeo, igrao sam sa deponovanim pravim novcem.
Pre značajne dobitke, kladio sam se približno 2 kanadska dolara po okretaju. Imam dokaze iz tog vremena koji pokazuju da je opklada od 2,00 kanadskih dolara povezana sa dobitkom od 20.538,00 kanadskih dolara. Kazino se ipak oslonio na određene transakcije od 20 i 30 kanadskih dolara kao dokaz kršenja maksimalne opklade.
Zamolio sam Lucky Dreams da mi dostavi dokaze specifične za račun koji pokazuju kada je navodni bonus aktiviran, koji depozit ga je pokrenuo, da li su sporne opklade napravljene bonusom ili pravim novcem, tačne zapise o opkladama/sesijama na koje se oslanja i kako je kazino izračunao konfiskaciju. Nisam dobio zadovoljavajuće objašnjenje potkrepljeno kompletnim osnovnim zapisima.
Sporni iznosi isplata iznosili su približno 6.000 CAD + 6.000 CAD + 6.000 CAD + 3.000 CAD, što je ukupno iznosilo 21.000 CAD.
Laki Drims je tretirao svoju odluku kao konačnu uprkos mojim zahtevima za pojašnjenje i prateću dokumentaciju. Takođe sam pokušao da eskaliram stvar putem ADR/regulatornih kanala.
Tražim od Casino Guru-a da nezavisno pregleda dokaze i, posebno, utvrdi da li je navodni bonus zaista bio aktivan tokom sporne igre, šta predstavljaju transakcije od 20/30 CAD, da li su to bili bonusi ili opklade za pravi novac i da li je konfiskacija približno 21.000 CAD od strane kazina potkrepljena osnovnim računom i zapisima igre.
Mogu da obezbedim prepisku kazina, evidenciju o povlačenju novca, snimke ekrana, DSAR/evidenciju o nalogu i ostalo
Lucky Dreams refused and voided my withdrawals totaling approximately CAD 21,000. The casino says this was because I allegedly breached an 8 CAD maximum-bet rule while a bonus was active.
I dispute this explanation. I did not knowingly activate or play with bonus money or free spins when the disputed winnings were generated. My understanding was that I was playing with deposited real-money funds.
Before the significant win, I was betting approximately CAD 2 per spin. I have contemporaneous evidence showing a CA$2.00 bet associated with a CA$20,538.00 win. The casino has nevertheless relied on certain CAD 20 and CAD 30 transactions as evidence of a maximum-bet violation.
I have asked Lucky Dreams to provide the account-specific evidence showing when the alleged bonus was activated, which deposit triggered it, whether the disputed wagers were made with bonus or real-money funds, the exact wager/session records relied upon, and how the casino calculated the confiscation. I have not received a satisfactory explanation supported by the complete underlying records.
The disputed withdrawals were approximately CAD 6,000 + CAD 6,000 + CAD 6,000 + CAD 3,000, totaling CAD 21,000.
Lucky Dreams has treated its decision as final despite my requests for clarification and supporting records. I have also attempted to escalate the matter through the ADR/regulatory channels.
I am asking Casino Guru to independently review the evidence and, in particular, determine whether the alleged bonus was actually active during the disputed play, what the CAD 20/CAD 30 transactions represent, whether they were bonus or real-money wagers, and whether the casino's confiscation of approximately CAD 21,000 is supported by the underlying account and game records.
I can provide the casino's correspondence, withdrawal records, screenshots, DSAR/account records, and other
Automatski prevedeno: