Zvanično eskaliram ovo pitanje. Izjave koje je dao/la Neon54 nisu u skladu sa stvarnim vremenskim okvirom, dokazima ili obavezama odgovornog kockanja koje zahteva vaša licenca.
1. Vremenski okvir koji ste naveli nije tačan
Kontaktirao sam Neon54 više puta putem veb ćaskanja, i pre i posle mog formalnog imejla o samoisključenju poslatog 27. oktobra u 2:37.
Imam:
Snimci ekrana ćaskanja uživo gde sam tražio pomoć za zatvaranje naloga i odgovorno kockanje
Prvi imejl o samoisključenju
Nekoliko dodatnih imejlova tokom narednih dana
Nije bilo odgovora od kazina tokom tog perioda
Potpun pristup mom nalogu sve vreme, uključujući mogućnost uplate depozita i postavljanja opklada
Bonusi i promotivne ponude koje su mi poslate tokom ovog perioda
Ovo nije bio prvi put da sam tražio pomoć ili zatvaranje sajta Neon54 u vezi sa odgovornim kockanjem, a moji zahtevi su i dalje ignorisani.
Vaša tvrdnja da je račun zatvoren „u roku od 24 sata" je dokazivo netačna.
2. Neon54 ne ispunjava svoje obaveze odgovornog kockanja prema licenci Kurasaoa
Neon54 posluje pod licencom Antilofonskog Kurasaoa 8048/JAZ.
Prema toj licenci, zahtevi za odgovorno kockanje navode:
Zahtev za samoisključenje mora pokrenuti trenutnu akciju
Pristup nalogu treba odmah suspendovati ili u razumnom, kratkom roku
Operateri ne smeju nastaviti da prihvataju opklade ili depozite nakon što igrač prijavi štetu, zatraži zatvaranje ili zatraži isključenje
Operatori ne smeju slati marketinške ili bonus ponude nakon što prime zahtev za isključenje
Operatori moraju održavati efikasan i pristupačan sistem samoisključivanja
Nastavak dozvoljavanja kockanja nakon prijema zahteva za odgovorno kockanje predstavlja kršenje obaveza dužne pažnje
Ovi zahtevi se mogu naći u Okviru za odgovorno igranje Antilefona i u smernicama Odbora za kontrolu igranja na sreću Kurasaa. Ono što se dogodilo u mom slučaju jasno krši te standarde.
3. Vaši Uslovi korišćenja ne nadjačavaju zakone o odgovornom kockanju
Navođenje klauzula kao što su „bez povraćaja novca nakon klađenja" ili „potvrđujete da nemate zavisnost" nije odbrana kada je kazino već obavešten o štetnosti kockanja.
Kada igrač zatraži isključenje ili prijavi probleme sa kockanjem, operater ima zajedničku odgovornost da spreči dalje gubitke. Obaveze odgovornog kockanja imaju prednost nad opštim uslovima i odredbama.
4. Bio sam ohrabren da nastavim sa kockanjem nakon mog zahteva za isključenje
Čak i nakon što sam tražio samoisključenje:
Moj račun je ostao otvoren
Bonusi su mi poslati
Marketinški imejlovi su nastavljeni
Depoziti su i dalje primani
Opklade su i dalje bile prihvaćene
Ovo je izuzetno ozbiljno i direktno je u suprotnosti sa zahtevima odgovornog kockanja.
5. Ako se ovo pitanje ne reši, eskaliraću ga nadležnom organu za licenciranje i nastaviti sa formalnim otkrivanjem.
Ukoliko se ne postigne razumno rešenje, eskaliraću stvar na:
Odbor za kontrolu kockanja Kurasaoa ( complaints@gamingcontrolboard.org )
Žalbe u vezi sa Antitelefonskom licencom 8048/JAZ ( complaints@curacao-egaming.com )
ADR usluga Casino Guru-a
Ako bude potrebno, preduzeću i pravne mere. Tokom otkrivanja, Neon54 će biti dužan da otkrije:
Interni evidencije odgovornog kockanja
Sve vremenske oznake mojih zahteva
Transkripti ćaskanja
Radnje osoblja u vezi sa mojim zahtevom za isključenje
Sve marketinške i bonus aktivnosti poslate nakon mog zahteva
Dokumenti interne politike
Bilo kakve interne procene vezane za moj slučaj
Svi prethodni slični slučajevi
Ova otkrića će jasno pokazati da li su poštovani protokoli odgovornog kockanja.
6. Zahtevano rešenje
Molim:
Povraćaj novca ili delimični povraćaj svih gubitaka koji su nastali nakon mog prvog zahteva za odgovorno kockanje 27. oktobra u 2:37
Potvrda trajnog samoisključivanja za sve povezane brendove
Potvrda o licenciranju i posredničkom ovlašćenju kazina
Ako se ovo ne reši brzo, eskaliraću to u potpunosti kroz regulatorne i sudske postupke.
Spreman sam da na zahtev privatno pružim sve dokaze Casino Guru-u.
I am formally escalating this matter. The statements made by Neon54 do not align with the actual timeline, evidence, or the responsible gambling obligations required under your licence.
1. The timeline you provided is not accurate
I contacted Neon54 multiple times through webchat, both before and after my formal self-exclusion email sent on 27 October at 2:37am.
I have:
Screenshots of the live chat where I requested account closure and responsible gambling assistance
The initial self-exclusion email
Several follow-up emails over the next days
No responses from the casino during that period
Full access to my account the entire time, including the ability to deposit and place bets
Bonus and promotional offers sent to me during this period
This was not the first time I had asked Neon54 for responsible gambling help or closure, and my requests were still ignored.
Your claim that the account was closed "within 24 hours" is provably incorrect.
2. Neon54 is not meeting its responsible gambling obligations under its Curaçao licence
Neon54 operates under the Antillephone Curaçao licence 8048/JAZ.
Under that licence, the responsible gambling requirements state:
A self-exclusion request must trigger immediate action
Account access should be suspended right away or within a reasonable, short window
Operators may not continue to accept bets or deposits after a player declares harm, asks for closure, or requests exclusion
Operators must not send marketing or bonus offers after receiving a request for exclusion
Operators must maintain an effective and accessible self-exclusion system
Continuing to allow gambling after receiving a responsible gambling request is a violation of due-care obligations
These requirements can be found in Antillephone’s Responsible Gaming Framework and in guidance from the Curaçao Gaming Control Board. What occurred in my case clearly breaches those standards.
3. Your Terms and Conditions do not override responsible gambling laws
Quoting clauses such as "no refunds after betting" or "you confirm you do not have an addiction" is not a defence when the casino has already been placed on notice about gambling harm.
Once a player asks for exclusion or declares issues with gambling, the operator has a shared responsibility to prevent further losses. Responsible gambling obligations override general T&Cs.
4. I was encouraged to continue gambling after my exclusion request
Even after I asked for self-exclusion:
My account stayed open
Bonuses were sent to me
Marketing emails continued
Deposits were still accepted
Bets were still accepted
This is extremely serious and directly contradicts responsible gambling requirements.
5. If this matter is not resolved, I will escalate it to the licensing authority and proceed with formal discovery
Unless a reasonable settlement is reached, I will be escalating the matter to:
Curaçao Gaming Control Board (complaints@gamingcontrolboard.org)
Antillephone Licence 8048/JAZ complaints (complaints@curacao-egaming.com)
Casino Guru’s ADR service
If necessary, I will also take legal action. During discovery, Neon54 will be required to disclose:
Internal responsible gambling logs
All timestamps of my requests
Chat transcripts
Staff actions regarding my exclusion request
Any marketing and bonus activity sent after my request
Internal policy documents
Any internal assessments related to my case
Any prior similar cases
These disclosures will show clearly whether responsible gambling protocols were followed.
6. Requested resolution
I am requesting:
A refund or partial refund of all losses that occurred after my first responsible gambling request on 27 October at 2:37am
Confirmation of permanent self-exclusion across all associated brands
Confirmation of the casino’s licensing and mediation authority
If this is not resolved promptly, I will escalate it fully through the regulator and court processes.
I am prepared to provide all evidence privately to Casino Guru upon request.
Automatski prevedeno: