Podnosim ovu žalbu jer mi je kazino konfiskovao stanje na računu na osnovu tvrdnje da sam koristio VPN. Ova tvrdnja je lažna.
Nisam koristio VPN da bih pristupio svom nalogu. Fizički sam boravio sa porodicom u Nemačkoj i povezivao sam se preko redovne nemačke internet veze. Činjenica da je moja IP adresa bila iz Nemačke ne znači da sam koristio VPN.
IP adresa koja je korišćena za moje prijavljivanje bila je 148.59.74.6. Informacije o javnoj mreži identifikuju ovu adresu kao deo mreže Orange Germany (AS5511) i ne postoje javni dokazi da pripada VPN provajderu ili hosting servisu. Ako kazino tvrdi drugačije, molim ih da dostave konkretne tehničke dokaze koji dokazuju da je ova IP adresa bila VPN ili proksi u vreme mog prijavljivanja.
Štaviše, ni Poljska, gde je moj nalog registrovan, ni Nemačka, gde sam boravio, nisu navedene kao ograničena jurisdikcija u Uslovima i odredbama kazina. Stoga, čak i ako sam se prijavio iz Nemačke, nisam prekršio nikakvo geografsko ograničenje.
Moj nalog je odavno u potpunosti verifikovan. Kazino je već prihvatio moju verifikaciju identiteta i uspešno sam završio desetine depozita i isplata u prošlosti bez ikakvih problema.
Sporni saldo ne potiče od bonusa ili promotivnih ponuda. Dobijen je normalnim igranjem koristeći moja sopstvena uplaćena sredstva.
U stvari, tokom poslednjih nekoliko nedelja izgubio sam više novca nego što sam podigao iz kazina. To jasno pokazuje da sam bio samo običan igrač, a ne neko ko pokušava da zloupotrebi promocije ili iskoristi kazino.
Kazino nije pružio nikakve dokaze da sam prekršio bilo koje pravilo. Umesto toga, izneo je ozbiljnu optužbu bez predstavljanja ikakvog tehničkog dokaza. Samo navođenje da je korišćen VPN nije dovoljno. Ako se takva tvrdnja iznese, ona treba da bude potkrepljena objektivnim dokazima.
Ljubazno molim Casino Guru da zatraži od kazina da dostavi tehničke dokaze na kojima je zasnovana ova odluka. Ako kazino ne može da dokaže da sam zaista koristio VPN ili prekršio bilo koju odredbu Uslova i odredbi, s poštovanjem molim da mi se vrati konfiskovani iznos.
Hvala vam na vremenu i što ste pravedno razmotrili moju žalbu
Takođe bih želeo da istaknem da ovu nemačku IP adresu koristim već dugo vremena. To je statička IP adresa, a ne novododeljena, i kazino nikada ranije nije izrazio nikakvu zabrinutost zbog toga.
U stvari, tek krajem juna, dok sam koristio istu IP adresu, kontaktirao me je VIP tim LuckyGem-a sa promotivnim ponudama koje su me ohrabrivale da nastavim da igram. Ovo pokazuje da kazino nije imao problema sa aktivnošću mog naloga ili IP adresom u tom trenutku. Stoga je nedosledno i nepravedno iznenada tvrditi da je ista IP adresa bila povezana sa korišćenjem VPN-a tek nakon što sam zatražio isplatu.
Štaviše, već sam koristio ovu istu IP adresu u prethodnim prilikama, a kazino je obradio moju isplatu bez ikakvih problema. Ovo jasno pokazuje da je kazino prethodno prihvatio i aktivnost mog naloga i ovu IP adresu kao legitimne.
Stoga je nedosledno i nepravedno odjednom tvrditi da ista IP adresa ukazuje na korišćenje VPN-a tek nakon kasnijeg zahteva za isplatu. Ako je kazino zaista verovao da ova IP adresa krši njegove Uslove i odredbe, trebalo je odmah da pokrene problem, a ne tek nakon što sam akumulirao iznos koji se može isplatiti.
I am submitting this complaint because the casino has confiscated my balance based on an allegation that I used a VPN. This allegation is false.
I did not use a VPN to access my account. I was physically staying with my family in Germany and connected through a regular German internet connection. The fact that my IP address was from Germany does not mean that I was using a VPN.
The IP address used for my login was 148.59.74.6. Public network information identifies this address as part of the Orange Germany network (AS5511), and there is no public evidence that it belongs to a VPN provider or a hosting service. If the casino claims otherwise, I ask them to provide specific technical evidence proving that this IP address was a VPN or proxy at the time of my login.
Furthermore, neither Poland, where my account is registered, nor Germany, where I was staying, is listed as a restricted jurisdiction in the casino's Terms and Conditions. Therefore, even if I logged in from Germany, I did not violate any geographical restriction.
My account has been fully verified for a long time. The casino has already accepted my identity verification, and I have successfully completed dozens of deposits and withdrawals in the past without any issues.
The disputed balance does not originate from bonuses or promotional offers. It was obtained through normal gameplay using my own deposited funds.
In fact, during the last few weeks I have lost more money than I withdrew from the casino. This clearly shows that I was simply a regular player and not someone attempting to abuse promotions or exploit the casino.
The casino has provided no evidence that I violated any rule. Instead, it has made a serious accusation without presenting any technical proof. Simply stating that a VPN was used is not sufficient. If such an allegation is made, it should be supported by objective evidence.
I kindly ask Casino Guru to request that the casino provides the technical evidence on which this decision was based. If the casino cannot prove that I actually used a VPN or violated any provision of the Terms and Conditions, I respectfully ask that my confiscated balance be returned.
Thank you for your time and for reviewing my complaint fairly
I would also like to point out that this German IP address has been used by me for a long time. It is a static IP address, not a newly assigned one, and the casino has never raised any concerns about it before.
In fact, as recently as the end of June, while using the same IP address, I was contacted by the LuckyGem VIP Team with promotional offers encouraging me to continue playing. This demonstrates that the casino had no issue with my account activity or the IP address at that time. It is therefore inconsistent and unfair to suddenly claim that the very same IP address was associated with VPN usage only after I requested a withdrawal.
Furthermore, I had already used this same IP address on previous occasions, and the casino processed my withdrawal without any issues. This clearly demonstrates that the casino had previously accepted both my account activity and this IP address as legitimate.
It is therefore inconsistent and unfair to suddenly claim that the very same IP address indicates VPN usage only after a later withdrawal request. If the casino genuinely believed this IP address violated its Terms and Conditions, it should have raised the issue immediately, not only after I accumulated a withdrawable balance.
Automatski prevedeno: