Zdravo Atila,
Hvala vam što ste razmotrili moju žalbu.
Verujem da postoji jedan važan nesporazum u vezi sa mojim slučajem.
Ne sporim da je bonus za povraćaj novca imao zahtev za klađenje od 10 puta i maksimalni limit dobitka od 10 puta dok je bonus bio aktivan.
Moja žalba se odnosi na činjenicu da je isplata od 4.000 evra izvršena nakon što je klađenje na povraćaj novca već bilo završeno.
LuckyVibe mi je dostavio kompletnu GDPR/DSAR ZIP datoteku pod nazivom DSAR_O_128920_luckyvibe.zip. Ona sadrži, između ostalog, bonus_issues.csv, bets.csv i payments.csv. To su interni zapisi kompanije LuckyVibe i oni omogućavaju rekonstrukciju tačnog redosleda.
Relevantni bonus za povraćaj novca bio je 38,39 evra.
Stoga:
10x zahtev za klađenje = 383,90 €
U datoteci bonus_issues.csv, LuckyVibe beleži:
Dnevni povraćaj novca nivoa 2 – 38,39 €
Ulog: 384,40 € / 383,90 € (100%)
Faza: „Opklada završena"
Ažurirano: 2026-09-03 03:59:34
Konačna opklada koja je i dalje označena bonusom je opklada sa ID-om 125959776:
Stanje pre: 101,09 €
Ulog: 1,60 €
Stanje nakon: 99,49 €
Bonus izdanje: Dnevni povraćaj novca nivoa 2
Završeno je u 03:59:34.680.
Sledeća opklada, ID 125959779, počela je u 03:59:34.821, samo 0,141 sekundu kasnije:
Stanje pre: 99,49 €
Problem sa bonusom: prazno / nije dodeljen bonus
To znači da je, prema evidenciji kompanije LuckyVibe, klađenje za povraćaj novca završeno kada je moj saldo bio samo 99,49 evra.
Ovo je ključno jer je 99,49 evra bilo daleko ispod maksimalnog limita dobitka od 383,90 evra. Stoga nije bilo viška dobitaka za uklanjanje kada se završilo klađenje na povrat novca.
Zatim sam nastavio da igram bez dodeljivanja bonusa za povraćaj novca mojim opkladama. Moj saldo se povećao na 393,56 evra, a zatražio sam isplatu od 300 evra u 04:44:05.
Kasnije su odigrane i izgubljene odvojene starije nagrade. Istorija klađenja pokazuje da je moj saldo za igranje na kraju pao na samo 0,02 €.
U 06:22:03, prethodno podizanje od 300 evra je opozvano.
Prva opklada nakon ovog opoziva počela je sa:
Stanje pre: 300,02 €
Bonus broj: prazan
Od tog trenutka do isplate od 4.000 evra, podaci LuckyVibe-a sadrže 1.636 opklada, i svaka od njih ima prazno polje za izdavanje bonusa.
Ove kasnije opklade su generisale sporne dobitke.
Na primer, podaci o klađenju kompanije LuckyVibe pokazuju:
Ulog od 5 € → isplata od 2.385,50 € → stanje povećano sa 546,02 € na 2.926,52 €
Ulog od 10 € → isplata od 518 € → stanje povećano na 3.439,27 €
Ulog od 10€ → isplata od 648€ → stanje povećano na 3.769,27€
Ulog od 10 € → isplata od 1.278 € → stanje povećano na 4.341,57 €
Ulog od 20€ → isplata od 1.124€ → stanje povećano na 4.224,57€
Nijedna od ovih opklada nema dodeljen bonus u evidenciji LuckyVibe-a.
Moj saldo je kasnije dostigao maksimum od 4.690,57 evra i bio je 4.445,57 evra nakon moje poslednje opklade pre isplate.
Zatim sam zatražio podizanje 4.000 evra u 08:51:17.
Stoga je relevantni redosled prema podacima LuckyVibe-a:
Povrat novca od 38,39 € → klađenje završeno na 99,49 € → status „Opklada završena" → dodela bonusa nestaje → isplata od 300 € → ostale nagrade naknadno izgubljene → stanje 0,02 € → isplata od 300 € opozvana → stanje 300,02 € bez dodeljenog bonusa → 1.636 opklada bez ikakve dodele bonusa → stanje raste iznad 4.000 € → zatraženo je isplaćivanje od 4.000 €.
LuckyVibe je potom dozvolio samo 383,98 evra i konfiskovao 3.616,02 evra primenom prethodnog ograničenja maksimalnog dobitka za povraćaj novca na kasnije dobitke.
Stoga s poštovanjem molim da se žalba ne zaključi isključivo na osnovu postojanja klauzule o maksimalnom dobitku od 10 puta.
Ključno pitanje je da li se ta klauzula i dalje može primeniti na dobitke ostvarene nakon što je uslov za klađenje već ispunjen i nakon što je LuckyVibe-ov sistem prestao da dodeljuje bonus za povraćaj novca mojim opkladama.
Mogu da obezbedim kompletnu originalnu DSAR ZIP datoteku koju je dostavio LuckyVibe, uključujući gore pomenute CSV datoteke, kako bi Casino Guru mogao nezavisno da proveri svaku cifru i vremensku oznaku.
Hvala vam puno što ste još jednom razmotrili ovu konkretnu tačku.
Hello Attila,
thank you for reviewing my complaint.
I believe there is an important misunderstanding regarding my case.
I am not disputing that the cashback bonus had a 10x wagering requirement and a 10x maximum win limit while the bonus was active.
My complaint concerns the fact that the €4,000 withdrawal was generated after the cashback wagering had already been completed.
LuckyVibe has provided me with a complete GDPR/DSAR ZIP file named DSAR_O_128920_luckyvibe.zip. It contains, among other things, bonus_issues.csv, bets.csv and payments.csv. These are LuckyVibe’s own internal records, and they allow the exact sequence to be reconstructed.
The relevant cashback bonus was €38.39.
Therefore:
10x wagering requirement = €383.90
In bonus_issues.csv, LuckyVibe records:
Level 2 Daily Cashback – €38.39
Wager: €384.40 / €383.90 (100%)
Stage: "Wager Done"
Updated at: 2026-09-03 03:59:34
The final bet still marked with the bonus is bet ID 125959776:
Balance before: €101.09
Bet: €1.60
Balance after: €99.49
Bonus Issue: Level 2 Daily Cashback
It finished at 03:59:34.680.
The very next bet, ID 125959779, started at 03:59:34.821, only 0.141 seconds later:
Balance before: €99.49
Bonus Issue: empty / no bonus assigned
This means that, according to LuckyVibe’s own records, the cashback wagering was completed when my balance was only €99.49.
This is crucial because €99.49 was far below the €383.90 maximum win limit. There were therefore no excess winnings to remove when the cashback wagering ended.
I then continued playing without the cashback bonus being assigned to my bets. My balance increased to €393.56, and I requested a €300 withdrawal at 04:44:05.
Later, separate older rewards were played and lost. The betting history shows that my playable balance eventually fell to only €0.02.
At 06:22:03, the previous €300 withdrawal was recalled.
The first bet after this recall started with:
Balance before: €300.02
Bonus Issue: empty
From that point until the €4,000 withdrawal, LuckyVibe’s data contains 1,636 bets, and every single one has an empty Bonus Issue field.
These later bets generated the winnings in dispute.
For example, LuckyVibe’s own betting data shows:
€5 bet → €2,385.50 payoff → balance increased from €546.02 to €2,926.52
€10 bet → €518 payoff → balance increased to €3,439.27
€10 bet → €648 payoff → balance increased to €3,769.27
€10 bet → €1,278 payoff → balance increased to €4,341.57
€20 bet → €1,124 payoff → balance increased to €4,224.57
All of these bets have no bonus assigned in LuckyVibe’s own records.
My balance later reached a maximum of €4,690.57 and was €4,445.57 after my final bet before the withdrawal.
I then requested the €4,000 withdrawal at 08:51:17.
Therefore, the relevant sequence according to LuckyVibe’s own data is:
€38.39 cashback → wagering completed at €99.49 → status "Wager Done" → bonus assignment disappears → €300 withdrawal → other rewards subsequently lost → balance €0.02 → €300 withdrawal recalled → balance €300.02 with no bonus assigned → 1,636 bets without any bonus assignment → balance grows above €4,000 → €4,000 withdrawal requested.
LuckyVibe subsequently allowed only €383.98 and confiscated €3,616.02 by applying the previous cashback maximum-win limit to the later winnings.
I therefore respectfully ask that the complaint not be closed solely on the existence of the 10x maximum win clause.
The key question is whether that clause can still be applied to winnings generated after the wagering requirement had already been completed and after LuckyVibe’s own system stopped assigning the cashback bonus to my bets.
I can provide the complete original DSAR ZIP file supplied by LuckyVibe, including the CSV files mentioned above, so that Casino Guru can independently verify every figure and timestamp.
Thank you very much for taking another look at this specific point.
Automatski prevedeno: