Dragi Julijus / gospodin O tim,
Hvala vam što ste odvojili vreme da objasnite razloge za vašu odluku. Iako na kraju nismo uspeli da postignemo obostrani dogovor u ovom konkretnom slučaju, cenim vaše angažovanje tokom celog procesa rešavanja žalbe.
Priznajem i poštujem vaš stav sa stroge ugovorne i tehničke perspektive i mogu da razumem obrazloženje na kojem se zasniva vaša odluka, iako se naša procena ovog pitanja razlikuje.
Moram s poštovanjem, ali čvrsto da ponovim da ovaj pristup nije u skladu sa fer, transparentnim i korisnički prilagođenim praksama koje zagovaramo, koje je usvojila velika većina renomiranih operatera i koje igrači razumno očekuju.
Iako priznajem Uslove i odredbe kazina i da je, kao opšti princip, odgovornost igrača da pregleda i razume uslove bonusa pre učešća, praktična primena ovih pravila takođe mora biti uzeta u obzir.
Konkretno, ako su igre o kojima je reč bile u potpunosti dostupne igračima bez ikakvih ograničenja koja su sprovođena na tehničkom nivou, i nisu bila obezbeđena iskačuća upozorenja, obaveštenja u igri, poruke na nalogu ili slična upozorenja koja bi jasno ukazivala da takva igra nije dozvoljena u okviru aktivnog bonusa — ili da bi mogla dovesti do oduzimanja dobitaka — onda sprovođenje takvih kazni pokreće opravdanu zabrinutost sa stanovišta pravičnosti i transparentnosti.
Prema našem Kodeksu za fer kockanje: Naši stavovi o problematičnim oblastima

Primena najstrože kazne – konfiskacije celog dobitka tamo gde nije ostvarena nikakva merljiva korist – je nesrazmerna i nespojiva sa praksom fer-pleja. Zato smatramo da su vaše postupke nepravedne. Većina uglednih operatera bi, po našem iskustvu, u sličnim okolnostima usvojila obzirniji i pristup prilagođeniji korisnicima, uzimajući u obzir celokupni kontekst, umesto da se fokusiraju na identifikovanje bilo kakvog mogućeg kršenja pravila kao razloga za uskraćivanje dobitka igraču koji nije stekao nepravednu prednost, kao što se čini u ovom slučaju.
Stoga ću ovu žalbu u našem sistemu označiti kao „ Nerešeno – Protiv fer kockanja ".
Ovaj ishod ne samo da će negativno uticati na ocenu indeksa bezbednosti vašeg kazina, već će poslužiti i kao upozorenje drugim igračima u vezi sa vašim praksama — posebno vašom sklonošću da kažnjavate igrače zbog onoga što izgleda kao vaša sopstvena nesposobnost da obezbedite fer i transparentno okruženje.
Dragi HOLIVUD84,
Nažalost, uprkos opsežnoj komunikaciji sa timom kazina — i putem e-pošte i kao što je dokumentovano u temi žalbi — nismo uspeli da postignemo obostrano razumevanje ili mogući konsenzus o tome kako je ovaj slučaj mogao biti rešen, a kazino je zadržao svoju prvobitnu odluku.
Iako mogu da razumem da je, sa strogo tehničke tačke gledišta, kazino imao razloge za svoje postupke, moram s poštovanjem reći da ovaj pristup nije u skladu sa fer, transparentnim i korisnički prilagođenim praksama koje zagovaramo – praksama koje je usvojila velika većina renomiranih operatera i koje igrači razumno očekuju.
U potpunosti priznajemo pravo kazina da sprovodi svoje Uslove i odredbe. Istovremeno, ne smatramo da je pristup operatera u ovom slučaju bio pravedan kada se posmatra u širem kontekstu slučaja kao što je gore objašnjeno. U uporedivim situacijama kod drugih renomiranih operatera, često smo viđali postignuta proporcionalnija i ka igračima orijentisanija rešenja.
Kao rezultat toga, označiću ovu žalbu kao „ Nerešeno – Protiv fer kockanja " u našem sistemu.
Razumem da je ovo daleko od ishoda koji ste očekivali i zaista bih voleo da vam mogu doneti bolje vesti. Međutim, pad ocene uzrokovan nerešenim žalbama može vremenom podstaći kazino da razmisli i poboljša svoj pristup. Ovaj nerešeni status ne samo da će negativno uticati na ocenu Indeksa bezbednosti kazina, već će poslužiti i kao referentna tačka za druge igrače prilikom procene praksi kazina.
Ukoliko kazino odluči da ponovo razmotri stvar i da je reši na odgovarajući način u budućnosti, biće nam više nego drago da ponovo otvorimo žalbu, a vi ćete biti obavešteni putem e-pošte bez odlaganja.
U ovoj fazi, obično bih vam ponudio mogućnost da eskalirate svoj slučaj nadležnom organu za licenciranje kazina. Međutim, s obzirom na to da MrO Casino trenutno posluje bez važeće licence, jedini mogući dodatni način delovanja čini se da je putem zakonskih puteva. Razumem da ovo nije idealna situacija i nažalost je jedan od rizika povezanih sa saradnjom sa operaterima koji nemaju važeću licencu za igre na sreću izdatu od strane priznatih organa.
Ovde se završava naša direktna pomoć u vezi sa vašim slučajem. Naravno, slobodni ste da istražite druge načine rešavanja i, ako smatrate da je prikladno, potražite nezavisan pravni savet u vezi sa vašim mogućnostima. Međutim, svaka pravna procena ili zastupanje u potpunosti spada van kompetencije Casino.Guru-a i usluga koje smo u mogućnosti da pružimo.
Ljubazno bih vam predložio da, za buduće potrebe, proverite ocene i recenzije bilo kog kazina pre registracije i razmotrite izbor samo onih sa visokom ocenom, renomiranom licencom za igre na sreću i dobrim rezultatima u rešavanju žalbi. Ovo može pomoći u smanjenju verovatnoće da ćete imati slične probleme.
Žao mi je što nisam mogao/mogla biti od veće pomoći ovom prilikom. Znajte da je vaš slučaj shvaćen ozbiljno i da smo učinili sve što je u našoj moći da vas zastupamo.
Ukoliko u budućnosti naiđete na bilo kakve probleme sa ovim ili bilo kojim drugim kazinom, slobodno nas kontaktirajte — potrudićemo se da vam pomognemo.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Mihal
Kazino Guru
Dear Julius / MrO Team,
Thank you for taking the time to outline the reasoning behind your decision. Although we were ultimately unable to reach a mutual understanding in this particular case, I appreciate your engagement throughout the complaint resolution process.
I acknowledge and respect your position from a strict contractual and technical perspective, and I can understand the reasoning upon which your decision is based, even though our assessment of the matter differs.
I must respectfully but firmly reiterate that this approach does not align with the fair, transparent, and user-friendly practices we advocate, that the vast majority of reputable operators have adopted, and that players reasonably expect.
While I acknowledge the casino's Terms and Conditions and that, as a general principle, it is the player's responsibility to review and understand bonus terms prior to participation, the practical application of these rules must also be considered.
In particular, if the games in question were fully accessible to players without any restrictions being enforced at a technical level, and no pop-up warnings, in-game notifications, account messages, or similar alerts were provided to clearly indicate that such gameplay was not permitted under an active bonus—or that it could lead to confiscation of winnings—then the enforcement of such penalties raise valid concerns from a fairness and transparency perspective.
As per our Fair Gambling Codex: Our Views on Problematic Areas

Applying the most severe penalty—confiscating the entire winnings where no measurable benefit was gained—is disproportionate and inconsistent with fair play practices. This is why we view your actions as unfair. The majority of reputable operators would, in our experience, in similar circumstances, adopt a more considerate and user-friendly approach, taking into account the overall context rather than focusing on identifying any possible rule violation as a reason to withhold winnings from a player who gained no unfair advantage, as it appears in this case.
I will therefore mark this complaint as "Unresolved – Against Fair Gambling" in our system.
This outcome will not only negatively affect your casino's safety index rating but will also serve as a warning to other players regarding your practices—particularly your tendency to penalize players for what appears to be your own inability to provide a fair and transparent environment.
Dear HOLLYWOOD84,
Unfortunately, despite extensive communication with the casino team—both via email and as documented in the complaint thread—we were unable to reach a mutual understanding or possible consensus on how this case could have been resolved, and the casino has maintained its original decision.
While I can understand that, from a strict technical standpoint, the casino had reasons for their actions, I must respectfully say that this approach does not align with the fair, transparent, and user-friendly practices we advocate—practices that the vast majority of reputable operators have adopted, and that players reasonably expect.
We fully acknowledge the casino's right to enforce its Terms and Conditions. At the same time, we do not feel that the operator's approach in this instance was fair when viewed in the broader context of the case as explained above. In comparable situations at other reputable operators, we have often seen more proportionate and player-oriented resolutions reached.
As a result, I will mark this complaint as "Unresolved – Against Fair Gambling" in our system.
I understand that this is far from the outcome you were hoping for, and I truly wish I could bring you better news. However, the decrease in rating caused by unresolved complaints may, over time, encourage the casino to reflect on and improve its approach. This unresolved status will not only negatively impact the casino's Safety Index rating but will also serve as a reference point for other players when evaluating the casino's practices.
Should the casino decide to revisit the matter and handle it appropriately in the future, we would be more than happy to reopen the complaint, and you would be notified by email without delay.
At this stage, I would normally offer you the option to escalate your case to the casino's licensing authority. However, given that MrO Casino is currently operating without a valid license, the only possible additional course of action seems to be through legal avenues. I understand this is not an ideal situation, and it is unfortunately one of the risks associated with engaging with operators that do not hold a valid gaming license issued by recognized authorities.
This is where our direct assistance in relation to your case concludes. You are, of course, free to explore other avenues of resolution and, if you consider it appropriate, seek independent legal advice regarding your options. However, any legal assessment or representation falls entirely outside the scope of Casino.Guru's competence and the services we are able to provide.
I would kindly suggest that, for future reference, you check the ratings and reviews of any casino prior to registering, and consider choosing only those with a high rating, a reputable gaming license, and a good track record of resolving complaints. This can help minimize the likelihood of experiencing similar issues.
I am sorry I could not be of more help on this occasion. Please know that your case has been taken seriously, and we have done everything within our means to advocate on your behalf.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please do not hesitate to reach out to us—we will try our best to assist.
Kind regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno: