Dragi Igore,
Hvala vam na dodatnim pitanjima. Drago nam je da razjasnimo i pružimo potpunu transparentnost.
Nakon pregleda originalnog imejla igrača iz marta 2025. godine, možemo potvrditi sledeće činjenice:
1. Trajanje samoisključenja
U zahtevu igrača iz marta nije bilo precizirano trajanje, niti je eksplicitno zahtevano trajno samoisključenje ili nepovratno zatvaranje naloga.
Kada igrač zahteva samoisključenje bez definisanja vremenskog okvira, MrJones Casino primenjuje standardni unapred definisani privremeni period samoisključenja, u skladu sa svojom Politikom odgovornog kockanja i internim kontrolama sistema. Ovaj pristup je osmišljen da pruži trenutnu zaštitu, uz poštovanje namere igrača i izbegavanje nametanja trajnih ograničenja koja nisu tražena.
Dužina primenjenog isključenja je stoga bila vođena politikom i definisana sistemom, a ne diskreciona.
2. Da li je igrač bio obavešten da to nije trajno
Da. U vreme kada je ograničenje primenjeno, igrač je obavešten da je samoisključenje privremeno i da će se nalog automatski ponovo otvoriti kada period isključenja istekne, osim ako igrač nije kontaktirao kazino da zatraži produženje ili trajno zatvaranje.
Igraču je takođe rečeno da može da zatraži trajno zatvaranje u bilo kom trenutku tokom ili nakon perioda isključenja.
Takav zahtev nije primljen.
3. Ponovno otvaranje računa
Kazino nije ručno ponovo otvorio nalog, niti je doneta bilo kakva odluka kojom bi se zanemarile mere zaštite odgovornog kockanja.
Ponovno otvaranje se dogodilo automatski nakon isteka unapred definisanog perioda isključenja, kako je predviđeno sistemom i politikom koja je bila na snazi u to vreme. Ovo je standardni, nediskricioni proces koji se dosledno primenjuje na sve igračke naloge.
4. Naknadne radnje
Kada je igrač ponovo kontaktirao kazino i potvrdio da ima stalne probleme u vezi sa kockanjem, nalog je odmah i trajno zatvoren. Ostaje trajno zatvoren i neće biti ponovo otvoren ni pod kojim okolnostima.
5. Zahtev za povraćaj novca
Zahtev za povraćaj novca je posebno i pažljivo pregledan, na osnovu evidencije transakcija, vremena i statusa računa u vreme uplate. Pošto je račun bio otvoren, neograničen i operativan u skladu sa politikom u vreme kada su uplate izvršene, zahtev je odbijen. Ova odluka je saopštena igraču i ostaje konačna.
Zaključak
Nije bilo kršenja politike, nehata ili diskrecionog ponovnog otvaranja naloga sa ograničenjem za kockanje.
Prvobitno isključenje je bilo privremeno zbog nedostatka određenog trajanja ili trajnog zahteva. Ponovno otvaranje je bilo automatsko i vođeno sistemom. Kazino je delovao prikladno i proporcionalno u svakoj fazi i primenio je trajno zatvaranje čim je igrač ponovio zabrinutost u vezi sa kockanjem.
Verujemo da ovo u potpunosti razjašnjava stvar i pomaže u zaključivanju žalbe.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Tim za podršku gospodina Džounsa
Dear Igor,
Thank you for your follow up questions. We are happy to clarify and provide full transparency.
Following a review of the player’s original email from March 2025, we can confirm the following facts:
1. Duration of the self exclusion
The player’s March request did not specify any duration, nor did it explicitly request a permanent self exclusion or irreversible account closure.
When a player requests self exclusion without defining a time frame, MrJones Casino applies a standard predefined temporary self exclusion period, in accordance with its Responsible Gambling Policy and internal system controls. This approach is designed to provide immediate protection while respecting player intent and avoiding imposing permanent restrictions that were not requested.
The length of the exclusion applied was therefore policy driven and system defined, not discretionary.
2. Whether the player was informed it was not permanent
Yes. At the time the restriction was applied, the player was informed that the self exclusion was temporary, and that the account would automatically reopen once the exclusion period expired, unless the player contacted the casino to request an extension or permanent closure.
The player was also advised that they could request a permanent closure at any time during or after the exclusion period.
No such request was received.
3. Reopening of the account
The account was not manually reopened by the casino, nor was any decision taken to override responsible gambling safeguards.
The reopening occurred automatically once the predefined exclusion period expired, as designed under the system and policy in place at the time. This is a standard, non discretionary process applied consistently across all player accounts.
4. Subsequent actions
Once the player contacted the casino again and confirmed ongoing gambling related concerns, the account was immediately and permanently closed. It remains permanently closed and will not be reopened under any circumstances.
5. Refund request
The refund request was reviewed separately and carefully, based on transaction records, timing, and the account status at the time of deposits. As the account was open, unrestricted, and operational in line with policy at the time the deposits were made, the request was declined. This decision was communicated to the player and remains final.
Conclusion
There was no policy breach, negligence, or discretionary reopening of a gambling restricted account.
The initial exclusion was temporary due to the absence of a specified duration or permanent request. The reopening was automatic and system driven. The casino acted appropriately and proportionately at every stage, and applied a permanent closure as soon as the player reiterated gambling related concerns.
We trust this clarifies the matter fully and assists in bringing the complaint to a conclusion.
Kind regards,
MrJones Support Team
Automatski prevedeno: