Zdravo svima,
Dragi Raul45,
Hvala vam na dodatnim dokumentima koje ste dostavili i što ste odvojili vreme da objasnite svoj stav. Pregledao/la sam materijale koje ste podneli. Međutim, nažalost, ne smatram ih dovoljno relevantnim da bih promenio/la procenu ove žalbe.
Posebno, dokumenti koje ste dostavili ne izgledaju kao da su iz perioda relevantnog za sporne događaje, tako da ne utvrđuju koji su bili važeći uslovi bonusa ili kako vam je maksimalni limit za isplatu predstavljen u vreme kada je bonus aktiviran i odigran.
S druge strane, dokazi koje je pružio Mr Bet Casino uključuju snimak ekrana vašeg ćaskanja uživo sa njihovom podrškom od 17. aprila 2026. u 20:12 , koji je direktno povezan sa predmetnim bonusom.
U tom razgovoru ste posebno pitali o uslovima za maksimalni dobitak . Korisnička podrška kazina je jasno objasnila da je maksimalni iznos isplate 400.000 CLP , što se sastoji od:
- 200.000 CLP od bonus dobitaka , i
- 200.000 CLP iz besplatnih okretaja , pri čemu se deo besplatnih okretaja sastoji od dve serije od po 50 besplatnih okretaja, svaka sa maksimalnim isplatom od 100.000 CLP .
Korisnička služba vas je zatim eksplicitno pitala da li želite da se bonus uplati, a vi ste potvrdili da želite. Naknadno ste komentarisali:
„Ne mislim da ću osvojiti ni 10.000 hahaha"
Ovo je posebno relevantno jer pokazuje da su maksimalni uslovi isplate bili razmotreni sa vama pre nego što je bonus dodeljen , a ne da je kazino uveo ove uslove tek nakon što ste ispunili uslove klađenja.
Kazino je takođe pružio snimak ekrana koji prikazuje kako je bonus prikazan na igračevom nalogu, gde je takođe jasno naveden važeći maksimalni uslov za povlačenje:

Što se tiče istorije igranja, kazino je objasnio da njegov sistem čuva istoriju klađenja samo tri meseca. Stoga, ni kazino ni vi niste bili u mogućnosti da pružite kompletnu istoriju igranja za sporni period. Iako bih više voleo da sam pregledao te zapise, njihovo odsustvo, po mom mišljenju, ne poništava ostale dostupne dokaze iz tog vremena.
Najvažnije je da je dokaz iz ćaskanja uživo direktno povezan sa relevantnim bonusom i pokazuje da ste bili obavešteni o uslovima za maksimalni dobitak i da ste se eksplicitno složili da naknadno primite bonus.
Na osnovu dokaza koji su mi dostupni, smatram da je objašnjenje kazina dovoljno potkrepljeno da se ova žalba zaključi.
Shodno tome, zaključiću ovu žalbu kao odbijenu.
Hvala vam još jednom na dokazima i informacijama koje ste pružili tokom istrage. Razumem da se ne slažete sa stavom kazina, ali na osnovu dokumentacije koja mi je dostupna, ne mogu razumno zaključiti da je kazino primenio neotkriveni uslov maksimalnog isplatnog iznosa ili da je postupio nepravedno u ovom slučaju.
Hvala vam obojici na saradnji.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Samuel
Kazino Guru
Hello everyone,
Dear Raul45,
thank you for the additional documents you provided and for taking the time to explain your position. I have reviewed the materials you submitted. However, unfortunately, I do not consider them relevant enough to change the assessment of this complaint.
In particular, the documents you provided do not appear to be from the period relevant to the disputed events, so they do not establish what the applicable bonus conditions were or how the maximum withdrawal limit was presented to you at the time the bonus was activated and played.
The evidence provided by Mr Bet Casino, on the other hand, includes a screenshot of your live chat with their support from 17 April 2026 at 20:12, which is directly connected to the bonus in question.
In that conversation, you specifically asked about the maximum winnings conditions. The casino's support clearly explained that the maximum withdrawal was 400,000 CLP, consisting of:
- 200,000 CLP from the bonus winnings, and
- 200,000 CLP from the Free Spins, with the Free Spins portion consisting of two batches of 50 Free Spins, each with a maximum withdrawal of 100,000 CLP.
The support then explicitly asked whether you wanted the bonus to be credited, and you confirmed that you did. You subsequently commented:
"I don't think I'll even win 10,000 hahaha"
This is particularly relevant because it demonstrates that the maximum withdrawal conditions were discussed with you before the bonus was credited, rather than the casino introducing these conditions only after you had completed the wagering requirements.
The casino also provided a screenshot showing how the bonus was displayed on the player's account, where the applicable maximum withdrawal condition is also clearly stated:

Regarding the gameplay history, the casino explained that its system retains betting history for only three months. Therefore, neither the casino nor you were able to provide the complete gameplay history for the disputed period. While I would have preferred to review those records, their absence does not, in my view, invalidate the other contemporaneous evidence available.
Most importantly, the live chat evidence is directly connected to the relevant bonus and demonstrates that you were informed about the maximum winnings conditions and explicitly agreed to receive the bonus afterwards.
Based on the evidence available to me, I therefore consider the casino's explanation sufficiently supported to conclude this complaint.
I will consequently close this complaint as rejected.
Thank you again for the evidence and information you provided throughout the investigation. I understand that you disagree with the casino's position, but based on the documentation available to me, I cannot reasonably conclude that the casino applied an undisclosed maximum withdrawal condition or acted unfairly in this matter.
Thank you both for your cooperation.
Best regards,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno: