Zdravo svima,
Poštovani gospodine Pačo Kazino,
Pregledao sam SPER dokument koji je igrač direktno dostavio u ovoj temi žalbi. Čini se da dokument sadrži ime, adresu i datum igrača, pa bih bio zahvalan na pojašnjenju zašto nije prihvaćen kao validan dokaz o adresi.
Možete li, molim vas, objasniti šta je bilo nedovoljno u vezi sa ovim dokumentom? Na primer, da li je problem bio povezan sa vrstom dokumenta, njegovim formatom, organom koji ga je izdao, datumom ili nekim drugim zahtevom vaše KYC procedure?
Pošto ste izjavili da dokument izdat od strane vlade može biti prihvaćen kao dokaz o adresi, bio bih vam zahvalan da razumete zašto SPER dokument koji je igrač dostavio ne ispunjava ovaj zahtev.
Hvala vam na saradnji. Radujem se vašem pojašnjenju.
Hello everyone,
Dear MrPacho Casino,
I have reviewed the SPER document provided by the player directly in this complaint thread. The document appears to contain the player's name, address, and date, so I would appreciate some clarification as to why it was not accepted as a valid proof of address.
Could you please explain specifically what was insufficient about this particular document? For example, was the issue related to the document type, its format, the issuing authority, the date, or some other requirement of your KYC procedure?
Since you have stated that a government-issued document can be accepted as proof of address, I would appreciate understanding why the SPER document provided by the player does not meet this requirement.
Thank you for your cooperation. I look forward to your clarification.
Automatski prevedeno: